General relativity: constant curvature, characterizing equation

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem in general relativity concerning the characterization of three-dimensional spaces with constant curvature, specifically through the Riemann curvature tensor. The original poster seeks clarification on how to approach the problem and the definition of curvature K.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster expresses uncertainty about how to begin the problem and questions the definition of curvature K. Some participants provide definitions related to the Ricci tensor and scalar curvature, suggesting a connection between the Riemann curvature tensor and constant curvature.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring different perspectives on the problem. One contributor has provided definitions related to the Ricci tensor and scalar curvature, while another has acknowledged a new viewpoint on the exercise. There is an indication of progress in understanding the implications of the equations discussed.

Contextual Notes

The original poster notes that curvature K has not been defined in their lecture, which may affect their ability to engage with the problem fully.

Derivator
Messages
147
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Show, that a three-dimensional space with constant curvature K is charaterized by the following equation for the Riemann curvature tensor:

[tex]R_{abcd} = K \cdot \left(g_{ac}g_{bd}-g_{ad}g_{bc}\right)[/tex]

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



Hi folks,

I would like to give an own attempt, but I have no Idea how to start.

We haven't defined the curvature K in lecture. How is it defined?
Has anybody an idea, how to start?

--
derivator
 
Physics news on Phys.org
anybody an idea?
 
Wald defines the Ricci tensor as

[tex]R_{ac}=R_{abc}{}^{b}[/tex]

And then the scalar curvature is the trace of the Ricci tensor

[tex]R=R_{a}{}^{a}[/tex]

Your text should have similar definitions.

So, I think want you want to do is to show that if [itex]R_{abcd} = K\left(g_{ac}g_{bd}-g_{ad}g_{bc}\right)[/itex], where [itex]K[/itex] is a constant, then the scalar curvature is [itex]R=K[/itex].
 
ah, thanks for your input.

i haven't seen this exercise from this point of view, but it makes sense.

I have found: R=6K, thus R is constant, thus we have a constant curvature.
 

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K