How Does Coulomb Repulsion Affect a Fermionic Two-Level System?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Selveste
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    System
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the analysis of a fermionic two-level system influenced by Coulomb repulsion. The Hamiltonian is defined as H = ∑(ε_i n_i) + ∑(U n_i n_j), where U > 0 represents the Coulomb interaction when both states are occupied. The grand canonical partition function Z_g is computed through direct summation, leading to the expression Z_g = (1 + e^{-\beta(ε_1 - μ)})(1 + e^{-\beta(ε_2 - μ)}). The average particle number is derived using = ∂ln Z_g/∂(βμ), resulting in a formula that incorporates the chemical potential μ and energy levels ε. The discussion emphasizes the need to account for the Coulomb interaction when calculating Z_g.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of fermionic systems and their energy states
  • Familiarity with grand canonical ensemble concepts
  • Knowledge of partition functions in statistical mechanics
  • Basic grasp of Coulomb interactions in quantum systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the derivation of the grand canonical partition function for interacting particles
  • Study the implications of Coulomb repulsion in many-body quantum systems
  • Investigate the behavior of fermionic systems under varying chemical potentials
  • Learn about the statistical mechanics of non-interacting versus interacting particles
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, researchers in quantum mechanics, and students studying statistical mechanics, particularly those interested in fermionic systems and Coulomb interactions.

Selveste
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
a
Relevant Equations
a
Problem statement:

Consider a fermionic system with two states 1,2 with energy levels \epsilon_i, i=1,2. Moreover, the number of particles in state i is n_i = 0,1. Let the Hamiltonian of the system be
H = \sum_{i=1}^2 \epsilon_i n_i + \sum_{i \neq j} U n_i n_j
Here, U > 0 is a Coulomb-repulsion present in the system if both states i and j are occupied.

a) Compute the grand canonical partition function Z_g of the system by direct summation.
b) Let \epsilon_i = \epsilon; (i=1,2), and compute <N>.
c) Let \beta U \gg 1 and find <U> in this limit. Finally, for \beta U \gg 1, set \mu = \epsilon and compute <U> in this case.

Attempt at solution:

Just to make it clear:
n_k is the number of particles in the state with wave number k.
\mu is the chemical potential - the energy required to remove one particle from the system.

a)
Z_g = \sum_{[n_k]} e^{-\beta \sum_{k}(\epsilon_k-\mu)n_k} = \prod_k \sum_{n_k}e^{-\beta (\epsilon_k-\mu)n_k} = \prod_k \sum_{n_k=0}^{1}e^{-\beta (\epsilon_k-\mu)n_k}
=\prod_k \Big( 1 + e^{-\beta(\epsilon_k-\mu)}\Big) = \Big(1+e^{-\beta (\epsilon_1 -\mu)}\Big)\Big( 1+e^{-\beta (\epsilon_2 -\mu)} \Big)
= 1 + e^{-\beta (\epsilon_1 - \mu)} + e^{-\beta (\epsilon_2 - \mu)} + e^{-\beta (\epsilon_1 + \epsilon_2 - 2\mu)}

b)
<N> = \frac{\partial ln Z_g}{\partial (\beta \mu)} = \frac{2e^{-\beta (\epsilon - \mu)}+2e^{-2\beta(\epsilon - \mu)}}{1 +2e^{-\beta(\epsilon - \mu)}+e^{-2\beta(\epsilon - \mu)}}

c)
Here I don't know what to do as there is no U is the expressions I have found.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Selveste said:
Z_g = \sum_{[n_k]} e^{-\beta \sum_{k}(\epsilon_k-\mu)n_k} = \prod_k \sum_{n_k}e^{-\beta (\epsilon_k-\mu)n_k} = \prod_k \sum_{n_k=0}^{1}e^{-\beta (\epsilon_k-\mu)n_k}
It looks like you are writing ##Z_g## for a system of non-interacting particles, which is not the case for this system where you have the "Coulomb interaction energy" ##U##.A basic way to express ##Z_g## is as a sum over all possible microstates, ##s##, $$Z_g = \sum_s e^{-\beta (E_s - \mu N_s)}$$ where ##E_s## is the total energy of the system for the microstate ##s## and ##N_s## is the total number of particles in the microstate ##s##. The sum over all microstates includes states for all possible values of the total number of particles.

In your problem, it is easy to explicitly enumerate all the possible microstates. There are only a few. So, you should list all the possible microstates and for each microstate, ##s##, specify the value of ##E_s## and ##N_s##. Then you can easily write out the above expression for ##Z_g##.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Selveste

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K