Granulometric Analysis: Radionuclide Activity, Uranium, Thorium & Potassium

  • Thread starter Thread starter hariprasath
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Analysis
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between particle size and the activity of radionuclides, specifically uranium, thorium, and potassium. Participants explore how particle size may influence the content and distribution of these primordial radionuclides in sediments, as well as the implications for economic geology.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question the necessity of determining particle size when estimating radionuclide activity, suggesting a potential relationship between particle size (sand, silt, clay) and the presence of primordial radionuclides.
  • One participant notes that particle size and composition are significant for shielding alpha and beta activity, particularly emphasizing alpha radiation.
  • There is a suggestion that the economic motivation for identifying deposits with high concentrations of uranium or thorium is linked to the particle size and composition of ores.
  • Another participant inquires about the relationship between minerals such as zinc, copper, manganese, and iron found in sediments and radionuclides like uranium, thorium, and potassium.
  • A response indicates that there is no specific relationship between these minerals and radionuclides, but rather that it is dependent on geological or geographical factors.
  • Examples are provided, such as the Ningyo-Toge uranium deposit in Japan, which illustrates the complex interactions between uranium and other minerals during geological processes.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying views on the relationship between particle size and radionuclide activity, with some suggesting a connection while others argue that it is context-dependent. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the specific interactions between minerals and radionuclides.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference geological examples and literature to support their points, indicating that the relationships discussed may depend on specific conditions and contexts that are not universally applicable.

hariprasath
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
why do we need to determine the particle size while estimating the activity of radionuclides?
is there any relation between the particle size (sand, silt and clay) and primordial radionuclide?
will the content of uranium, thorium and potassium rely on particle sizes?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
hariprasath said:
why do we need to determine the particle size while estimating the activity of radionuclides?
is there any relation between the particle size (sand, silt and clay) and primordial radionuclide?
will the content of uranium, thorium and potassium rely on particle sizes?
Is one referring to ores? Particle size and composition are important with respect to shielding of alpha and beta activity, and alpha more so than beta. The composition, i.e., the proportion that is U or Th in the mineral is also important with respect to obtaining a correct assay. U and Th ores represent a variety of compositions with varying levels of U or Th compounds.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uranium_ore

With respect to economics, one wishes to identify deposits that have the highest concentration of U or Th. This is also the motivation for any of the economically important elements, e.g., Au, Ag, REE, Pt, Rh, Co, Fe, Cr, Ni, Zr, . . . . .
 
thanks for the reply,
do there exists any relation between the minerals (Zn, Cu, Mn, Fe) that is found in the sediments with that of radionuclides (U, Th, K)?
 
hariprasath said:
thanks for the reply,
do there exists any relation between the minerals (Zn, Cu, Mn, Fe) that is found in the sediments with that of radionuclides (U, Th, K)?
There does not appear to be a specific or unique relationship, but rather, it is geologically or geographically dependent. For example, vanadium occurs in about 152 minerals, which could include various iron ores, but it is also a byproduct of certain uranium ores.

There is an example of uranium with Fe and Mn minerals, "The Ningyo-Toge uranium deposit is one of the typical sedimentary uranium deposits in Japan. In general, during weathering, U is removed from the basal granite through underground water. The underground water in this area is rich in U, and has a comparatively high concentration of Fe and Mn." http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0009254187901367

See page 275 in http://www.minsocam.org/msa/OpenAccess_publications/Craig_Vaughan/Craig_Vaughan_Chptr_10.pdf
The text discusses URANIUM-VANADIUM-COPPER ORES ASSOCIATED WITH SANDSTONES AND UNCONFORMITY-TYPE URANIUM DEPOSITS

One can also research Monazite and its distribution.
 
thank you for the answer sir, the link i went through is also useful in clarifying the doubts.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
11K