MHB Get a Detailed Proof of Stirling's Formula

  • Thread starter Thread starter Pratibha
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formula
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on obtaining a detailed proof of Stirling's formula, particularly in relation to the gamma function. The user references "Principles of Mathematical Analysis" by Walter Rudin, noting that it contains shortcuts that are difficult to follow. Another participant suggests the Wikipedia page on Stirling's formula, which offers two proofs and links to additional details for the omitted steps. This indicates that while Rudin's text is foundational, supplementary resources are necessary for a comprehensive understanding.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Stirling's formula and its applications
  • Familiarity with the gamma function
  • Basic knowledge of mathematical analysis
  • Ability to follow proofs in advanced mathematics texts
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the Wikipedia page on Stirling's formula for detailed proofs
  • Study the gamma function and its properties
  • Read "Principles of Mathematical Analysis" by Walter Rudin for foundational concepts
  • Investigate additional mathematical analysis resources for clearer explanations of shortcuts
USEFUL FOR

Students of mathematics, particularly those studying analysis, researchers interested in the gamma function, and anyone seeking a deeper understanding of Stirling's formula.

Pratibha
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
hey, can someone suggest where will a get a detailed proof of stirling's formula (related with gamma function). I read it from PRINCIPLES OF MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS Walter Rudin,but in it many shortcut steps are there, which is either beyond my knowledge, or i m not getting it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Pratibha said:
hey, can someone suggest where will a get a detailed proof of stirling's formula (related with gamma function). I read it from PRINCIPLES OF MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS Walter Rudin,but in it many shortcut steps are there, which is either beyond my knowledge, or i m not getting it.
The Wikipedia page on Stirling's formula gives two proofs. They are not completely free of shortcuts, but they provide links to details of all the missing steps.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K