General Form of Canonical Transformations

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the general form of canonical transformations defined by the equations Q = f(q) + g(p) and P = c[f(q) + h(p)], where f, g, and h are differential functions and c is a non-zero constant. The key equation derived is c.f'(q)[h'(p)-g'(p)]=1, which is essential for proving canonicity. Participants suggest using partial differentiation with respect to q and p to derive additional equations that could help identify the functions f, g, and h. The conversation also touches on the importance of expressing the inverse transformation to relate q and p to Q and P. Overall, the thread emphasizes the analytical approach needed to solve these canonical transformation problems.
kolawoletech
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


How do I go about finding the most general form of the canonical transformation of the form
Q = f(q) + g(p)
P = c[f(q) + h(p)]
where f,g and h are differential functions and c is a constant not equal to zero. Where (Q,P) and (q,p) represent the generalised cordinates and conjugate momentum in the new and old system

Homework Equations


{Q,Q}={P,P}=0 {Q,P}=1

The Attempt at a Solution


I arrived at a function

c.f'(q)[h'(p)-g'(p)]=1

I don't know how to get further to prove canonicity
 
Physics news on Phys.org
kolawoletech said:
c.f'(q)[h'(p)-g'(p)]=1
There are two independent variables in this equation: p and q, and we require it to hold for all values of p and q. That should enable us to radically narrow down the possibilities for functions f, g and h.

Try partial differentiating both sides of the equation with respect to q to get one equation and then wrt p to get another.
What do those two equations tell you about the functions f and (h-g)?
 
I did that and got to "see the attachment"
But I am not so sure if I did it right
The rest of the question see solve the inverse of the canonical transformation: express q, p in terms of Q and P. The actual question is attached see attachment(it is the second question)
 

Attachments

  • IMG-20160412-WA0001.jpg
    IMG-20160412-WA0001.jpg
    24.1 KB · Views: 562
  • HjIkBnu9.jpg
    HjIkBnu9.jpg
    25.9 KB · Views: 490
I'm sorry but that photo is way too hard to read. Try typing it in using latex. This post is a primer to get you started. If you're studying physics then any time spent learning latex is a very good investment.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
567
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K