[General Relativity] Find the acceleration of an object

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the time component of the 4-acceleration of an object moving in a specific metric of general relativity. The metric is given as ds^2=-e^{2\phi}dt^2+\frac{1}{1-\frac{b(r)}{r}}dr^2, and participants are exploring the implications of this metric on the object's motion and acceleration.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the calculation of the four-velocity and its implications for the 4-acceleration. There are questions regarding the reference frame for the velocity, the correctness of calculations, and the interpretation of physical versus coordinate velocity. Some participants express uncertainty about specific terms and calculations, prompting requests for clarification and corrections.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants sharing their calculations and questioning each other's reasoning. Some have offered corrections to previous calculations, while others are seeking clarification on concepts related to the metric and the nature of velocity in this context. There is a collaborative effort to understand the relationships between different quantities in general relativity.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential errors in calculations and express confusion about the definitions of terms like physical velocity versus coordinate velocity. The discussion reflects a learning environment where assumptions about the metric and the nature of motion are being examined.

eoghan
Messages
201
Reaction score
7

Homework Statement


Given the metric
[tex]ds^2=-e^{2\phi}dt^2+\frac{1}{1-\frac{b(r)}{r}}dr^2[/tex]
find the time component of the 4-acceleration of an object moving with velocity v in the r direction.

The Attempt at a Solution


The four-velocity of the object is [tex]u^a=(t', v)[/tex]
where the prime stands for the derivative with respect to the proper time of the object.
I know that the four velocity satisfies [tex]g_{ab}u^au^b=-1[/tex] so I find
[tex]t'=\left(1+\frac{v}{1-\frac{b}{r}}\right)\exp(-2\phi)[/tex]
Now I use the formula
[tex]a^0=u^a\nabla_au^0=u^0(\partial_0\dot t+\Gamma_{0c}^0u^c)<br /> +u^1(\partial_1\dot t+\Gamma_{1c}^0u^c)[/tex]
and I find
[tex]a^0=t'\dot\phi v+v\left[\dot\phi t'+\frac{v}{2\exp(2\phi)}<br /> \frac{b/r^2}{\left(1-b/r\right)^2}\right][/tex]
where the dot stands for the derivation with respect to r and I've supposed that [itex]\partial_0 t'=\partial_1 t=0[/itex].
Could this be right?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
eoghan said:
moving with velocity v in the r direction

Velocity v with respect to whom?
 
eoghan said:
I know that the four velocity satisfies [tex]g_{ab}u^au^b=-1[/tex] so I find
[tex]t'=\left(1+\frac{v}{1-\frac{b}{r}}\right)\exp(-2\phi)[/tex]

I get something a little different... perhaps you should show your calculation
 
George Jones said:
Velocity v with respect to whom?
With respect to an observer at rest who sees the metric [itex]ds^2[/itex]

gabbagabbahey said:
I get something a little different... perhaps you should show your calculation
I'm a little tired...I did some stupid mistakes :blushing:
The metric is
[tex]ds^2=-e^{2\phi}dt^2+\frac{1}{1-\frac{b(r)}{r}}dr^2[/tex]
and I get
[tex] t'=\pm\sqrt{1+\frac{v^2}{1-\frac{b}{r}}}\:\:e^{\phi}[/tex]
Now I'm going to correct all the others formula (I've also found an error in a Christoffel symbol :blushing: )...
 
eoghan said:
With respect to an observer at rest who sees the metric [itex]ds^2[/itex]

Sorry, but I don't know what this means. Do you mean "At rest with respect to an observer who has contant [itex]r[/itex]"?
 
George Jones said:
Do you mean "At rest with respect to an observer who has contant [itex]r[/itex]"?

I think that this must be the case. Another qestion. Is [itex]v[/itex] a coordinate velocity, or is it an actual physical velocity?

Here is a (slick) way to calculate relative physical (not coordinate) speed between two observers who are coincident at an event. Suppose the two 4-velocities are [itex]u[/itex] and [itex]u'[/itex]. Then, [itex]-\gamma = -\left( 1 - v^2 \right)^{-1/2} = g \left( u , u' \right) = g_{\alpha \beta}u^\alpha u'^\beta.[/itex] This is an invariant quantity, and, consequently, can be calculated using any coordinate system/basis.

This works in all coordinate systems in both special and general relativity.

In order to use this method, you first need to (easily) find the 4-velocity of an observer who sits at constant [itex]r[/itex].
 
George Jones said:
I think that this must be the case
Yes, I mean that. And v is the physical velocity.

George Jones said:
Suppose the two 4-velocities are [itex]u[/itex] and [itex]u'[/itex]. Then, [itex]-\gamma = -\left( 1 - v^2 \right)^{-1/2} = g \left( u , u' \right) = g_{\alpha \beta}u^\alpha u'^\beta.[/itex]
I don't understand this. If I am at constant r, then my four velocity is
[itex]u^a=(e^{-\phi}, 0)[/itex] while the 4-velocity of the moving object is
[itex]u'^b=(k, v)[/itex] with k chosen so that [itex]u'^bu'_b=-1[/itex]. Where am I wrong?
 
eoghan said:
[itex]u'^b=(k, v)[/itex]

This isn't correct. Is v the spatial component of 4-velocity in special relativity?
 
There two ways that you can do this:

1) in a coordinate basis;

2) in an orthonormal basis (like in the other thread).

1) In a coordinate basis, the 4-velocity of the stationary observer has components [itex]\left( e^{-\phi} , 0\right)[/itex] and call the components of the other 4-velocity [itex]\left( u'^0 , u'^{1}\right)[/itex]. Use the method I give above to find [itex]u'^0[/itex].

2) In an orthonormal basis, what are the component of the 4-velocity of the stationary observer? The components of the other 4-velocity are the same as the components of 4-velocity in special relativity. What are these?

Notes: you don't have to do 2) to do 1); don't confuse the two methods.
 
  • #10
I got it! I used the coordinate basis method ad I've found the right answer
[tex]u'=(\gamma e^{-\phi}, \pm v\gamma\sqrt{1-\frac{b}{r}})[/tex].
But I don't understand why
[tex]-\gamma = -\left( 1 - v^2 \right)^{-1/2} = g \left( u , u' \right) = g_{\alpha \beta}u^\alpha u'^\beta[/tex]
In flat spacetime where [itex]u=(\gamma, \gamma v)[/itex] this is obvious, but how can you generalize it to a generic curved spacetime?
 
  • #11
Great!

In the orthonormal basis, the components of the two 4-velocities are [itex]\left( 1 , 0 \right)[/itex] and [itex]\left( \gamma , \gamma v \right)[/itex], just like in special relativity. Consequently, [itex]u^\mu u'_\mu = - \gamma[/itex] in the the orthonormal basis. But, [itex]u^\mu u'_\mu[/itex] is a scalar, and thus its value is independent of basis. Consequently, [itex]u^\mu u'_\mu = - \gamma[/itex] in every basis, including a coordinate basis.
 
  • #12
First of all, thank you very much for your help!
As you can see my knowledge of general relativity is very limited...
Why do you say that the components of the 4-velocities in an orthonormal basis is just like in special relativity? I'm studying GR on "Wald" and it doesn't explain these things
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
5K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
0
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K