A Geometry Topology and Physics: Nakahara, Chapt. 1: Weyl Ordering

  • A
  • Thread starter Thread starter XiYi
  • Start date Start date
XiYi
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
In the text, the author try to deduce proposition 1.2, here is the detail (all in one dimention):
1750142614926.webp

1750142649380.webp

1750142696918.webp

1750142714484.webp

My question is the last line of formula, how to deduce it from the previous line? Here is a note of the author:

1750142979727.webp

I understand the similar part of Srednicki QFT at chap 6 and I could get the point of nakahara, but can't seize the logic. It bother me a lot. Thanks for giving help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Trotter splits ##e^{−i(T+V)ε}## into “purely kinetic” and “purely potential”.
The Gaussian integral yields the leading term ##exp[im(x−y)^2/(2ε)]## and normalization.
Taylor potential around the midpoint 𝑧=(𝑥+𝑦)/2 yields −iεV((x+y)/2) plus ##𝑂(𝜀(𝑥−𝑦)^2)##.
All remaining inconsistencies are ##𝑂(ε^2)##.
Weyl ordering — to emphasize that the Hamiltonian is arranged symmetrically, and when moving to the end of the integral over phase space, exactly the average value of the potential 𝑉 appears on the segment between 𝑥 and 𝑦.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top