GM Counter Not Useful for Measuring Gas Absorbed Energy

  • Level: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Mason Smith
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Tube
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
3 replies · 2K views
Mason Smith
Messages
21
Reaction score
2
Why is a GM counter not useful for determining the absorbed energy in a gas?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To put it another way the event is an all or nothing processes. The ionizing radiation ( charged particles or photon) produces ion pairs in the tube.The high voltage between the anode and cathode accelerated the electrons in the gas of the tube which in tern causes more ionization which can initiate an "avalanche" of ions creating pulse of charge at the anode. GM counter do not discriminate between type of radiation. A pulse is created every time enough ion pairs are left behind in the tube.

If the tube voltage is reduce enough you get a range of voltages where you can get a pulse created that is proportional to the energy deposited in the gas. This is the basis of the proportional counter. Reducing the tube voltage further the the output of the chamber again becomes independent of the energy for the most part. This then becomes and ionization chamber.

Each of the three types of detectors above are basically the same with a conducting cylinder enclosing a wire on the axis with a positive voltage on the wire. However the actual construction, size, and gas used varies with the chambers and use.
 
Mason Smith said:
Why is a GM counter not useful for determining the absorbed energy in a gas?

Why should it? What exactly is in the mechanism of a Geiger tube that makes you think that it can measure the "... absorbed energy in a gas.. "?

Zz.