Google uncensors its search engine in China

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around Google's decision to stop censoring its search results in China, specifically regarding sensitive topics like the Tiananmen Square Massacre. Participants explore the implications of this decision, the motivations behind it, and the potential impact on Google's market share and reputation.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express excitement about the ability to search for previously censored topics, such as the Tiananmen Square Massacre.
  • Others suggest that Google's decision may be driven by market pressures and the need to maintain a positive image in the West.
  • There are claims that Google's market share in China is small compared to local competitors like Baidu, which may influence its decision to uncensor.
  • Some participants argue that Google's censorship practices in other areas, such as gambling and adult content, indicate a willingness to comply with regulatory pressures.
  • Concerns are raised about the potential backlash from users and advertisers regarding Google's previous censorship in China.
  • A few participants question whether significant numbers of users or advertisers have actually stopped using Google due to its censorship policies.
  • Speculation arises about Google's future strategies, including the possibility of launching satellite internet services.
  • Some participants note the irony of being able to bypass censorship through proxies even when Google was censoring its results.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a mix of opinions, with no clear consensus on the motivations behind Google's decision or its potential consequences. Some support Google's move as a positive change, while others remain skeptical about its impact on market share and user trust.

Contextual Notes

Participants discuss various assumptions about market dynamics, user behavior, and the implications of censorship without resolving these complexities. The discussion reflects differing perspectives on the balance between business interests and ethical considerations.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those following developments in internet censorship, corporate ethics, and the dynamics of global tech markets.

waht
Messages
1,502
Reaction score
4
You can now search for Tienanmen Square Massacre in China. Wonder how long it will last.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/8581393.stm

Google has stopped censoring its search results in China, ignoring warnings by the country's authorities.

The US company said its Chinese users would be redirected to the uncensored pages of its Hong Kong website.
In January, Google had complained about a "sophisticated cyber attack originating from China".

Nice comeback. I love google.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That's a good idea. I went to google.cn just to look up the massacre so I can tell my grandchildren I was there when you could do that
 
I searched a bunch of phrases that included the words "china" and "sucks"

Just because I can.
 
NeoDevin said:
Here's Google's comments on the matter:
Google is a business. At some point the bad press in the US and Europe from censoring China will result in decreased market share and ad revenue.
It's market share in China is small compared to the native competitor Baidu, and presumably it's ad revenue from marketing to the average Chinese is even smaller. It may do better with affluent middle class Chinese by not being aligned with the government.

As long as $sales_loss_west > $sales_gain_china they will stop censoring.

If the US clamped down on say, advertising online gambling, Google would be just as quick to implement censorship there.
 
mgb_phys said:
If the US clamped down on say, advertising online gambling, Google would be just as quick to implement censorship there.

Google already does. It has a good list of sites it will not do business with.

Sites with Google ads may not include or link to:

Pornography, adult or mature content
Violent content
Content related to racial intolerance or advocacy against any individual, group or organisation
Excessive profanity
Hacking/cracking content
Gambling or casino-related content
Illicit drugs and drug paraphernalia content
Sales of beer or hard alcohol
Sales of tobacco or tobacco-related products
Sales of prescription drugs
Sales of weapons or ammunition (e.g. firearms, firearm components, fighting knives, stun guns)
Sales of products that are replicas or imitations of designer goods
Sales or distribution of coursework or student essays
Content regarding programs which compensate users for clicking ads or offers, performing searches, surfing websites or reading emails
Any other content that is illegal, promotes illegal activity or infringes on the legal rights of others

https://www.google.com/adsense/support/bin/answer.py?answer=48182&gsessionid=kSyOZe0tkEYJax1Hcx8mLw
 
Do you know anyone who actually stopped using Google because they were censoring in China? I don't.

Have you ever heard of an advertiser saying that they wouldn't advertise with Google because of the censorship in China? I haven't.

I'm not saying that neither of these has happened, but I don't really think it's a significant market share that Google has lost because of it.
 
spacemanspiff said:
Google already does. It has a good list of sites it will not do business with.

https://www.google.com/adsense/support/bin/answer.py?answer=48182&gsessionid=kSyOZe0tkEYJax1Hcx8mLw

There you go: When faced with the decision between short term profit, and what they consider the "high road", they chose the high road. Not saying that I agree with their decision to refuse to advertise all of these sites, but I do believe they are honestly trying to uphold their motto "Don't be Evil".
 
  • #10
NeoDevin said:
I'm not saying that neither of these has happened, but I don't really think it's a significant market share that Google has lost because of it.
No but it's pre-emptive, it doesn't take long for a Starbucks to go from being everybody's favorite to being regarded as just another McDonalds
The main problem is with governments, Google's next big market is to tie up the business of government data - with Google healthcare etc. Certainly in Europe it's difficult to sell the idea of trusting voter's health records to someone who works closely with the Chinese secret police.

ps. Google don't run adwords for those sites - but they also don't block them from search results. If you couldn't search for mp3s or porn on Google people would soon switch to a competitor.
 
  • #11
You can search for other things on google besides porn and torrents?
 
  • #12
Google already does. It has a good list of sites it will not do business with.

Sites with Google ads may not include or link to:

This just for advertising with google. That doesn't mean that google itself won't index sites on weapons, sex, alcohol, etc, except extremist terrorist sites. A company that wants to advertise their products with google are not allowed to put ads with certain content, that's all. But they still can have their website indexed by google.
 
  • #13
The next obvious move for Google is to launch their own satellites and provide free satellite internet access for everyone in the world.
 
  • #14
MotoH said:
I searched a bunch of phrases that included the words "china" and "sucks"

Just because I can.

Ironically, while the old google.cn blocked "tianammen square" and youtube, it was no problem finding a proxy bouncer that would get u through the "great firewall."
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
7K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 75 ·
3
Replies
75
Views
8K
Replies
6
Views
5K
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
7K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
12K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K