Grand Canonical Partition Function and Adsorption Statistics

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the grand canonical partition function \(\mathcal{Z_1}(T, \mu)\) for a single adsorption position on a two-dimensional surface in thermal equilibrium with a gas. The correct formulation is \(\mathcal{Z_1} = e^0 + e^{\beta(\mu - \epsilon)}\), accounting for both the empty site and the site occupied by one particle. For the entire surface, the grand canonical partition function \(\mathcal{Z_M}(T, \mu)\) is derived from the summation over all allowed values of particle number \(N\). The probability \(P(T, \mu)\) that one adsorption position is taken is given by \(P = \frac{e^{\beta(\mu - \epsilon)}}{\mathcal{Z_1}}\).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of grand canonical ensemble concepts
  • Familiarity with partition functions in statistical mechanics
  • Knowledge of thermodynamic variables such as temperature \(T\) and chemical potential \(\mu\)
  • Basic proficiency in mathematical summation and exponential functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the grand canonical partition function in statistical mechanics
  • Learn about the implications of the chemical potential \(\mu\) in adsorption processes
  • Explore the relationship between temperature \(T\) and adsorption probability in thermodynamic systems
  • Investigate the role of dimensionality in adsorption phenomena on surfaces
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in statistical mechanics, physicists studying adsorption phenomena, and anyone interested in the thermodynamic properties of surfaces in equilibrium with gases.

Arjani
Messages
20
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Consider a two dimensional surface on a three dimensional crystal. This surface has M positions that can adsorb particles, each of which can bind one particle only and an adsorption does not affect the adsorption on nearby sites. An adsorbed particle has energy ε and an empty site has energy 0.

(Question A and B come here, but I could answer those.)

The surface is now considered to be in diffusive and thermal equilibrium with a gas of temperature T and chemical potential μ, so the energy E and the number of adsorbed particles can now vary.

c) Calculate the grand canonical partitition function \mathcal{Z_1} (T, \mu) of one adsorption position and then the grand canonical partition function for the entire surface \mathcal{Z_M} (T, \mu).

d) Calculate the chance P(T,\mu) that one adsorption position is taken.

Homework Equations



\mathcal{Z} = \sum e^{\beta(\mu N_i - E_i)}

The Attempt at a Solution



So for \mathcal{Z_1} (T, \mu), N = 1 and E_i = 0 or E_i = \epsilon and so

\mathcal{Z_1} = \sum e^{\beta(\mu - E_i)} = e^{\beta(\mu - \epsilon)} + e^{\beta(\mu - 0)} = e^{\beta \mu}(e^{-\beta \epsilon} + 1)

This is my solution. However, I read that you have to take N = 0 for E_i = 0 and N = 1 for E_i = \epsilon, resulting in \mathcal{Z_1} = e^0 + e^{\beta(\mu - \epsilon)}, so I'm confused. What is correct here?

As for \mathcal{Z_M}, I'm not sure how to go about that. Can you do something like this?

\mathcal{Z_M} = \sum_{i=0}^{M} e^{\beta N_i} \sum_{i=0}^{\epsilon} e^{- \beta E_i}

d) This is simply P = \frac{e^{\beta(\mu - \epsilon)}}{\mathcal{Z_1}}?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Arjani said:

Homework Equations



\mathcal{Z} = \sum e^{\beta(\mu N_i - E_i)}

Think about what the summation index is here.

The Attempt at a Solution



So for \mathcal{Z_1} (T, \mu), N = 1 and E_i = 0 or E_i = \epsilon and so

\mathcal{Z_1} = \sum e^{\beta(\mu - E_i)} = e^{\beta(\mu - \epsilon)} + e^{\beta(\mu - 0)} = e^{\beta \mu}(e^{-\beta \epsilon} + 1)

This is my solution. However, I read that you have to take N = 0 for E_i = 0 and N = 1 for E_i = \epsilon, resulting in \mathcal{Z_1} = e^0 + e^{\beta(\mu - \epsilon)}, so I'm confused. What is correct here?

The summation is over all allowed values of ##N##, namely ##N = 0## for no particle absorbed at the site and ##N = 1## for one particle absorbed at the site. You didn't quite handle the ##N_i=0## case correctly in the expression \mathcal{Z} = \sum e^{\beta(\mu N_i - E_i)}. You should get the result that you stated from your reading.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K