Gerard 't Hooft's Probing Canonical Quantum Gravity

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter John86
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Paper
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Gerard 't Hooft's paper, "Probing the small distance structure of canonical quantum gravity," proposes a novel approach to canonical quantum gravity by integrating over the local conformal factor before other functional integrals. This method aims to yield a conformally invariant and finite effective theory, although it faces challenges due to divergences in the conformal integral and potential unitarity violations. The paper discusses the implications of renormalization counter terms and presents calculations involving matter fields, ultimately suggesting that quantized particles may interact with a "partly classical" gravitational field. This exploration seeks to reconcile Hawking radiation with principles of unitarity and locality.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of canonical quantum gravity concepts
  • Familiarity with functional integrals in quantum field theory
  • Knowledge of renormalization techniques and unitarity in quantum mechanics
  • Basic principles of quantum chromodynamics (QCD) and asymptotic freedom
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of conformal invariance in quantum gravity theories
  • Study the role of renormalization counter terms in quantum field theory
  • Explore the relationship between Hawking radiation, unitarity, and locality
  • Investigate the concept of asymptotic freedom in quantum chromodynamics (QCD)
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, researchers in quantum gravity, and students of theoretical physics interested in advanced concepts of quantum mechanics and gravitational interactions.

John86
Messages
257
Reaction score
9
This paper by 't Hooft looks interesting, I would like to hear some thoughts and comments !.

http://arxiv.org/abs/1009.0669
Probing the small distance structure of canonical quantum gravity using the conformal group
Authors: Gerard 't Hooft
(Submitted on 3 Sep 2010)
Abstract: In canonical quantum gravity, the formal functional integral includes an integration over the local conformal factor, and we propose to perform the functional integral over this factor before doing any of the other functional integrals. By construction, the resulting effective theory would be expected to be conformally invariant and therefore finite. However, also the conformal integral itself diverges, and therefore the actual situation is more delicate. The effects of a renormalization counter term are considered, including the associated problem of unitarity violation, such as a Landau-like ghost. Adding (massive or massless) matter fields does not change the picture; to confirm this, detailed calculations were necessary, and they are presented. Some alternative ideas are offered, including a more daring speculation, which is that no counter term should be allowed for at all. This has far-reaching and important consequences, which we discuss. A surprising picture emerges of quantized elementary particles interacting with a gravitational field that is "partly classical". This approach was inspired by a search towards the reconciliation of Hawking radiation with unitarity and locality, and it offers basic new insights there.

I liked his statements about the emergence of quantum mechanics at page 12.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I like that his conclusions actually point out his own uncertainties and ambiguities of the mathematics. Sounds more like an intial foray with loose ends rather than a firm and final analysis.
 
By coincidence I just came across this from wikipedia:

Asymptotic freedom is a feature of quantum chromodynamics (QCD), the quantum field theory of the interactions of quarks and gluons which was discovered in 1973 by David Gross and Frank Wilczek, and by David Politzer. Although these authors were the first to understand the physical relevance to the strong interactions, in 1969 Iosif Khriplovich discovered asymptotic freedom in the SU(2) gauge theory as a mathematical curiosity, and Gerardus 't Hooft in 1972 also noted the effect but did not publish. For their discovery, Gross, Wilczek and Politzer were awarded the Nobel Prize in Physics in 2004.

So maybe t'Hooft has decided "better to publish" some incomplete but new insightsthan to be overlooked?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
7K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K