Getting to this 4th order O.D.E.

  • Thread starter Thread starter hushish
  • Start date Start date
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 2K views
hushish
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
Hi,

Try as I might, I cannot understand how equation (3) with the k4 term was derived. In equation (2), w is a function of t. But in the k4 term after equation (3), there is a t2 term in the denominator. Should it not be a t1 only? What am I missing? Please help.

Regards,

Steve
 

Attachments

  • ODE query.PNG
    ODE query.PNG
    36.6 KB · Views: 536
Engineering news on Phys.org
The screenshot is not so clear. are these the equations?
##w = \sigma_x \frac{l}{R}=\frac{\sigma w t}{R} - \frac{Ety}{R^2} ##

and the substitution used is
##\frac{d^2y}{dx^2}=\frac{M}{D}##
##D=\frac{Et^2}{12(1-\mu^2)}##
##w=\frac{d^2M}{dx^2}=D\frac{d^4y}{dx^4}##

This leads indeed to a different answer with t instead of ##t^2##, but I do not know where the error is. It could be in the answer or in the substitution rule. You might need to check the second moment of area for your specific geometry to see if it is correct.
 
Hi,

I think the copy of the paper is unclear. I think there is a t3 term in D. Sorry for the confusion...

BUT, I could use your help with the final derivation of equation (4)-see attached. I know that the particular solution to the 4th order O.D.E should look something like this:
y(x) = k4(Rδ/E)x4/24
But, I don't see that in equation (4). What am I missing?

Regards,

Steve
 

Attachments

  • Deriving equation (4).PNG
    Deriving equation (4).PNG
    12.9 KB · Views: 612