General solution to a 6th order DE

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on finding the general solution to the sixth-order differential equation y^(6) + y = 0. The user presents their solution, which includes six roots and a corresponding general solution, but questions its validity against a provided answer. Concerns are raised about the linear dependency of the terms in both solutions and the absence of sine terms in the provided answer. The user also speculates on the potential use of trigonometric identities in deriving the other solution. The conversation highlights confusion over the redundancy of certain constant factors in the alternative solution.
MathewsMD
Messages
430
Reaction score
7
Hi,

Problem: Given the DE: y^(6) + y = 0, find the general solution.

Solution. I found the roots to be: (sqrt3 - i)/2, (sqrt3 + i)/2, i, -i, (-sqrt3 + i)/2, (-sqrt3 - i)/2

Thus, my general solution led to:

y = c1cost + c2sint + c3exp(t/2*(sqrt3))*cos(t/2) + c4exp(t/2*(sqrt3))*sin(t/2) + c5exp(t/2*-(sqrt3))*cos(t/2) + c6exp(t/2*(-sqrt3))*sin(t/2)

I don't see any errors in this, but please let me know if there are.

When I looked at the solution, the answer is:

y = exp(t/2*(sqrt3))*(c1cos(t/2) + c2sin(t/2)) + c3cost + c4sint*exp(t/2*-(sqrt3))*(c5cos(t/2) + c6sin(t/2)

How exactly did they derive the solution? Is my original answer wrong? The solutions in my original answer seem linearly dependent, and I don't quite see how they derived the solution they did...any help is great!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think there's an error in their solution. Notice that they have a cos(t) term but no sin(t) term. You don't get one without the other. You could check your solution, although that's going to be a lot of work.
 
Mark44 said:
I think there's an error in their solution. Notice that they have a cos(t) term but no sin(t) term. You don't get one without the other. You could check your solution, although that's going to be a lot of work.

Yes, exactly! I just wasn't sure if they used a trig identity of sorts to find linear dependency or not b/w the terms.
It also seems odd (I may be mistaken) that they included c4 and c5 and c6 in their solution despite those terms being multiplied to yield only 2 terms, making the extra constant factor redundant, no?
Regardless, thank you for your comment.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K