General World Cup and in-game discussion

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The thread discusses various matches and events surrounding the World Cup, including live commentary, player performances, referee decisions, and team strategies. Participants share their thoughts on specific games, player actions, and the overall atmosphere of the tournament.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express dissatisfaction with refereeing decisions, particularly regarding penalties awarded during matches.
  • There are differing opinions on the performance of teams, with some arguing that Brazil played poorly while others believe they deserved their win.
  • Participants note the impact of weather conditions on gameplay, particularly in relation to the venues used for matches.
  • Several comments highlight the unexpected outcomes of matches, such as Costa Rica's victory over Uruguay and the performance of the Netherlands against Spain.
  • Some participants discuss the implications of team strategies and training methods in relation to performance in hot weather conditions.
  • There is speculation about which teams may advance in the tournament, with various predictions and preferences expressed for potential winners.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally express a range of opinions, with multiple competing views on referee decisions, team performances, and match outcomes. The discussion remains unresolved on several points, particularly regarding the quality of officiating and the effectiveness of different teams.

Contextual Notes

Some participants reference specific statistics and historical performance of teams, but these claims are not universally accepted and are subject to debate. There are also mentions of potential biases in FIFA rankings and the interpretation of match events.

Who May Find This Useful

Fans of soccer, analysts interested in match commentary, and those following the World Cup may find the diverse perspectives and ongoing discussions valuable.

Messages
19,907
Reaction score
10,915
We need a general thread to talk about all the matches. So here it is! Let's keep the discussion rolling during the matches too for those who are watching.

If you are interested in joining the PF World Cup Futbol League go here:
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=756611

First match is Brazil vs Croatia!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Brazil 1-1 Croatia at half

Brazil playing lazy in the beginning. I think they will turn it on for the win!
 
The penalty decision against Croatia was so wrong. Brazil does not deserve the second goal.
 
Yeah pretty bad dive. The game overall was quite entertaining. Brazil in the end deserved the win. Looking forward to a some good games tomorrow!
 
Croatia deserved a draw based on the pressure they laid on the Brazilian defense. Unfortunately they got another goal instead.
The keeper could've stopped the first and last goal I believe. A small step to the left/right before the dive would've done it both times.

But hey, congrats to Croatia for the mentality.
 
Terrible ref: that was never a penalty, and there was a foul in the run up to the third goal. Keeper should have saved the pen though. All in all, a shaky start from the hosts, though I expect them to get better.
 
First half of the Mex vs Cam game has been good. Mex called offside on two goals. Lots of rain.
 
Most of the Netherlands is colored orange, we're ready! :biggrin:
 
Greg Bernhardt said:
First half of the Mex vs Cam game has been good. Mex called offside on two goals.
Mexico deserved that win. It should have been 3-0 rather than 1-0. Both of those goals in the first half should have counted.

Lots of rain.
Lots of rain. Poor cameramen. The areas behind the field in which they were located were lakes.

Siting games in Natal was perhaps a mistake?

probability_of_precipitation_at_some_point_in_the_day_percent_pct.png

Source: http://weatherspark.com/averages/33461/Natal-Rio-Grande-do-Norte-Brazil

Belo Horizonte, OTOH, looks like a nice site for this time of year.
 
  • #10
wtf penalty?
 
  • #11
That was my thought in live play. In the replay it did look like De Vrij took Costa's feet out from under him.
 
  • #12
Are you happier now, Monique?
 
  • #13
goosebumps, beautiful goal!l
 
  • #14
Prettiest goal so far. Even prettier than Brazil's first goal. Unlike that nice looking goal by Brazil, van Persie's directed the ball into the opponent's net.
 
  • #15
D H said:
Siting games in Natal was perhaps a mistake?

probability_of_precipitation_at_some_point_in_the_day_percent_pct.png

Source: http://weatherspark.com/averages/33461/Natal-Rio-Grande-do-Norte-Brazil

Belo Horizonte, OTOH, looks like a nice site for this time of year.

I don't believe their data, based on what they say about where I live. The "snow" and "thunderstorms" data is nonsense. The rain data doesn't make much sense either.

The obvious unanswered question is what land area this is averaged over. Thunderstorms "somewhere in the UK" on 11% of days in July might be correct. Thunderstorms over one particular city is not.

probability_of_precipitation_at_some_point_in_the_day_percent_pct.png
 
  • #16
D H said:
That was my thought in live play. In the replay it did look like De Vrij took Costa's feet out from under him.
You must've seen a different replay, there was no faulplay. Costa searched for contact, it should be 0-1
 
  • #17
whohooo! who's the champion NOW? :D
 
  • #18
Holy **** - what a performance from holland!
 
  • #19
Monique said:
whohooo! who's the champion NOW? :D
Who knows? The Socceroos? That's an outcome I would have expected against Australia, not against Spain.
 
  • #20
Why did the Spaniards left their defense at home?
 
  • #21
Wow what an incredible game the Dutch had against Spain. Simply amazing
 
  • #22
:biggrin: *party*
 
  • #23
That was totally unbelievable!
 
  • #24
Monique said:
:biggrin: *party*

What is the atmosphere like in Holland?
 
  • #25
That...just...what just happened...
 
  • #26
Greg Bernhardt said:
What is the atmosphere like in Holland?
Exhilarating! It was going to be a difficult game and expectations were low. The plan was to play defensive, unlike the normal offensive game play for Holland and it panned out. For this game over 15000 people gathered on the museumsquare (picture not mine), so you can imagine the atmosphere:

http://www.at5.nl/imgcache/8/8ea160eed44bdddee78e9e98fff9598c.jpg

This is a great victory but it doesn't mean we'll win the next games, so we're looking forward to the next matches.

5PA1N:

BqCW0icCYAAbKea.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #27
So which of Spain or Chile is the one not to advance?
 
  • #28
why is their a team for England, and not labeled at UK?
 
  • #29
Maylis said:
why is their a team for England, and not labeled at UK?

Because that's what it is.

Wales reached the quarter-finals in 1958, the only time they qualified.
Scotland have qualified 8 times since 1954, but never got past the first round.
Northern Ireland have qualified 3 times, and also reached the quarter finals in 1958. (They also held the record of the least populous country to qualify, until Trinidad and Tobago qualified in 2006).

In 1958 all four "UK" teams qualified. Scotland and England were knocked out in the group stage. In the quarter-finals, Wales lost 1-0 to Brazil, and NI lost 4-0 to France.
 
Last edited:
  • #30
The world cup of plot twists, this should prove fun.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
303
Views
45K
  • · Replies 451 ·
16
Replies
451
Views
57K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K