God's Pre-Determined Miracles: Universe Laws & Rules

  • Thread starter Thread starter bassplayer142
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of miracles and their relationship with the laws of nature and the existence of God. It begins by questioning whether miracles must occur in real time or if the laws governing the universe can be considered divine miracles established by God prior to creation. The conversation highlights that miracles are typically defined as violations of natural law, and while some argue that everything can be seen as a miracle if God is presumed to exist, this definition is not universally accepted. The dialogue explores the implications of miracles on scientific inquiry and induction, suggesting that what some perceive as miracles may simply be phenomena not yet understood. The distinction is made between supernatural interventions and natural occurrences, with examples like the parting of the Red Sea illustrating traditional views of miracles. Ultimately, the discussion acknowledges that while some view extraordinary events as miracles, others see them as natural phenomena that require further explanation rather than divine intervention.
bassplayer142
Messages
431
Reaction score
0
When you think of a miracle you think of something amazing happening that cannot be explained. Until science was discovered everything was a miracle because the sun rising and the stars in the sky were not explained. But why would a miracle have to happen in real time. Isn't it safe to say that the laws and properties that govern the universe are indeed gods miracles? That when something amazing happens we see that god isn't making them happen in real time , but he made them happen with his laws and rules set before the universe was made.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The laws of physics needs no creator. We know why the laws of physics are the way they are (most of the time). The laws of physics are not laws like legislative laws, but general descriptions of the way the universe works. These come from symmetries which can be roughly said to be geometrical phenomena.

A good book is "The Comprehensible Universe: Where Do the Laws of Physics Come From?" by Victor Stenger.

A miracle is generally defined as a violation of natural law. Although we can rewrite the law to include that exception, but that would be somewhat arbitrary. Also ponder what effect the possibilities of miracles has on the usage of induction by science in its quest for knowledge of the natural world.
 
Last edited:
Assuming that God exists (I wonder why you don't capitalize "God"), and you define "miracle" to be something done by God, as you seem to be doing, then, yes, everything is a "miracle". However, that is not the usual definition of "miracle" and, as for God, to quote Laplace, when Napoleon asked why there was no mention of God in his treatise on the solar system, "I had no need of that hypothesis."
 
bassplayer142 said:
. But why would a miracle have to happen in real time. Isn't it safe to say that the laws and properties that govern the universe are indeed gods miracles?
Why would it be safe to say that?

You
i) PRESUME the existence of God,
ii) and then say that hypothezised existence caused observed laws,
iii) declaring this as a miracle.

Any and all of your statements might be contested.
 
Basically I'm saying that when people point out anything that is a miracle, that they may just be pointing out something they don't understand completely.
 
bassplayer142 said:
Basically I'm saying that when people point out anything that is a miracle, that they may just be pointing out something they don't understand completely.

This is more a theology question than one of philosophy.

What I mean is, miracles aren't just about the unexplained. Defining a miracle is basically talking about intervention by a supernatural entity...gods. In other words, if not for the god, things would have 'naturally' gone a different way.

The Jewish god, for instance, parted the red sea for Moses. It wasn't that Moses didn't understand tides, he knew what happened. God intervened, changed the rules, on his behalf. By definition, no natural phenomena explains what happened, because by definition, the laws of nature were suspended by the intervention of a god.
 
bassplayer142 said:
Basically I'm saying that when people point out anything that is a miracle, that they may just be pointing out something they don't understand completely.
No, that was not what you basically said.
What you said was:

bassplayer142 said:
Isn't it safe to say that the laws and properties that govern the universe are indeed gods miracles?
 
this goes back to 'first cause.'
1) assume that all actions have a reaction
2) the reaction becomes an action
3) you can follow all reactions to a first action

what was the cause of the first action

even in mathematics you can't mathematically prove A+B=C. its just through all of history if you took 2 things and put it with one thing you get 3 things.

in that sense i could see a person believing in god for the basic rules of math and physics.

however a miracle is often described as something happing ageist the laws of nature.
 
bassplayer142 said:
When you think of a miracle you think of something amazing happening that cannot be explained.
Maybe that's what you consider a "miracle". To others, the birth of a child is a miracle or maybe a paraplegic walking again. I personally do not believe in "godly" miracles. There are several things that happen that can not be simple explained, this does not make them a "miracle". Although, if you can show me a one.. I'd take a look.

bassplayer142 said:
...when people point out anything that is a miracle, that they may just be pointing out something they don't understand completely...
.. then Quantum Field Theory is a miracle to me !:smile:
 
Last edited:
Back
Top