Given a success rate of 1% and 100 tries....

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter llatosz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Probabilities Rate
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the probabilities of success and failure when attempting to achieve a 1% success rate over 100 trials. The probability of no successes is calculated as 0.99^100, resulting in approximately 36.6%. For one success, the probability is derived as P(1 win) = (0.01) * (0.99)^99 * 100, yielding about 36.97%. The calculations for two successes involve combinatorial analysis, leading to P(2 wins) = (0.01)^2 * (0.99)^98 * 4950, which results in approximately 18.49%. The discussion emphasizes the misconception that 100 attempts guarantee success, clarifying that the chances remain relatively low.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic probability concepts
  • Familiarity with binomial probability formulas
  • Knowledge of combinatorial mathematics
  • Ability to perform exponential calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study binomial probability distributions in detail
  • Learn about the law of large numbers and its implications
  • Explore advanced combinatorial techniques for probability calculations
  • Investigate real-world applications of probability in gaming and gambling
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, statisticians, game developers, and anyone interested in understanding probability in gaming contexts, particularly in relation to loot drop mechanics.

llatosz
Messages
62
Reaction score
9
What is the probability of no success? 1 success? 2 successes?

No success: 0.99^100 = 36.6% chance?

1 success: (0.99^99) + 0.01 = 37.97% chance? or (0.99^99) * (0.01)^1 = 0.369% chance ? You would think it would be fairly likely

2 successes: ? -Depends on formula for 1 success

Can someone show me how to calculate? This is to show a friend how you won't be guaranteed to get an item with a 1% drop rate if you buy 100 drops for a video game, but I want to explore it a bit further.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What would you say the chances of success on throw 1 and failure on every following throw?
And the chance of fail at throw 1, success at throw 2 and fail on the rest?
Etc.

You would think it would be fairly likely
WHY do you think that? There's a reason!
 
Last edited:
Merlin3189 said:
What would you say the chances of success on throw 1 and failure on every following throw?
And the chance of fail at throw 1, success at throw 2 and fail on the rest?
Etc.

Yes that is kinda what I'm asking lol. I'm aware that for 1 success there are 100 different combinations, and that for 2 successes there are like 998 or 999 combinations.

So the chance of success on throw 1 is 1%, and failure on every following throw is .99^99 = 36.97%, so the chance of 1 success would be 37.97% like I said?
Would this be the chance of 1 success out of 100?
 
You would think it would be fairly likely
You'd think that, because you have 100 chances of getting it, despite the low chance each time.

If you state it non-mathematically, I think it is easier:
What's the chance of winning on one particular throw? 0.01
What's the chance of winning on one particular throw and losing on the other 99 throws? 0.01 x 0.9999
Whats the chance of winning on ANY particular throw out of the 100 throws and losing on the other 99? 100 times previous answer.

P(1 success) is p1q(100-1) x (combinations: 1 from 100)
Which comes to 0.370 (3sf) or 0.3697 (4sf)

For 2 wins, you are going to say p2q(100-2)
and that is, say, P(WWLLLL...) , but it is also P(LLLWLLWLLL...) or P(WLLLLLLLLLWLLLL...) etc.
So you need to count how many ways you can get 2 wins out of 100 throws, 100C2 and add up all those probabilities.
Or more simply, just multiply P(2 specific wins) by 100C2
 
Merlin3189 said:
P(1 success) is p1q(100-1) x (combinations: 1 from 100)
Which comes to 0.370 (3sf) or 0.3697 (4sf)

For 2 wins, you are going to say p2q(100-2)
and that is, say, P(WWLLLL...) , but it is also P(LLLWLLWLLL...) or P(WLLLLLLLLLWLLLL...) etc.
So you need to count how many ways you can get 2 wins out of 100 throws, 100C2 and add up all those probabilities.
Or more simply, just multiply P(2 specific wins) by 100C2

Ah okay! Thanks! So p is probability of success and q is probability of fail from what I infer.
So, going forward "1 win" just means any 1 win, so,

P(1 win) = (0.01) * (0.99)99 * 100combos = 0.3697 = 36.97%
But then
P(2 wins) = (0.01)2 * (0.99)98 * (99*99)combos = 0.366 = 36.6% ... which doesn't make sense.

Also allow me to check my understanding if i may:
P(0 win) + P(1 win) + P(2 wins) + P(3 wins) ~=~ 0.95 to 1 because that covers nearly all possibilities since 4+ wins at 1% win rate should be incredibly rare
 
note the probability of zero successes is

##\binom{n}{0} (\frac{1}{n})^0 (1-\frac{1}{n})^n = (1-\frac{1}{n})^n \approx e^{-1}## for large n
 
llatosz said:
Ah okay! Thanks! So p is probability of success and q is probability of fail from what I infer.
Oops! Sorry that slipped through without my noticing. Yes. And q = 1-p
So, going forward "1 win" just means any 1 win, so,

P(1 win) = (0.01) * (0.99)99 * 100combos = 0.3697 = 36.97%
But then
P(2 wins) = (0.01)2 * (0.99)98 * (99*99)combos = 0.366 = 36.6% ... which doesn't make sense.

Also allow me to check my understanding if i may:
P(0 win) + P(1 win) + P(2 wins) + P(3 wins) ~=~ 0.95 to 1 because that covers nearly all possibilities since 4+ wins at 1% win rate should be incredibly rare
0.3660 + 0.3697 + 0.1849 = 0.9206 so, yes, there's not much chance left now
But your calculation for 2 combinations is not right.
P(2 specific wins) = 0.012 x 0.9998 is ok, but any 2 from 100 combinations is not 99 * 99
There are 100 positions for one win and 99 remaining positions for the other win, = 9900 permutations
But that counts every pair of wins twice - eg. WWLLL... or WWLLL... / WLLWLLL... or WLLWLLL... etc
So the number of combinations (when we ignore the order of selection) is 9900 / 2 = 4950
So P(exactly 2 wins in any positions) = 0.012 x 0.9998 x 4950 = 0.000037346 x 4950 = 0.1849

When you get on to 3 wins, there are 100 x 99 x 98 permutations, but each set of 3 wins gets counted 6 times (3 x 2 x 1)
and for 4 wins, there are 100 x 99 x 98 x 97 permutations, with each set of 4 wins getting counted 24 times (4 x 3 x 2 x 1 )

So the C(N,r) formula = ## \frac {N!} {(N-r)! \times r!}##
so, eg. ## C(100,4) = \frac {100!} { (100 - 4 )! \times 4!} = \frac {100!} {96! \times 4!} = \frac {100.99.98.97} {4.3.2.1} = 3,921,225 ##
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: llatosz
StoneTemplePython said:
note the probability of zero successes is

##\binom{n}{0} (\frac{1}{n})^0 (1-\frac{1}{n})^n = (1-\frac{1}{n})^n \approx e^{-1}## for large n

Oh wow, youre right, that's pretty neat!

Merlin3189 said:
There are 100 positions for one win and 99 remaining positions for the other win, = 9900 permutations
But that counts every pair of wins twice - eg. WWLLL... or WWLLL... / WLLWLLL... or WLLWLLL... etc
So the number of combinations (when we ignore the order of selection) is 9900 / 2 = 4950

Oh okay, this totally makes sense now!
And yes, I am getting the same result as you for 3 wins too! Makes sense, thank you! :D
Now I can formulate some numbers for my friend's loot drop gambling in a video game we play! There's an item he wants with a 1% drop rate and his idea was that he can buy 100 chances ($1 each) to guarantee himself the item lol.

Thank you very much for all your help, you are kind and it is fully appreciated :)
 
You're welcome.
So what is your conclusion, or your friend's? Does he think 100 tickets is enough to be certain of winning?
I was a little surprised when I worked out how many tickets I'd need, to have more chance of winning than not winning.
 
  • #10
With a 1% chance on each try, the chance of not winning on anyone try is 99%. The chance of not winning on either of 2 tries is 99% of 99%, or 0.99^2, which is 98.01%. For 100 tries, the chance of not winning at least once is 0.99^100, which is 0.366032, or 36.6032%. The chance of winning at least once is 100% minus the chance of not winning at least once, which for 100 tries with 1% chance of winning on each try, is 100% - 36.6032%, which is 63.3968%.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
6K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K