Geometry - Help with theorem proof please

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a theorem in geometry concerning the relationship between points A, B, C, and D, specifically addressing the condition that if the ray from A to B is equal to the ray from C to D, then A must equal C. Participants are exploring the definitions and implications of rays and the concept of points being between one another.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to clarify the definitions of rays and the relationships between points. Questions about the implications of A being in the ray from C to D and the conditions under which points are considered to be between one another are raised. Some participants suggest using different notations to avoid confusion.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing hints and asking probing questions to guide the original poster's understanding. There is a recognition of the need to establish contradictions based on the assumptions made about the points A and C.

Contextual Notes

Participants are grappling with the definitions of geometric terms and the implications of those definitions in the context of the theorem. There is an ongoing exploration of the relationships between points in a metric geometry framework, and some definitions are questioned for clarity.

Lee33
Messages
156
Reaction score
0
Geometry -- Help with theorem proof please

Homework Statement



Let ##A,B,C,D## be points. If ##\vec{AB} = \vec{CD}## then ##A=C##.

Homework Equations



None

The Attempt at a Solution



This question was a theorem in my book that wasn't proved. I am wondering how to prove it?

It is saying that the vertex ##A## must equal ##C## if the ray ##\vec{AB} = \vec{CD}##.

The definition I have for ray is:

##\vec{AB} = \vec{AB} \cup \{ C \in P \ | \ A-B-C\}.## Where ##A-B-C## means ##B## is between ##A## and ##C##. And ##P## is the set of points.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Lee33! :smile:

(your definition doesn't look quite correct)

Suppose A ≠ C

A is in ##\vec{CD}##, so … ? :wink:
 
tiny-tim - Can you elaborate a bit more please?
 
Hi Lee33! :smile:

Apply the definition you were given …
Lee33 said:
The definition I have for ray is:

##\vec{AB} = \vec{AB} \cup \{ C \in P \ | \ A-B-C\}.## Where ##A-B-C## means ##B## is between ##A## and ##C##. And ##P## is the set of points.

Suppose A ≠ C

C is in ##\vec{AB}##, so what can you say about A B and C ? :wink:
 
If C is in ##\vec{AB}## and ##C\ne A## then B is between A and C?
 
Lee33 said:
The definition I have for ray is:

##\vec{AB} = \vec{AB} \cup \{ C \in P \ | \ A-B-C\}.## Where ##A-B-C## means ##B## is between ##A## and ##C##. And ##P## is the set of points.
This definition makes no sense to me. First off, why would ##\vec{AB}## be equal to itself union some other thing (unless the other thing happened to be the empty set).

Second, how do you interpret ##\{ C \in P \ | \ A-B-C\}##? Does | have its usual meaning of "such that" or am I missing something? An explanation, in words, would be helpful.

Third, where are these points? Are they on a line or are they in the plane?

Fourth, how do you get that A - B - C means that B is between A and C?
 
Sorry, I will elaborate.

First question: If A and B are distinct points in a metric geometry then the line segment from A to B is the set ##\vec{AB}=\{C \in P \ | \ A-C-B \ or \ C = A \ or \ C = B\}##.

If A and B are distinct points in a metric geometry then the ray from A toward B is the set ##\vec{AB}=\vec{AB}\cup \{C\in P \ | \ A-B-C\}.##

Second question: Yes, it means such that. Let P be the set of points in a metric geometry, and let C be a point in P such that B is between A and C.

Third question: They are on a line.

Fourth: That is just a notation for convenience. ##A-B-C## just means B is between A and C.

I will add the definition of between-ness: B is between A and C if the distance ##d(A,B)+d(B,C) = d(A,C)##.
 
Hi Lee33! :smile:

(just got up :zzz:)
Lee33 said:
If C is in ##\vec{AB}## and ##C\ne A## then B is between A and C?

nooo, C is (strictly) between A and B :wink:

ok, and if A is in ##\vec{CD}##, then … ? :smile:
 
If A is in ##\vec{CD}## then A is between C and D.
 
  • #10
Lee33 said:
If A is in ##\vec{CD}## then A is between C and D.

yes (strictly between) :smile:

ok, now you have two statements, and you should be able to prove a contradiction (thereby showing that "A ≠ C" was false) :wink:

(drawing yourself a diagram might help)
 
  • #11
Alright thanks for the help! I will use your hints.

Question. Do I use both statements in my proof? That is, suppose ##A\ne C## and A is in ##\vec{CD}## then A is bewteen C and D. Also, I will use if ##A\ne C## and C is in ##\vec{AB}## then C is between A and B?
 
  • #12
Lee33 said:
Question. Do I use both statements in my proof? That is, suppose ##A\ne C## and A is in ##\vec{CD}## then A is bewteen C and D. Also, I will use if ##A\ne C## and C is in ##\vec{AB}## then C is between A and B?

yes :smile:
 
  • #13
You are using the same notation for line segment and ray, and it's confusing the bejeesus out of the people who are trying to help you.

Might I suggest ##\overline{AB}## for the segment and ##\overrightarrow{AB}## for the ray so that ##\overrightarrow{AB}=\overline{AB}\cup \{C\in P \ | \ A-B-C\}.##
 
  • #14
gopher_p said:
… it's confusing the bejeesus out of the people who are trying to help you.

it's not confusing me :smile:
 
  • #15
tiny-tim said:
it's not confusing me :smile:

Are you sure? :confused: Like, really sure? :cool: Because when Lee asked

Lee33 said:
If C is in ##\vec{AB}## and ##C\ne A## then B is between A and C?

you replied

tiny-tim said:
nooo, C is (strictly) between A and B :wink:

which is generally false :mad: regardless of which of Lee's two definitions of ##\vec{AB}## you're using. :-p
 
  • #16
gopher_p said:
… which is generally false …

well, Lee33 :smile: didn't contradict me, sooo i assume i got it right! o:)
 
  • #17
gopher_p - Sorry about that, you're right!

tiny-tim - If ##A\ne C## then ##C\in \vec{AB}## thus ##A-C-B## but where will the point ##D## be?
 
  • #18
but you haven't used …
Lee33 said:
If A is in ##\vec{CD}## then A is between C and D.
 
  • #19
So my proof should go like this:

Suppose ##A\ne C##, now since ##\vec{AB}=\vec{CD}## then ##A\in \vec{CD}## and ##C\in \vec{AB}##. Thus ##C-A-D## and ##A-C-B## which is a contradiction?
 
  • #20
yes!

if I'm understanding the terminology correctly, you can't have both ##A-C## and ##C-A## unless C = A :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
  • #21
Thank you very much for the help!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K