- #1
- 8,252
- 2,664
When did we humans start giving our animals names?
I have no idea.
I have no idea.
Giving Animals Names: When Did it Start?
- Thread starter Ivan Seeking
- Start date
Click For Summary
Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around the origins and historical context of naming animals, exploring whether names are given to domesticated pets, service animals, or even undomesticated creatures. Participants consider various aspects of animal naming, including cultural practices and the evolution of language.
Discussion Character
- Exploratory
- Debate/contested
- Conceptual clarification
Main Points Raised
- Some participants differentiate between categorical classification names (e.g., "cat," "cow") and individual names for companion animals (e.g., "Fido," "Fluffy").
- One participant suggests that naming might date back to ancient civilizations, such as the Egyptians, particularly for animals kept for service rather than consumption.
- Another viewpoint proposes that names could have been given to undomesticated animals, indicating a connection between language development and the practice of naming.
- There is a suggestion that naming might have started soon after language itself began, with the idea that civilization and writing correlate with naming pets.
- Some participants note that while animals raised for meat are often not named, there are exceptions where humorous names are given to livestock.
- A participant reflects on the historical context of animal identification in research, contrasting past informal naming practices with modern formal identification methods.
- Humorous commentary on the absurdity of naming children compared to animals is introduced, highlighting the cultural differences in naming conventions.
- References to literature and personal anecdotes about the emotional connections to named animals are shared, illustrating the complexity of human-animal relationships.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants express a range of views on the origins and practices of naming animals, with no clear consensus reached. The discussion includes competing ideas about when and why names are given, reflecting both cultural and personal perspectives.
Contextual Notes
Some limitations include the ambiguity surrounding the definitions of "service" versus "companion" animals and the lack of concrete historical evidence for naming practices. The discussion also touches on the emotional implications of naming animals in various contexts.
- #2
Math Is Hard
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
- 4,663
- 36
Do you mean categorical classification names like "cat" or "cow", or individual names for animals we keep around for service/companionship (e.g. "Fido" or "Fluffy")?
- #3
- 8,252
- 2,664
Hah! I can't believe I just edited your post. I haven't pulled that one in a long time.
Fluffy, Fido, my little princess, etc.
I don't think I have ever seen a reference to this. Maybe it goes all the way back to grunts and groans?
Fluffy, Fido, my little princess, etc.
I don't think I have ever seen a reference to this. Maybe it goes all the way back to grunts and groans?
Last edited:
- #4
Math Is Hard
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
- 4,663
- 36
I remember reading that the prophet Mohammed had a favorite cat named Muezza, but I would guess it goes at least as far back as the ancient Egyptian civilizations. I would think that if we could find some record of humans keeping animals for service rather than for consumption that might be a good indication of the beginnings, since we tend to not name animals that could end up on the dinner table. 
Last edited:
- #5
Huckleberry
- 497
- 7
We may have been giving names to animals before they were even domesticated. some examples of undomesticated animals that would need names are, that clever racoon that steals scraps of food from the camp when nobody is paying attention, the inquisitive lone wolf that follows the hunters, the spectacularly large and ferocious beast that threatens the community. It's easier to just say 'Bob' rather than 'the clever racoon that steals food from our camp' every time one refers to that individual animal. At what point did language and social development become sophisticated enough that we start giving children names? I would guess that is roughly the same time we started naming animals.
- #6
zoobyshoe
- 6,514
- 1,255
I don't know about service animals, but I'm sure that as soon as they began to be kept as pets, as such, they got named. The distinction between a service animal and a pet can often be a blurry one, though.Math Is Hard said:I remember reading that the prophet Mohammed had a favorite cat named Muezza, but I would guess it goes at least as far back as the ancient Egyptian civilizations. I would think that if we could find some record of humans keeping animals for service rather than for consumption that might be a good indication of the beginnings, since we tend to not name animals that could end up on the dinner table.
- #7
wolram
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
- 4,411
- 551
I would think giving milking animals names would be a good idea, it would be far easier to say daisy is the best milker than trying to describe the animal.
- #8
Jimmy Snyder
- 1,137
- 21
My guess is that it happened soon after language itself began. Here is a site that doesn't answer the question, but has some related information.
Dog Story
It seems that by the time we were civilized enough to write stuff down, we were naming our pets.
Dog Story
It seems that by the time we were civilized enough to write stuff down, we were naming our pets.
- #9
DaveC426913
Gold Member
2025 Award
- 24,490
- 8,763
As soon as there was more than one in a household?Ivan Seeking said:
- #10
Moonbear
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
- 11,959
- 54
Math Is Hard said:...since we tend to not name animals that could end up on the dinner table.
Actually, I know one person who does name his cattle that are raised for meat...but they get names like "Steak" and "Tasty" and "Sir Loin."
I've never heard someone do that before. But, as much as we caution people not to give names to the research flock to avoid getting too attached, I've noticed that their numbers get used just as if it were a name by some of the students: "Oh doesn't 123 have the cutest little fuzzy face?." 
Though, I always find it amusing to dig through old literature in animal sciences. As much as the older papers used to have much more formal language (entirely in the third person passive voice, avoidance of pronouns..."the cow" instead of "she"), you'll find that the animal identifications are NOT as formalized. Nowadays, every animal gets an ID number upon arrival, and that number is logged, along with any previous ID numbers it came in with, and all this is tracked so you have some history of where an animal has come from and what its final disposition is. Back then, you'd get papers where they'd refer to the research animals as "Daisy," and "Muffin." But, I do wonder if the use of names for animals was first to identify individuals in a flock to keep track of the flock and their production, or if it originated with animals being kept more as companion animals.
- #11
Danger
Gold Member
- 9,805
- 251
Huckleberry said:
You name your children?! Why can't you just tatoo numbers in their ears like the rest of us?
- #12
Jimmy Snyder
- 1,137
- 21
This reminds me of a book that my parents had called Don't Get Perconal with a Chicken. The title refers to a letter written by a child, admonishing people not to form personal relationships with farm animals that they may someday have to eat.Math Is Hard said:
- #13
Danger
Gold Member
- 9,805
- 251
I had a couple of pet pigs when I was a kid. Somehow, their demise didn't adversely affect my love of bacon.