MHB GCD is same in a field and its superfield.

  • Thread starter Thread starter caffeinemachine
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Field Gcd
AI Thread Summary
In an extension field K of a field F, the monic greatest common divisor (GCD) of polynomials p(t) and q(t) in F[t] is identical to their monic GCD in K[t]. If p(t) and q(t) share a non-trivial common factor in K[t], it implies they must also have one in F[t], contradicting the assumption that they do not. This leads to the conclusion that any common factor in K must also exist in F. Therefore, the GCD remains unchanged when moving from F[t] to K[t]. The relationship between the GCDs in both fields highlights the consistency of polynomial factorization across field extensions.
caffeinemachine
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
799
Reaction score
15
Let $K$ be an extension field of a field $F$ and let $p(t),q(t)\in F[t]$. Show that the monic greatest common divisors of $p(t)$ and $q(t)$ in $F[t]$ is same as the monic greatest common divisor of $p(t)$ and $q(t)$ in $K$.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hint:

Let $p(t)$ and $q(t)$ have a non trivial common factor in $K[t]$. Assume that $p$ and $q$ don't have a non-trivial common factor in
$F[t]$. Then there exist $a,b\in F[t]$ such that $pa+qb=1$. But this contradicts the fact that $p$ and $q$ have a non-trivial common factor in $K[t]$.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Back
Top