General Relativity by Hobson, Lasenby and Efstathiou

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the book "General Relativity" by Hobson, Lasenby, and Efstathiou, specifically regarding its intuitiveness in presenting both the mathematics and physics of general relativity. Participants are invited to share their opinions and experiences with the book, particularly in the context of preparing for a first course in general relativity.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires about the intuitiveness of the book regarding both mathematics and physics.
  • Another participant questions the lack of background information provided by the original poster, suggesting that this information is necessary to assess the book's suitability.
  • A later reply clarifies that the original poster intends to enroll in their first general relativity course and has the necessary undergraduate background.
  • Some participants express a desire for general opinions on the book's writing quality and explanatory power.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

The discussion does not reach a consensus, as participants have differing views on the adequacy of the original inquiry and the need for background information to evaluate the book.

Contextual Notes

The discussion lacks specific evaluations of the book's content and effectiveness, as participants focus more on the nature of the inquiry rather than providing direct feedback on the book itself.

What are your opinions on this book?

  • Lightly recommended

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Neutral(just OK)

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Lightly not recommended

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Strongly not recommended

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    2
Joker93
Messages
502
Reaction score
37
Hello,
Is the book General Relativity by Hobson, Lasenby and Efstathiou good in the sense that is intuitive on the mathematics AND physics that it presents? Please vote and if you could also comment your opinion it would be much appreciated.
Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hasn't anybody used it?
 
Adam Landos said:
hasn't anybody used it?

Of course people have used it, but your post does't really invite helpful results. You neglect to tell us your background, or anything else for that matter. How are we then supposed to figure out whether this book is a good fit for you?
 
micromass said:
Of course people have used it, but your post does't really invite helpful results. You neglect to tell us your background, or anything else for that matter. How are we then supposed to figure out whether this book is a good fit for you?
I am just asking for general opinions. If it's well-written, intuitive, gives good explanations etc.
But if you need some background, I intend to enroll in my first GR course and I have the necessary background than an undergraduate student needs to tackle a first undergrad course in GR. I hope this helps and sorry if I was inaccurate.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K