Given a uniform chain on an incline, find the work done by friction

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the work done by friction on a uniform chain of mass 'm' and length 'l' as it slides off a rough incline at an angle 'Q'. The chain's vertical part is 'n' times the total length, leading to the derived equation for work done by friction: Wf = mgl(1-n)(n-(1-n)SinQ)/2. The friction coefficient 'u' is expressed as u = [n-(1-n)SinQ]/(1-n)CosQ. The analysis utilizes Newton's second law and free body diagrams to establish the relationships between forces acting on the chain.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's second law
  • Familiarity with free body diagrams
  • Basic calculus for integration
  • Knowledge of friction coefficients and their application
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Newton's second law in dynamic systems
  • Learn about free body diagram techniques for complex systems
  • Explore integration techniques in physics problems
  • Research friction coefficients and their role in mechanical systems
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, mechanical engineers, and anyone involved in analyzing forces and motion in inclined systems will benefit from this discussion.

Kanda ryu
Messages
14
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


A uniform chain of mass 'm' and length 'l' rests on a rough incline (inclination is angle 'Q') with its part hanging vertically. The chain (inclined) starts moving up the incline (and the vertical part moving down) provided the hanging (vertical) part equals to 'n' times the total chain length. Find the work done by friction as it completely slides off the incline.

Homework Equations


Newton's 2nd law

The Attempt at a Solution


I assumed friction coefficient to be 'u'.
Frictional force would be N u.
I took the inclined part a system to draw the free body diagram.
N = m'gCosQ where m' is the mass of chain on the incline.
Work (fric) = N u s (displacement) x Cos 180° = - m'gCosQ x s
As mass m' will decrease as chain slides up the incline. I considered a small part of chain 'x' of mass dm. As chain is uniform density,
m/l = dm/x => dm = m x /l
For a small work dW
= -dm gCosQ dx
= - (m/l) gCosQ xdx
Let the length of vertically hanging part be 'a'
a/l = n => a=nl
So length of inclined part initially is l-nl
So I integrated xdx putting limits (l-ln) to 0 and got W= mlgCosQ u / 2 but the problem is I'm unable to find a way to write 'u' in terms of given variables.
I was hoping for an idea to find 'u' or any other better method to solve this (within the scope of basic calculus and mechanics).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Kanda ryu said:
small part of chain 'x'
That is an unusual choice and could lead to confusion. The standard approach would be to say the element is length dx and is at x from one end (which needs to be specified).
Kanda ryu said:
For a small work dW
The context is unclear. A small amount of work done on/by what and during what event? I guess you mean the work done by friction on the element as it moves its whole distance up the incline.
Kanda ryu said:
= -dm gCosQ dx
Two "d" terms looks very wrong. What is dx here?
Kanda ryu said:
Let the length of vertically hanging part be 'a'
When, at the start or at some point during the movement?
Kanda ryu said:
= - (m/l) gCosQ xdx
By some miracle, you have obtained the right expression. The element length dx has mass (m/l)dx and moves distance x up the incline.
Kanda ryu said:
putting limits (l-ln) to 0 and got W= mlgCosQ u / 2
Why does n not appear in your result?
Kanda ryu said:
I was hoping for an idea to find 'u'
You are given this for the initial state:
Kanda ryu said:
The chain (inclined) starts moving up the incline
It is not entirely clear, but I would take that to mean it started in near equilibrium.
 
PS.. I assume the question expects you to take the tip of the incline over which the chain slides as being frictionless. More reasonably, it would have the same coefficient as anywhere else. The tension in the chain as it runs around that point would lead to a significant normal force there and consequently a lot more friction. This becomes quite complicated because the friction will mean the tension is not uniform, and will anyway depend on the acceleration. This makes for a much more advanced problem.
 
There is a frictionless pulley at the tip of incline. The dimensions of the pulley is to be neglected.(view image)
haruspex said:
When, at the start or at some point during the movement?

At the start.

The equation I get is W(by friction) = (mlgCosQ(1-n)^2 u)/2
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20180325_192253.jpg
    IMG_20180325_192253.jpg
    7.9 KB · Views: 482
Kanda ryu said:
There is a frictionless pulley at the tip of incline. The dimensions of the pulley is to be neglected.(view image)At the start.

The equation I get is W(by friction) = (mlgCosQ(1-n)^2 u)/2
Ok, but now use the hint I gave you at the end of post #2 to find u.
 
So I take the initial part of chain on incline as a system and draw it's free body diagram. The exernal forceks are normal by surface, gravitational force, friction down the incline and tension up the incline by the other part of chain. But I am finding difficulty finding friction coefficient as it seems to be cancelling each other out in the equilibrium equations. Did I mess up taking the system or making the equations?
Here are my equations;
N=MgCosQ
NCosQ + TSinQ = fSinQ + Mg
NSinQ+fCosQ=TcosQ
f+MgSinQ=T
Where N and f are normal and frictional force exerted by rough surface on inclined part of chain initially and T is tension applied by the other part of chain. As you said, I assumed the system to be in near equilibrium initially so no acceleration.
 
Kanda ryu said:
N=MgCosQ
NCosQ + TSinQ = fSinQ + Mg
NSinQ+fCosQ=TcosQ
f+MgSinQ=T
Those four equations are all obtained by considering force balances on the sloping part of the chain. There are only two dimensions, so only two independent such equations are available. Whichever two you pick, the other two are redundant.
You need to relate the mass of that portion to the mass of the hanging portion (using n) and that to the tension. You also need to relate N to f using u.
 
haruspex said:
. Whichever two you pick, the other two are redundant.
Ok so I picked the the equation balancing the forces pulling it up and down the incline.
Hence f + m(1-n)gSinQ = T
So tension here would be equal to weight of the part hanging so T = mng
f=m(1-n)gCosQ u
So on substituting these values in the above equation, I got;
u= [n-(1-n)SinQ]/(1-n)CosQ
And on substituting this value to the Work by friction equation;
Wf= mgl(1-n)(n-(1-n)SinQ)/2
At n=1,Wf=0 (from this equation) which is to be expected as entire chain is hanging now. I hope this equation is correct and would be glad if you confirm it.
Thanks for the support
 
Kanda ryu said:
Ok so I picked the the equation balancing the forces pulling it up and down the incline.
Hence f + m(1-n)gSinQ = T
So tension here would be equal to weight of the part hanging so T = mng
f=m(1-n)gCosQ u
So on substituting these values in the above equation, I got;
u= [n-(1-n)SinQ]/(1-n)CosQ
And on substituting this value to the Work by friction equation;
Wf= mgl(1-n)(n-(1-n)SinQ)/2
At n=1,Wf=0 (from this equation) which is to be expected as entire chain is hanging now. I hope this equation is correct and would be glad if you confirm it.
Thanks for the support
Looks right.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K