Get rid of transuranians in Liquid Fluoride Thorium Reactors?

  • Thread starter Thread starter kiskrof
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Liquid
Click For Summary
Liquid Fluoride Thorium Reactors (LFTR) are gaining attention as a potential energy source, yet there is skepticism about their feasibility and the exaggerated claims surrounding them. LFTRs could theoretically eliminate transuranic waste from traditional nuclear technologies by reprocessing it, but the economic viability and technical challenges of this process remain uncertain. The discussion highlights that while LFTRs offer advantages such as online reprocessing and lower plutonium production, they also face significant hurdles, including the need for extensive chemical processing and concerns over radioactive waste management. The timeline for effectively utilizing LFTRs to address existing plutonium stockpiles is debated, with estimates suggesting it could take centuries. Overall, while LFTRs present an intriguing concept for future energy solutions, their practical implementation is fraught with complexities.
  • #61
Astronuc said:
Atmospheric pressure at the top of the highest point in the primary system, but going down to the bottom of the core under a few meters of the liquid fuel, the pressure will be greater by ρgh, so the bottom of the core will be several atmospheres. I imagine there will be some kind of containment to collect the radioactive gases and volatiles in the event of the break in the primary system, and particularly where the steam generator is located, since the steam pressure is likely to be on the order of 900 to 1000 psi. A steam-fluorine reaction would be problematic with respect to HF gas.

Note that a commercial scale has not yet been constructed let alone designed. As far as I know, none of the promoters/advocates in the US have designed or constructed any type of nuclear plant.

The pgh at the bottom of a salt tank would be on a liquid, which if exposed via a leak would have no phase change flash. A secondary salt loop is usually considered, so that if a Rankine cycle is used eventually involving steam there is no radioactivity involved . Given the high temperatures afforded by a lftr core, a Brayton cycle seems likely. In any case, containment would not have the problem of dealing with high pressure (300atm) gases.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 212 ·
8
Replies
212
Views
77K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
Replies
18
Views
10K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
19K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K