Getting into financial industry from physics

  • Thread starter Thread starter acpsiddhartha
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Industry Physics
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the potential for physics graduates to enter the financial industry, particularly in quantitative roles. Participants explore the relevance of a physics background, the necessity of additional finance knowledge, and the importance of programming skills. The conversation also touches on the perceptions of finance compared to physics and the job market dynamics for international students.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that physics students may be more intelligent than finance students, but finance students might have more current knowledge.
  • There is a belief that obtaining a professional designation could enhance job prospects in finance, although the specific requirements for quantitative roles are unclear.
  • Concerns are raised about the complexity of finance, with some arguing it can be more challenging than physics, depending on individual motivation.
  • Several participants mention the mathematical rigor involved in finance, citing specific texts and concepts that illustrate the complexity of the field.
  • One participant shares a personal anecdote about a classmate securing a position as a trainee securities analyst, suggesting that it is feasible for physics graduates to enter the field.
  • There is a discussion about the applicability of financial theories in real-world scenarios, with some expressing skepticism about their practical relevance.
  • Participants note that while some roles in finance do not require a specific degree, strong analytical and programming skills are essential.
  • There is a distinction made between personal financial advising and quantitative roles typically pursued by physics graduates, with the latter focusing on mathematical modeling.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the ease of transitioning from physics to finance, the necessity of additional qualifications, and the relevance of financial theories. No consensus is reached on these points, indicating a variety of perspectives and experiences.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the variability in job market conditions and the importance of personal motivation and background in determining success in the financial sector. The discussion also reflects differing opinions on the complexity and intuitiveness of finance compared to physics.

acpsiddhartha
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
hey
I hard that many financial companies hire physics students for quantitative jobs. how much is that true. and I also hard that they hire students from top 10 univs only. how much true is this? If I get some background in finance and develop skilll in c/c++ is there any chance to get into financial sector after Physics PhD from somewhere in 50 ranking university? I am an international student, so that is also to be considered.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
finance is easy. Id assume so. I think a physics student would on average be smarter than a finance student just the finance student might be more up to date in their knowledge. Maybe you could study part time in finance and look for work or do an overload of units in finance.

Im not an employer though that is just my opinion of people who study physics.
 
No one cares if you're an international student. Just make sure you have a visa or something to work.

To make it anywhere in the finance sector, I'd recommend getting a professional designation, and let the requirements of those designations dictate what you should take. I'm not from the US, but I don't think there are designations for just quantitative work. Even if there isn't, for competitive reasons, it would probably be good to get one if it's not too much work. Some places will hire you if you're in the process of getting one, so you don't have to wait until you're done.
 
JimmyJockstrap said:
finance is easy. Id assume so. I think a physics student would on average be smarter than a finance student just the finance student might be more up to date in their knowledge. Maybe you could study part time in finance and look for work or do an overload of units in finance.

Im not an employer though that is just my opinion of people who study physics.

PS. Finance is not easy.
 
relative to physics imo
 
JimmyJockstrap said:
relative to physics imo
Depends on the level of finance. It can get very mathematical and complex.
 
JimmyJockstrap said:
relative to physics imo


Look at the book "schochastic calculus of variation for mathematical finance" bu P. Malliavin. The mathematics in that book shall surely make you cry the first time.
 
I saw few pages of a finance book. it is full of sooooooo much complecated math, it seemed very difficult. I don't want to compare with physics. real understanding of physics is also not easy... anyway finance is never easy, that's for sure.
 
The whole field of computational/quantitative finance may be mathematically elegant (i.e. put call parity, and Black-Scholes). But it really doesn't have any applications in the real world (all of the theories). They work only under special conditions.
 
  • #10
Finance isn't as intuitive as physics so in that way it may be harder. It also depends on the person's motivation. A higher motivation to do something can make something look easy.
 
  • #12
Someone in my classes has just been accepted by Barclays as a trainee securities analyst for £38k with little effort, so yes it can be done, they just want very bright people who work hard and catch on to concepts quickly.
 
  • #13
Consider http://www.poplarware.com/personal/lptodo.html as an example. On the linked page she writes:

Finance/Wall Street: Derivatives pricing, strategies for trading, trading, analysis, research, programming. I have it on good authority (from a recruiter: Jennifer Levin, whose email address is "jlevin" at her company's domain "optionsgroup.com") (I leave it as an exercise for the reader to put the email address together -- she invites you to contact her if you are hunting for this type of job) that Wall Street firms are still hiring masters and PhD graduates in physics, math, engineering, and other fields. You will need to have a good programming background, but not necessarily a background in finance. The job market on Wall Street fluctuates with the stock, bond, and commodities markets, however, so at any given time it is hard to say how easy it will be to find a position. I worked on Wall Street for two years, and for me, the stress and long hours were too much to be made up for by the excellent financial compensation. Others are willing to make the tradeoff, and I even know one person (a mathematician) who actually enjoys working there.

She has more detail elsewhere if you are willing to dig for it.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #14
From the Bureau of Labor Statistics
Employers usually do not require a specific field of study for personal financial advisors, but a bachelor’s degree in accounting, finance, economics, business, mathematics, or law provides good preparation for the occupation. Courses in investments, taxes, estate planning, and risk management also are helpful. Programs in financial planning are becoming more widely available in colleges and universities. Working for a broker-dealer is a good way to gain experience that can help individuals pass the security license exams needed to practice financial planning...Mathematical, computer, analytical, and problem-solving skills are essential qualifications for financial analysts and personal financial advisors. Good communication skills also are necessary, because these workers must present complex financial concepts and strategies in easy-to-understand language to clients and other professionals. Self-confidence, maturity, and the ability to work independently are important as well. Financial analysts must be detail oriented, motivated to seek out obscure information, and familiar with the workings of the economy, tax laws, and money markets. Strong interpersonal skills and sales ability are crucial to the success of both financial analysts and personal financial advisors.

Although not required for financial analysts or personal financial advisors to practice, certification can enhance one’s professional standing and is strongly recommended by many employers. Financial analysts may receive the Chartered Financial Analyst (CFA) designation, sponsored by the CFA Institute . To qualify for this designation, applicants need a bachelor’s degree and 3 years of work experience in a related field and must pass a series of three examinations...Personal financial advisors may obtain the Certified Financial Planner credential, often referred to as CFP (R), demonstrating extensive training and competency in financial planning. This certification, issued by the Certified Financial Planner Board of Standards, requires relevant experience, the completion of education requirements, passing a comprehensive examination, and adherence to an enforceable code of ethics.
 
  • #15
Daveb,

That appears to be the information for a personal financial planner. This is not what most physicists who end up in the financial sector do - most of them work on mathematical models to improve yields in trading various commodities.
 
  • #16
Yes, well finance is a rather large and all encompassing field, so i just went with what the BLS had listed for financial analysts. If you're talking about mathematical modeling, they really like mathematicians (I was actively being recruited with only a BS in math/physics from UCLA for such positions, but that's not what I wanted to do).
 
  • #17
tronter said:
The whole field of computational/quantitative finance may be mathematically elegant (i.e. put call parity, and Black-Scholes). But it really doesn't have any applications in the real world (all of the theories). They work only under special conditions.

If Black-Scholes no longer has any applications in the real world, it is only because the state of the art has moved on from there. But when I did my brief stint on Wall Street around 1990, everyone and his uncle was busily working on refinements and applications of Black-Scholes pricing models.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K