General solution of a linear ordinary differential equation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The general solution of a linear ordinary differential equation (ODE) can indeed be expressed in terms of its initial conditions. Specifically, for an n-th order linear homogeneous ODE, the solution can be represented as a linear combination of fundamental solutions defined at a specific point x0. These fundamental solutions satisfy specific initial conditions, such as Y1(x0)=1 and Y2(x0)=0, which directly relate to the coefficients of the solution being equal to the initial values of the function and its derivatives at x0. This relationship illustrates how initial conditions influence the overall solution of the differential equation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of linear ordinary differential equations (ODEs)
  • Familiarity with fundamental solutions and initial value problems
  • Knowledge of Taylor and Maclaurin series expansions
  • Basic concepts of infinitesimal calculus
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the theory of linear ordinary differential equations and their solutions
  • Learn about the method of undetermined coefficients for solving ODEs
  • Explore the application of Taylor series in approximating functions
  • Investigate the role of initial conditions in the uniqueness of ODE solutions
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, particularly those focusing on differential equations, as well as educators looking to deepen their understanding of the relationship between initial conditions and solutions of linear ODEs.

hanson
Messages
312
Reaction score
0
Hi all.
Can the general solution of a linear ordinary differential equation be expressed in terms of its initial conditions?
It seems that I have seem this kind of representation.
It makes "some sense" to me but I hope to know if there is some "proof" or explanation of why it can be?

To be specific, for a n-th order ODE,
the solution is something like
y = y(xo)(something) + y'(xo)(something) + ... + y(n-1)(xo)(something)...

why?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hallo. The equation you mention here looks only like a Taylor- Mac Laurin development of the y(x0 + epsilon) function arond y(x0). Your something should be a factor (1/N!). epsilon ^N with N = 0, 1, ... Why it is so ? Well a good question but I need help too. Certainly the explanation is related to the methods of the infinitesimal calculus. The fact is that such a development demonstrates the relationship between the function in or at x0 plus epsilon and the function in or at xo. So yes conditions somewhere else have an influence on what hapens here.
 
Given any linear, nth (homogeneous) ordinary differential equation, you can define its "fundamental" solutions (at x= x0) as the solutions satisfiying
1) Y1(x0)= 1, Y1'(x0= 0, Y1"(x0)= 0, ...
2)Y2(x0)= 0, Y2'(x0)= 1, Y2"(x0)= 0, ...
.
.
.
n)Yn(x0)= 0, Yn'(x0)= 0, Yn"(x0= 0, ..., Yn(n)(x0)= 1.

Any solution to the differential equation can be written as a linear combination of those: Y(x)= C1Y1(x)+ C1Y2(x)+ ...+ CnYn(x).

If you set x= x0 in that equation you get C1= Y(x0).
If you differentiate both sides of the equation to get Y'(x)= C1Y1'(x)+ C2Y2'(x)+ ... and set = x0, you get C2=Y'(x0). Continuing in that way, you see that the coefficients are precisely the "initial values" for Y.
 
HallsofIvy said:
Given any linear, nth (homogeneous) ordinary differential equation, you can define its "fundamental" solutions (at x= x0) as the solutions satisfiying
1) Y1(x0)= 1, Y1'(x0= 0, Y1"(x0)= 0, ...
2)Y2(x0)= 0, Y2'(x0)= 1, Y2"(x0)= 0, ...
.
.
.
n)Yn(x0)= 0, Yn'(x0)= 0, Yn"(x0= 0, ..., Yn(n)(x0)= 1.

Any solution to the differential equation can be written as a linear combination of those: Y(x)= C1Y1(x)+ C1Y2(x)+ ...+ CnYn(x).

If you set x= x0 in that equation you get C1= Y(x0).
If you differentiate both sides of the equation to get Y'(x)= C1Y1'(x)+ C2Y2'(x)+ ... and set = x0, you get C2=Y'(x0). Continuing in that way, you see that the coefficients are precisely the "initial values" for Y.

i have problem understanding the following..
"define its "fundamental" solutions (at x= x0) as the solutions satisfiying
1) Y1(x0)= 1, Y1'(x0= 0, Y1"(x0)= 0, ...
2)Y2(x0)= 0, Y2'(x0)= 1, Y2"(x0)= 0, ...
.
.
.
n)Yn(x0)= 0, Yn'(x0)= 0, Yn"(x0= 0, ..., Yn(n)(x0)= 1."

why is this so...?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
8K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K