Graduate Geometry Topology and Physics: Nakahara, Chapt. 1: Weyl Ordering

  • Thread starter Thread starter XiYi
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on deducing a specific line from a formula in Nakahara's text on Weyl ordering in quantum mechanics. The author notes the challenge in grasping the logic behind the deduction despite understanding related concepts from Srednicki's QFT. Key points include Trotter's method of splitting the exponential operator into kinetic and potential components, leading to a Gaussian integral that produces a significant term. The Taylor expansion of the potential around the midpoint introduces corrections, while remaining inconsistencies are classified as higher-order terms. The emphasis on Weyl ordering highlights the symmetric arrangement of the Hamiltonian, ensuring the average potential value is accurately represented in the integral.
XiYi
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
In the text, the author try to deduce proposition 1.2, here is the detail (all in one dimention):
1750142614926.webp

1750142649380.webp

1750142696918.webp

1750142714484.webp

My question is the last line of formula, how to deduce it from the previous line? Here is a note of the author:

1750142979727.webp

I understand the similar part of Srednicki QFT at chap 6 and I could get the point of nakahara, but can't seize the logic. It bother me a lot. Thanks for giving help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Trotter splits ##e^{−i(T+V)ε}## into “purely kinetic” and “purely potential”.
The Gaussian integral yields the leading term ##exp[im(x−y)^2/(2ε)]## and normalization.
Taylor potential around the midpoint 𝑧=(𝑥+𝑦)/2 yields −iεV((x+y)/2) plus ##𝑂(𝜀(𝑥−𝑦)^2)##.
All remaining inconsistencies are ##𝑂(ε^2)##.
Weyl ordering — to emphasize that the Hamiltonian is arranged symmetrically, and when moving to the end of the integral over phase space, exactly the average value of the potential 𝑉 appears on the segment between 𝑥 and 𝑦.
 
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • Sticky
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
11K
Replies
26
Views
18K
  • · Replies 150 ·
6
Replies
150
Views
23K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K