Getting Stuck on Bends Coefficients - Math Equation Help Needed

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of coefficients for bends in fluid mechanics equations, specifically in the context of calculating head loss in piping systems. Participants are seeking clarification on how to incorporate these coefficients into their calculations and whether their equations are correct.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about how to use the coefficients for bends in their calculations and questions the placement of these coefficients in the equation.
  • Another participant explains that the coefficients represent an equivalent length of pipe that accounts for energy loss due to fittings, suggesting that these should be summed in the calculations.
  • A participant shares their experience of obtaining unexpected results when applying the coefficients and questions the validity of their calculations based on different lengths and flow rates.
  • A later reply provides a detailed energy equation that incorporates head loss and minor loss coefficients, indicating a method to calculate the total head loss in the system.
  • One participant confirms that they arrived at a head loss value that seems reasonable after using the provided equation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not appear to reach a consensus on the correct application of the coefficients, as there are differing results and interpretations of the equations used. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the accuracy of the calculations and the proper use of coefficients.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference specific equations and coefficients but do not clarify all assumptions or dependencies, leaving some mathematical steps unresolved. There is also a mention of differing flow rates affecting the outcomes, which may influence the calculations.

VMS1
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
hi, I've been searching around the site and found it pretty useful but I'm having a pretty tough time with a few questions i have

its pretty much the same as This

but the coefficient values are different, the problem I'm having is with the coefficients for the bends, could someone please explain what I'm meant to do with them? and where they go in the equation ?

also I'm using the equation H = 4f *(l/d) * (v^2/19.6) is this right ?

cheers for any help guys :smile:
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Fittings can be assigned an equivalent length for pipe of the same diameter.
 
Like Astronuc said, the coefficients for the bends and restrictions are a method of calculating an equivalent straight run length of pipe that would provide the same energy loss as the fitting. If you look at post #3 in the thread you referenced you will see that they are summed up. That same post also shows the end result of the equation used. It is a modified form of the Bernoulli equation to provide loss terms for frictional effects.
 
Ahh right that makes more sense now, i tried it using the coefficient values in that equation and as you can probably guess got some stupid answer lol

if i try and use the equation i quoted i won't get the right answer ?

thanks for the help

Edit: ok I've just tried it using the Eqn in the thread i referenced and got a head of 12.35m if i use L=50m, if i use L=80m (50m plus the equivalent lengths) i get 17.8m neither of those sound right considering the other guy got a 5m head and the only difference in his Q is he has a flow rate of 6litres instead of 5?

Edit: screwed it up, i now have a head of 4.1m
 
Last edited:
Solution

This one's easy...

Use the energy equation:

(p($1)/rho*g)+((v($1)^2)/2g)+z($1)=(p($2)/rho*g)+((v($2)^2)/2g)+z($2)+h($f)+sum(h($m))-h($p)

A $ sign within brackets mean that is a subscript.

h($f)+sum(h($m))=v^2((f*L/d)+sum(k))/2g

where sum(k) is the sum of all your minor loss coefficients due to bends, etc.

If you have the book Fluid Mechanics by Frank M. White (5th Ed), you can find an example on page 392. If you don't and need clarification, just ask.
 
Oh yeah, and h(p) is the losses due to a pump, if there is one in the system. Neglect if there is not.
 
that's the equation i ended up using and got a value of 4.1 meters which sounded about right to me
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K