Geometric Series Convergence and Divergence

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the convergence and divergence of geometric series, specifically examining the series defined by the terms An = 1/2^n. Participants explore the implications of different interpretations of the series and the application of the convergence formula.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant states that a geometric series converges to a/(1-r) when r<1, using the example of An = 1/2^n, which they interpret as converging to 2.
  • Another participant provides the explicit sums of the series, showing that ∑(1/2^n) converges to 1 and ∑(1/2^(n-1)) converges to 2.
  • A third participant asserts that both series are equal, using the formula for the total infinite sum and concluding that the first sum converges to 1.
  • There is a repeated expression of confusion regarding the different results obtained from the two interpretations of the series.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the convergence results of the series, with no consensus reached on which interpretation is correct.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved assumptions regarding the manipulation of the series terms and the application of the convergence formula, leading to different conclusions about the sums.

Drakkith
Mentor
Messages
23,205
Reaction score
7,687
I'm a little confused on geometric series.

My book says that a geometric series is a series of the type: n=1 to ∞, ∑arn-1
If r<1 the series converges to a/(1-r), otherwise the series diverges.

So let's say we have a series: n=1 to ∞, ∑An, with An = 1/2n
An can be re-written as (1/2)n, which apparently makes it a geometric series with r=1/2. This converges to 1/(1-1/2) = 1/(1/2) = 2.

However, I was under the assumption that I was supposed to factor out a 1/2 to make the series ∑1/2(1/2)n-1.
This would converge to (1/2)/(1-1/2) = (1/2)/(1/2) = 1.

Why are these different? Which one is correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
##\displaystyle \sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{1}{2^n} = \frac{1}{2} +\frac{1}{4}+\frac{1}{8}+ \cdots =1##
##\displaystyle \sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{1}{2^{n-1}} =1 +\frac{1}{2} +\frac{1}{4}+\frac{1}{8}+ \cdots=2##
 
The formule for the total infinite sum is: u1/(1-r)

So, for the first sum, u1 = 1/2, and r = 1/2, so (1/2)/(1-1/2) = 1 and not 2.

So both series are equal.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Ian Taylor
Drakkith said:
I'm a little confused on geometric series.

My book says that a geometric series is a series of the type: n=1 to ∞, ∑arn-1
We have some very nice MathJax notation for this :oldbiggrin:
$$\sum_{n = 1}^{\infty}ar^{n - 1}$$

The script I wrote is \sum_{n = 1}^{\infty}ar^{n - 1}, with a pair of $ characters at the beginning and end.
Drakkith said:
If r<1 the series converges to a/(1-r), otherwise the series diverges.

So let's say we have a series: n=1 to ∞, ∑An, with An = 1/2n
An can be re-written as (1/2)n, which apparently makes it a geometric series with r=1/2. This converges to 1/(1-1/2) = 1/(1/2) = 2.

However, I was under the assumption that I was supposed to factor out a 1/2 to make the series ∑1/2(1/2)n-1.
This would converge to (1/2)/(1-1/2) = (1/2)/(1/2) = 1.

Why are these different? Which one is correct?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Drakkith

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K