Grad School Skills: Programming & Research Experience

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the skills and experiences that are beneficial for graduate school applications, particularly focusing on programming and research experience. Participants explore the importance of presenting these skills effectively within the context of personal narratives and specific research contexts.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that applications should reflect personal experiences rather than simply listing skills like programming languages or leadership roles.
  • Another participant argues that specific technical skills, particularly in experimental fields, are often sought after by professors and can significantly enhance an applicant's profile.
  • A later reply emphasizes the importance of integrating skills into meaningful experiences rather than presenting them as a mere list, advocating for contextual examples of expertise.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the presentation of skills in applications. While some emphasize the narrative aspect, others highlight the necessity of specific technical skills, indicating that the discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

There is a lack of consensus on how best to present skills in applications, with varying opinions on the balance between narrative and technical specificity. The discussion also reflects differing expectations from application committees based on field-specific needs.

cmyers152
Messages
19
Reaction score
4
I'm looking to compile a list of skills that people have used on their grad school applications that looked good, such as programming and research experience
 
Physics news on Phys.org
cmyers152 said:
I'm looking to compile a list of skills that people have used on their grad school applications that looked good, such as programming and research experience
I don't want to get all preachy, especially now that you seem all fired up, but your applications have to be organic, reflecting your own personal experience. There is no place in the application paperwork where a list would be suitable, not even on the resume. The committees don't care whether you have deep experience in JAVA, Excel, python, running a 4H club, or even president of your physics society. The only thing that looks good is a compelling story backed by a competent performance. Focus on your grades and research and the story tells itself.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: cmyers152
DrSteve said:
I don't want to get all preachy, especially now that you seem all fired up, but your applications have to be organic, reflecting your own personal experience. There is no place in the application paperwork where a list would be suitable, not even on the resume. The committees don't care whether you have deep experience in JAVA, Excel, python, running a 4H club, or even president of your physics society. The only thing that looks good is a compelling story backed by a competent performance. Focus on your grades and research and the story tells itself.

I'm going to respectfully disagree here. A lot of experimentalists are looking for very specific skills, especially if they've had a run of new grad students without them: programming, electronics, high vacuum, etc. Of course, these skills are best framed in the context of prior research experience, and kind words from undergrad research mentors and co-authoring papers is even better. Often, a specific offer of a research assistantship from an experimentalist with some clout will get you admission to the program, and some experimentalists NEED grad students in their groups who can be productive quickly.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: cmyers152
I'm going to respectfully disagree with myself or, at least, clarify. Professors are indeed looking for special skill sets, which, if possessed, will help the applicant distinguish him/herself from the crowd. What you want to avoid is the laundry list approach, where the skill is not integrated with a meaningful activity. So, instead of a resume that looks like this...

"Expertise includes
  • C++
  • ROOT
  • GEANT
  • RF techniques"
...I would strongly suggest that a sentence or so be devoted to particular instances where each expertise was demonstrated. For example, I developed a GEANT model that recorded coincident gamma, beta emissions from 136Xe in dodecahedron PMT array for radioxenon monitoring purposes.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Dr. Courtney

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K