Generic Form of Hermitian Matrix

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter thatboi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Quantum physics
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the generic form of a Hermitian matrix as presented in the thesis linked by the user. Specifically, the user seeks clarification on equation (2.5) regarding the bottom right element being denoted as ##\bar{A}##, which is tied to the Hermiticity of the matrix ##\mathcal{H}## and the commutation relation outlined in equation (2.4). The user expresses confusion about the relationship between Hermiticity and commutation relations, particularly in the context of the equation ##\mathcal{H}^{\dagger} = (\mathcal{M}a)^{\dagger}(a^{\dagger})^{\dagger} = a^{\dagger}\mathcal{M}^{\dagger}a##. The example provided with ##N=1## and the matrix ##M=\begin{pmatrix} 0&1\\1&2 \end{pmatrix}## illustrates a Hermitian operator, reinforcing the need for clarity on the underlying principles.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Hermitian matrices in quantum mechanics
  • Familiarity with commutation relations in linear algebra
  • Knowledge of matrix adjoints and their properties
  • Basic concepts of quantum operators and their representations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Hermitian matrices in quantum mechanics
  • Explore the implications of commutation relations on matrix representations
  • Review the concept of matrix adjoints and their role in operator theory
  • Investigate the specific examples of Hermitian operators in quantum field theory
USEFUL FOR

Researchers, students, and professionals in quantum mechanics, particularly those focusing on linear algebra applications in quantum theory and operator analysis.

thatboi
Messages
130
Reaction score
20
I am reading the following thesis: https://www.kip.uni-heidelberg.de/Veroeffentlichungen/download/6387/pdf-6387.pdf
Specifically, I am confused about equation (2.5), where they give the generic form of the matrix ##\mathcal{M}## due to the Hermiticity of ##\mathcal{H}## and the commutation relation (2.4). I am confused about why the bottom right element is ##\bar{A}##. I'm sure this is related to the commutation relation but I'm confused as to how they enter into the picture. ##\mathcal{H}^{\dagger} = (\mathcal{M}a)^{\dagger}(a^{\dagger})^{\dagger} = a^{\dagger}\mathcal{M}^{\dagger}a## so where do the commutation relations come from or what step did I skip?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, something is missing, because I can take ##N=1## and ##M=\begin{pmatrix} 0&1\\1&2 \end{pmatrix}##, which make ##H=a^\dagger a^\dagger + aa+2aa^\dagger##, which is hermitian.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: thatboi

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 77 ·
3
Replies
77
Views
9K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K