General Force and Motion Question

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a spaceship and an asteroid connected by a rope, both initially at rest. The spaceship exerts a force on the asteroid, and the question is about the time it takes for the asteroid to reach the spaceship, given their masses and the force applied.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the implications of the spaceship pulling the asteroid and question how the asteroid can catch up if it has a greater mass. There are attempts to apply Newton's laws and kinematic equations, with some confusion about the direction of acceleration and the distances each object travels.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring various calculations and interpretations of the problem. Some have provided insights into relative motion and acceleration, while others are questioning the initial conditions and the correctness of the provided numbers. There is no explicit consensus on the final answer, but multiple perspectives are being considered.

Contextual Notes

There is uncertainty regarding the initial conditions and the interpretation of the forces involved, particularly whether the spaceship is actively moving or simply pulling the asteroid. The discussion also highlights potential confusion over the distances each object must travel before they collide.

bpw91284
Messages
67
Reaction score
0
A spaceship (3500kg) and an asteroid (6200kg) both initially at rest are attached by a rope. The spaceship then pulls on the asteroid with a 490 N force. If they are initially 450 meters away, how long does it take the asteroid to hit the spaceship?

First off I’m confused because if the spaceship was pulling the asteroid why would the asteroid ever catch up to it unless the spaceship stopped or slowed down? The problem is unclear about this. The answer is 67 seconds.

I tried multiple different routes to solve this problem using…
F=ma
Delta_x = (v_o)*t + ½*a*(t^2)

For the asteroid to catch the spaceship it must be accelerating faster but how can that be if it weighs more?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In which direction does the spaceship accelerate?
 
Doc Al said:
In which direction does the spaceship accelerate?

It's in outer space so it doesn't matter.
 
Of course it matters! What's the acceleration of the asteroid? What's the acceleration of the spaceship?

Hint: Newton's 3rd law
 
Doc Al said:
Of course it matters! What's the acceleration of the asteroid? What's the acceleration of the spaceship?

Hint: Newton's 3rd law

Well since the spaceship and the rock start from rest and the spaceship starts pulling the rock then wouldn't they're accerlations be in the same direction?
 
bpw91284 said:
Well since the spaceship and the rock start from rest and the spaceship starts pulling the rock then wouldn't they're accerlations be in the same direction?

No. The ship is not trying to move... meaning it doesn't have any thrust activated... it's just pulling on the asteroid with a rope.
 
bpw91284 said:
Well since the spaceship and the rock start from rest and the spaceship starts pulling the rock then wouldn't they're accerlations be in the same direction?
Well... what direction is the force on each? (A simple diagram might help you.)
 
learningphysics said:
No. The ship is not trying to move... meaning it doesn't have any thrust activated... it's just pulling on the asteroid with a rope.

ohhh it is just pulling the rock towards it... I see. I did some math and still did not get the right answer though. Here it is:

For the rock:
a=F/m=490/6200=0.8
Delta_x = (v_o)*t + ½*a*(t^2) => 450=0.5*0.8*t^2
t=106 sec
v=x/t=450/106=4.2

For the ship:
a=F/m=490/3500=0.14
Delta_x = (v_o)*t + ½*a*(t^2) => 450=0.5*0.14*t^2
t=80.2
v=5.6

So they're relative velocities heading toward each other is 4.2+5.6=9.82
If that was right then using t=x/v = 450/9.8 I get around 46 secs. But the answer is 67 :(
 
bpw91284 said:
For the rock:
a=F/m=490/6200=0.8
Delta_x = (v_o)*t + ½*a*(t^2) => 450=0.5*0.8*t^2
t=106 sec
v=x/t=450/106=4.2

For the ship:
a=F/m=490/3500=0.14
Delta_x = (v_o)*t + ½*a*(t^2) => 450=0.5*0.14*t^2
t=80.2
v=5.6
Since both asteroid and ship move, they don't both travel the full 450 (measured with respect to the initial frame). Their distances add to 450 m. Note that they both travel the same amount of time until they collide.

There's an easier way: Consider the relative acceleration.
 
  • #10
You appear to have calculated the time it would take the asteroid to go 450 m, the time it would take the spaceship to go 450 m and then added them! Do you understand that if the spaceship is moving toward the asteroid, the asteroid doesn't have to cover the entire 450 m to hit it? What you want to find is the time for the asteroid and spaceship to cover a total of 450 m.
 
  • #11
Alright, this is what I just tried (didn't work)

delta_x_r + delta_x_s = 450
delta_x_r=0.5*0.08*t^2
delta_x_s=0.5*0.14*t^2

My TI-89 can solve mutiple eqns so I did not do the math wrong. Why does this not work?
 
  • #12
bpw91284 said:
Alright, this is what I just tried (didn't work)

delta_x_r + delta_x_s = 450
delta_x_r=0.5*0.08*t^2
delta_x_s=0.5*0.14*t^2

My TI-89 can solve mutiple eqns so I did not do the math wrong. Why does this not work?

What answer did you get?
 
  • #13
learningphysics said:
What answer did you get?


t=64 secs
 
  • #14
bpw91284 said:
t=64 secs
Seems right to me.
 
  • #15
bpw91284 said:
t=64 secs

That's what I get also... you sure the original numbers in the question are right? Did you mix up the 490 and 450?
 
  • #16
learningphysics said:
That's what I get also... you sure the original numbers in the question are right? Did you mix up the 490 and 450?

I don't think I mixed up any numbers. Thanks for all the help guys.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
7K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 75 ·
3
Replies
75
Views
7K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
14K
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
13
Views
3K