Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around calculating the output level (q) that minimizes average variable cost and marginal cost based on a given average cost function. Participants explore the mathematical implications of the function, including the use of calculus and the quadratic formula, while addressing challenges in solving the equations involved.
Discussion Character
- Technical explanation
- Mathematical reasoning
- Debate/contested
Main Points Raised
- Post 1 introduces the average cost function and asks how to find the output level that minimizes average variable cost and marginal cost, expressing uncertainty about fixed costs.
- Post 2 suggests using differential calculus to find the minimum average cost by taking the derivative of the average cost function and setting it to zero.
- Post 3 simplifies the marginal cost equation and questions the application of the quadratic formula, indicating potential issues with the signs in the equation.
- Post 4 corrects a previous participant's sign error, noting that the roots of the equation have nonzero imaginary parts.
- Post 5 proposes a solution to the quadratic equation, suggesting roots of the form 4±4√6.
- Post 7 asks how to find the zeros of a cubic equation by hand or if graphing is necessary.
- Post 8 mentions that while there is a method to solve the cubic equation by hand, it is complex and suggests finding one root to simplify the process.
- Post 9 shares a numerical solution found using a graphing calculator, indicating one real root at approximately 8.66.
- Post 10 clarifies that the other roots of the cubic equation are complex, as the graph shows only one intersection with the x-axis.
- Post 11 reiterates the difficulty in finding zeros for the marginal cost equation.
- Post 12 reformulates the marginal cost equation and indicates that it also leads to imaginary roots.
- Post 13 shifts focus to the broader business context, suggesting that the minimum value of q is at the left endpoint of the interval of interest, concluding that the optimal solution might be to not engage in business at all.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants express differing views on the methods to solve the equations, with some agreeing on the use of calculus while others highlight issues with imaginary roots. There is no consensus on the final output level or the implications of the calculations.
Contextual Notes
Participants note limitations in their calculations, including potential sign errors and the complexity of solving cubic equations. The discussion also reflects uncertainty regarding the applicability of the quadratic formula in this context.