Global U(1) invariant of Dirac Lagrangian

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The global U(1) invariance of the Dirac Lagrangian corresponds to different conserved quantities depending on the specific Lagrangian in use. For charged particles, this typically represents charge conservation, while for uncharged particles like neutrinos, it corresponds to neutrino number conservation. The hermiticity of the Hamiltonian can break this symmetry, particularly in cases where the Lagrangian does not support U(1) symmetry, such as when dealing with real scalar fields. In the context of the Standard Model, the relevant invariants include lepton number and baryon number, each associated with separate U(1) symmetries.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Dirac Lagrangian and its formulation
  • Knowledge of U(1) symmetry in quantum field theory
  • Familiarity with the concept of hermitian operators in quantum mechanics
  • Basic principles of particle physics, including lepton and baryon numbers
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of U(1) symmetry in quantum field theories
  • Explore the role of hermitian operators in quantum mechanics
  • Investigate the differences between Dirac and Majorana mass terms
  • Review Srednicki's text on quantum field theory for deeper insights
USEFUL FOR

Particle physicists, theoretical physicists, and students studying quantum field theory who are interested in the implications of symmetries in Lagrangian formulations.

metroplex021
Messages
148
Reaction score
0
Does anybody know what interpretation the invariant corresponding to the global U(1) invariance of the Dirac Lagrangian is? I have always had it in my head that it's charge, but then I realized that uncharged free particles such as neutrinos satisfy this equation too! Any thoughts much appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Depends on the specifics of your lagrangian. Think lepton number, baryon number, B-L, etc.
 
Requiring the Hamiltonian to be hermitian can break this symmetry. Uncharged particles usually have a Lagrangian that looks something like \mathcal{L} = \frac{1}{2}\partial_u\phi\partial^u\phi - \frac{1}{2}\mu^2\phi^2. In that case, the hermiticity of H forces \phi to be real, so there is no U(1) symmetry anymore. Was that what you meant, or did you have a specific Lagrangian in mind?
 
Last edited:
Well, I just had in mind the Dirac lagrangian. It seems that neutrinos have mass, and if so should presumably obey this equation. But if so, what does the U(1) symmetry correspond to, given that these guys aren't charged? Thanks for your replies!
 
If you just have neutrinos, it would be neutrino number. If you have something like a standard model lagrangian, it would be lepton number and baryon number (two separate U(1)s)
 
Massive neutrinos with a "Majorana mass" are not described by the Dirac lagrangian. See e.g. Srednicki's text for details.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
947
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
9K