Calculating Geometric Mean Annual Increase: Cable TV Subscribers 1990-2000

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The geometric mean annual increase of cable TV subscribers from 1990 to 2000 is calculated using the formula \( x = (54.87/9.19)^{1/10} \), resulting in an annual percentage increase of approximately 19.56%. The initial incorrect calculations of 22.46 million and 19.56% were clarified to distinguish between geometric mean and arithmetic mean. The arithmetic mean annual increase is 4.569 million, derived from the total increase of 45.68 million over 10 years. Understanding the difference between geometric and arithmetic means is crucial for accurate calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of geometric mean and arithmetic mean concepts
  • Basic knowledge of percentage calculations
  • Familiarity with algebraic manipulation and exponentiation
  • Ability to interpret statistical data over time
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the calculation of geometric means in financial contexts
  • Learn about the implications of using arithmetic versus geometric means in data analysis
  • Explore the concept of compound annual growth rate (CAGR)
  • Research statistical methods for analyzing subscriber growth trends
USEFUL FOR

Statisticians, financial analysts, data scientists, and anyone involved in analyzing growth trends in subscription-based services will benefit from this discussion.

PARAJON
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I have a question that I would like your assistance to see if I have the correct info:


In 1990 there were 9.19 million cable TV subscribers. By 2000 the number of subscribers increased to 54.87 million. What is the geometric mean annual increase for the period ?


Answer:

(9.19*54.87)^(1/2) = 22.46 million


I would appreciate your help in this matter to come up with the correct answer.

I also have another possible answer of 19.56%


Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Neither of those answers has any hope of being correct.

In the first case, "(9.19*54.87)^(1/2) = 22.46 million" you are averaging the number of viewers, not the annual increase in the number of viewers.
In the second case, you have a percentage and the problem asks for "annual increase" not percentage annual increase.

IF the problem had asked for "arithmetic" mean (or just "mean") it would be easy: the total increase from 1990 to 2000 is 54.87- 9.19= 45.68 million which would be a mean annual increase for those 10 years of 45.68/10= 4.569 million.

Letting a1, a2, ... , an, be the actual annual increase, you want a number a such that a1*a2*...*a10= a10 AND a1+ ...+ a10= 45.68. Since sums and products don't combine nicely, I don't see any way of getting that.
 
the 19.56% answer is the annual increase.

9.19 * x^10 = 54.87
x = (54.87/9.19)^(1/10)

which is 1.195644 ~ 19.56%.

22.46 is the geometric mean of 9.19 and 54.87 but i don't see how that is important here.
 
Take the ratio (R) of no. of 2000 over no. in 1990. The answer you want is R1/10. I'll let you do the arithmetic.
 
"the 19.56% answer is the annual increase."

No, it's the annual percentage increase. The (arithmetic) mean annual increase is 4.569 million as I said. There's a big difference.

"Take the ratio (R) of no. of 2000 over no. in 1990. The answer you want is R1/10. I'll let you do the arithmetic."
That is 1.1956= "1+r" where r is the annual percentage increase. I don't see how that could be called the "geometric mean annual increase".
 
HallsofIvy said:
No, it's the annual percentage increase.

you are right, of course :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K