Hamiltonian conjugate dynamic variables

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a Hamiltonian mechanics problem involving a charge moving in a magnetic field. Participants are tasked with demonstrating the conjugate nature of specific dynamic variables and expressing the Hamiltonian in terms of these variables.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore how to show that the variables Q and P are conjugate by evaluating Poisson brackets. There is a focus on the correct evaluation of these brackets and the implications of their results.

Discussion Status

Some participants are questioning the use of subscripts in the notation for the conjugate variables and are checking the correctness of their Poisson bracket calculations. There is an ongoing examination of the relationships between the variables and the Hamiltonian, with attempts to clarify the expressions involved.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of the problem statement and are attempting to navigate the definitions and properties of conjugate variables in the context of Hamiltonian mechanics.

thecourtholio
Messages
18
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Consider a charge ##q##, with mass ##m##, moving in the ##x-y## plane under the influence of a uniform magnetic field ##\vec{B}=B\hat{z}##. Show that the Hamiltonian $$ H = \frac{(\vec{p}-q\vec{A})^2}{2m}$$ with $$\vec{A} = \frac{1}{2}(\vec{B}\times\vec{r})$$ reduces to $$ H(x,y,p_x,p_y) = \frac{(p_x+\frac{1}{2}qBy)^2}{2m} + \frac{(p_y-\frac{1}{2}qBx)^2}{2m}$$
Demonstrate
$$ Q = \frac{(p_x+\frac{1}{2}qBy)}{qB} \qquad \qquad P = (p_y-\frac{1}{2}qBx) $$
are conjugate dynamic variables, given ##x, p_x, y, p_y## are, then express $$H(Q,P)$$ in terms of ##m## and the cyclotron frequency, ##\omega \frac{qB}{m}##

Show next that
$$ P' = \frac{(p_x-\frac{1}{2}qBy)}{qB} \qquad \qquad Q' = (p_y+\frac{1}{2}qBx) $$
Are yet another, linearly-independent, conjugate pair whose brackets with ##Q,P## necessarily vanish, i.e.
$$ [Q,Q'] = [Q,P'] = [P,Q'] = [P,P'] = 0 $$
Argue from the foregoing that ##Q',P'## must be constants of the motion

Homework Equations


Most are listed in problem statement. Definition of poisson bracket (PB): $$ [Q,P] = \frac{\partial Q}{\partial q}\frac{\partial P}{\partial p} - \frac{\partial Q}{\partial p}\frac{\partial P}{\partial q} $$
Fundamental PBs: ## [q_i,q_k] = [p_i,p_k] = 0, \ \ [q_i,p_k] = \delta_{ik}##

The Attempt at a Solution


My main question is, how exactly do I show that ##Q,P## are conjugate dynamical variables? Is this just by evaluating the PBs ##[Q_i, Q_k], [P_i, P_k], \text{ and } [Q_i,P_k]## and proving they preserve the fundamental PBs? So far, I have found
$$ [Q_i, Q_k]_{q,p} = 0 $$
And
$$ [P_i,P_k]_{q,p} = 0$$
But for ##[Q_i,P_k]_{q,p}## I find
$$ [Q_i,P_k]_{q,p} = \frac{1}{2}+\frac{1}{2}qB \neq 1 (or \neq \delta_{ik})$$
So is this not what I need to be doing or am I just evaluating it wrong?

And as for expressing the Hamiltonian as functions of ##Q## and ##P##, what do I need to do? My prof kind of worked out finding ##H(q(Q,P), p(Q,P))## for a harmonic oscillator by seeking a transformation of the form ##H(q(Q,P),p(Q,P)) = \frac{f^2(P)}{2m}##, but I'm having trouble figureing out how to do it in the reverse, like ##H(Q(q,p), P(q,p))## for this problem.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not clear why, given the problem statement, you are using subscripts on the proposed conjugate variables of P and Q. There are just the two as I read the problem.
I get the correct Poisson bracket relations on [Q,P] so check your work.
 
jambaugh said:
I'm not clear why, given the problem statement, you are using subscripts on the proposed conjugate variables of P and Q. There are just the two as I read the problem.
I get the correct Poisson bracket relations on [Q,P] so check your work.

I was just using the indecies as good practice so i remember to use all indecies of Q or P later if they need it. But for [Q,P] I find
$$[Q,P] = \bigg[\frac{\partial Q}{\partial x}\frac{\partial P}{\partial p_x} - \frac{\partial Q}{\partial p_x}\frac{\partial P}{\partial x}\bigg] + \bigg[ \frac{\partial Q}{\partial y}\frac{\partial P}{\partial p_y} - \frac{\partial Q}{\partial p_y}\frac{\partial P}{\partial y}\bigg]$$
Where ##\frac{\partial Q}{\partial x} = \frac{\partial P}{\partial p_x} = \frac{\partial Q}{\partial p_y} = 0## which make the PB
$$[Q,P] = -\frac{\partial Q}{\partial p_x}\frac{\partial P}{\partial x} + \frac{\partial Q}{\partial y}\frac{\partial P}{\partial p_y} = -(\frac{1}{qB})(-\frac{1}{2}qB) + (\frac{1}{2}qB)(1) = \frac{1}{2}+ \frac{1}{2}qB$$ so where am I going wrong?
 
\partial Q / \partial y = \tfrac{1}{2} , \partial P/\partial p_y = 1 So total bracket is \tfrac{1}{2} + \tfrac{1}{2} = 1 . Or did I mess up?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
6K
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K