Graph Sin(2x+6): Is Parent Function the Best Option?

  • Thread starter Thread starter barryj
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Graphing
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around graphing the function sin(2x+6) and the methods for interpreting its transformations. Participants explore the implications of starting with the parent function sin(x) and applying transformations such as horizontal compression and translations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss different methods for graphing sin(2x+6), including converting the expression for clarity on period and phase shift. There is a debate on whether starting from the parent function is more effective than directly interpreting the transformed function.

Discussion Status

Some participants suggest that the approach of decomposing the function into its transformations is valid, while others express confusion over the phase shift calculation used in their schooling. There is an acknowledgment of differing educational approaches without a clear consensus on the best method.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the phase shift calculation may not be immediately obvious when starting with the expression 2x + 6, leading to discussions about teaching methods and the clarity of transformations in various educational contexts.

barryj
Messages
856
Reaction score
51
Homework Statement
Graph sin(2x+6)
Relevant Equations
period = 2pi/2, phase shift = 6/2
My question is when I start to graph sin (2x+6) I convert the expression to sin 2(x+3).
My thinking that by doing so I can easily see the period is 2pi/2 and there is a horizontal translation of 3. Some books state that starting with sin(2x+6) the period is 2pi/2 , the same as above, and that there is a phase shift of 6/2. I think it is better to start with a parent function of sin x, then apply horizontal compression and/or shift translations to get the correct graph.

Similarly for an absolute expression |2x-8| I always convert the expression to |2(x-4)| and apply translations.

Comments please?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You should do whatever makes sense to you.

Edit to add: Assuming it's also correct :)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: SammyS and topsquark
barryj said:
Homework Statement:: Graph sin(2x+6)
Relevant Equations:: period = 2pi/2, phase shift = 6/2

My question is when I start to graph sin (2x+6) I convert the expression to sin 2(x+3).
My thinking that by doing so I can easily see the period is 2pi/2 and there is a horizontal translation of 3. Some books state that starting with sin(2x+6) the period is 2pi/2 , the same as above, and that there is a phase shift of 6/2. I think it is better to start with a parent function of sin x, then apply horizontal compression and/or shift translations to get the correct graph.

Similarly for an absolute expression |2x-8| I always convert the expression to |2(x-4)| and apply translations.

Comments please?
Your strategy is the correct one. Look at compressions/expansions first, then reflections, and finally translations.
Starting from ##y = \sin(x)##, the graph of ##y = \sin(2x)## is a compression by a factor of 2 toward the y-axis. Then ##y = \sin(2(x + 3))## is a translation of the compressed function by 3 units to the left. Similar idea for your absolute value function.

If you decompose your given function in the wrong order, you can sometimes wind up with the wrong result, so it's a good idea to check with a couple of points to make sure you've done things correctly.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: WWGD
At the high school here they are taught to calculate a phase shift of, in this example 6/2. Ultimately it is the same thing but when starting with 2x+6 the translation is not obvious. I guess our school is teaching "new math".
 
barryj said:
At the high school here they are taught to calculate a phase shift of, in this example 6/2. Ultimately it is the same thing but when starting with 2x+6 the translation is not obvious. I guess our school is teaching "new math".
No, not "new math." To get the phase shift of 6/2, they are implicitly decomposing 2x + 6 into 2(x + 6/2) (I guess).
 
I was just kidding about the "new math". I guess I do not understand why they use the phase shift calculation rather than merely use what they already know about transformations.
 
barryj said:
At the high school here they are taught to calculate a phase shift of, in this example 6/2. Ultimately it is the same thing but when starting with 2x+6 the translation is not obvious. I guess our school is teaching "new math".
Its a variable shift here; different shift for each value of x. If the shift was constant, then it would be , e.g., sin(x+3).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K