Geometric progression related problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter Saitama
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Geometric
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves three distinct real numbers in geometric progression, where the sum of their squares equals ##S^2## and their sum equals ##\alpha S##. The objective is to show that ##\alpha^2## lies within the intervals (1/3,1) or (1,3).

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the formulation of equations based on the geometric progression and explore methods to eliminate variables while solving for ##\alpha^2##. There is a focus on manipulating the equations to derive a quadratic or rational expression.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing various approaches to the problem. Some have suggested dividing equations to simplify the expressions, while others are questioning the conditions under which the discriminant should be evaluated. There is recognition of the need to consider the distinctness of the numbers involved.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that certain values of ##r## (specifically 0, 1, and -1) must be excluded to maintain the distinctness of the three terms in the geometric progression, which impacts the possible values of ##\alpha^2##.

Saitama
Messages
4,244
Reaction score
93

Homework Statement


The sum of the squares of three distinct real numbers, which are in geometric progression is ##S^2##. If their sum is ##\alpha S##, show that ##\alpha^2 \in (1/3,1) \cup (1,3)##.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


Let the three numbers be ##a , \, ar, \,ar^2##. According to the question
$$a^2+a^2r^2+a^2r^4=S^2 \, (*)$$
and
$$a+ar+ar^2=\alpha S \, (**)$$
Squaring (**), I get
$$a^2+a^2r^2+a^2r^4+2a^2r+2a^2r^3+2a^2r^2=\alpha^2S^2$$
From (*)
$$S^2+2a^2r(1+r+r^2)=\alpha^2S^2$$
The equation (**) can rewritten as ##a(1+r+r^2)=\alpha S##. Using this
$$S^2+2ar(\alpha S)=\alpha^2S^2 \Rightarrow S+2a\alpha r=\alpha^2S$$
I am stuck here.

Any help is appreciated. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have the two equations
\begin{align*}
\alpha S &= a(1+r+r^2) \\
S^2 &= a^2(1+r^2+r^4)
\end{align*} Can you see how you might solve for ##\alpha^2## while eliminating ##S## and ##a## at the same time?
 
After squaring eq (**) don't open the expression.Instead divide it by eq (*).This will eliminate 'S' and 'a' simultaneously.

Now,the tricky part .You can write
1+r2+r4 = (1+r+r2)(1-r+r2).

This will eliminate the expression (1+r+r2) from Nr and Dr.

You are now left with a quadratic equation in r2.Now in order to have a real value of 'r' the condition is ? I am sure you know this :smile:
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Tanya Sharma said:
After squaring eq (**) don't open the expression.Instead divide it by eq (*).This will eliminate 'S' and 'a' simultaneously.

Now,the tricky part .You can write
1+r2+r4 = (1+r+r2)(1-r+r2).

This will eliminate the expression (1+r+r2) from Nr and Dr.

You are now left with a quadratic equation in r2.Now in order to have a real value of 'r' the condition is ? I am sure you know this :smile:

I get the following quadratic:
$$r^2(\alpha^2-1)-r(\alpha^2+1)+\alpha^2-1=0$$
I know I have to deal with discriminant here but do I have to use D>=0 or D>0 (D is discriminant)? I have tried using both of them and D>0 gives the correct answer but why not D>=0? :confused:
 
You're supposed to be solving for ##\alpha^2##, so you actually have a linear equation on your hands there. [strike]But how'd you get that? It's not correct.[/strike] Tanya basically told you how to do the whole problem.
 
Last edited:
vela said:
You're supposed to be solving for ##\alpha^2##, so you actually have a linear equation on your hands there. But how'd you get that? It's not correct. Tanya basically told you how to do the whole problem.

Yes I know I have to solve for ##\alpha^2## but Tanya also said that I would end up with quadratic in r. Is what I have written incorrect? From the quadratic, ##\alpha^2 \neq 1##, the other values of ##\alpha^2## can be found out using the fact that D is greater than zero for the quadratic. My doubt is why not use D>=0? D>=0 gives 3 and 1/3 as possible solutions for ##\alpha^2## while the given answer does not include them. How am I supposed to know if I have to use D>=0 or D>0? I hope you understand my query.
 
Sorry, your previous result was right. (I made the algebra mistake.)

You actually don't get a quadratic; you should get a rational expression. Try plotting your result for ##\alpha^2## as a function of r.
 
vela said:
You actually don't get a quadratic; you should get a rational expression. Try plotting your result for ##\alpha^2## as a function of r.

##\alpha^2=\frac{1+r+r^2}{1-r+r^2}##

I plotted this on Wolfram|Alpha: http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=y=(1+x+x^2)/(1-x+x^2)
I have replaced ##\alpha^2## with y and r with x. It gives the result that range of y or ##\alpha^2## is [1/3,3] which is incorrect.

What's wrong with my method of evaluating the discriminant? I don't think the given problem requires me to do curve-sketching.
 
You have to consider the allowed values of r. Not every value of r will satisfy the requirements stated in the first sentence of the problem. That will rule both of the D=0 roots.

From the graph, it's easy to see why two values of ##\alpha^2## should be excluded.
 
  • #10
vela said:
You have to consider the allowed values of r. Not every value of r will satisfy the requirements stated in the first sentence of the problem. That will rule both of the D=0 roots.

From the graph, it's easy to see why two values of ##\alpha^2## should be excluded.

I think I understand it. r cannot be equal to 0,1 and -1 because for these values, the three terms won't be distinct. So 1,3 and 1/3 are excluded.

Thanks a lot vela and Tanya! :)
 
  • #11
You got it.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
3K