Graphene: Questions from a Non-Chemist

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the properties and applications of graphene and graphite, particularly focusing on conductivity, the implications of graphene being a "2D material," and the feasibility of constructing three-dimensional structures from it. Participants explore these concepts from a chemistry perspective, with some referencing their backgrounds in physics and materials science.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions why graphite, composed of overlapping graphene sheets, is considered non-conductive, prompting others to clarify that graphite is indeed conductive.
  • There is a discussion about the nature of graphene as a "2D material," with some participants arguing that 2D objects can exist in three dimensions without issue.
  • Concerns are raised about the practicality of using graphene, which is one atom thick, for constructing larger structures like car chassis, with some suggesting that graphene is more suited for small-scale applications.
  • Participants discuss the distinction between graphene and graphite, with one noting that graphite is essentially a bulk form of graphene.
  • Some participants mention the potential for layering graphene sheets, but clarify that this would revert to graphite.
  • References to external sources, such as Wikipedia, are made to support claims about the properties of graphite and graphene.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that graphite is conductive, but there is no consensus on the practical applications of graphene in larger structures. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best uses of graphene and the implications of its 2D nature.

Contextual Notes

Some assumptions about the properties of graphene and graphite are not fully explored, and there are references to external sources that may contain additional information. The discussion does not resolve the complexities of using graphene in practical applications.

tim9000
Messages
866
Reaction score
17
Hi, I haven't had any chemistry exposure for over a decade, (I have some semi-conductor and quantum mechanics experience though) I was wondering:
(to my vague 'knowledge') If graphite is just made of many overlapped graphene sheets, then why isn't graphite conductive?
Also, if graphene is a "2D material", than how can we actually build out of it in 3 dimensions? (wouldn't that just be similar to graphite, but with larger sheets?)
Or does this '2D' structure just mean that applications of graphene are just going to be deposited on existing substrates in use? Or will it be a stand-alone material?
Thanks, (diagrams welcome)
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
If graphite is just made of many overlapped graphene sheets, then why isn't graphite conductive?
What makes you think graphite is not conductive?

...if graphene is a "2D material", than how can we actually build out of it in 3 dimensions
... 1. 2D objects fit into 3 dimensions just fine, what is the problem?
... 2. Graphine is 2D in the same way as a sheet of paper is 2D: i.e. actually a 3D material.

Here is how to make graphine:
https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn25442-make-graphene-in-your-kitchen-with-soap-and-a-blender/
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ProfuselyQuarky
Simon Bridge said:
What makes you think graphite is not conductive?... 1. 2D objects fit into 3 dimensions just fine, what is the problem?
... 2. Graphine is 2D in the same way as a sheet of paper is 2D: i.e. actually a 3D material.

Here is how to make graphine:
https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn25442-make-graphene-in-your-kitchen-with-soap-and-a-blender/
Thanks for the reply Simon (I've been meaning to get back to the other threads that I started earlier this year, and I will very soon).

Ah, I don't know why I thought it wasn't conductive.

Yeah, but it's one atom thick, how can I build a car chassis out of it? What distinguishes it from graphite? can you overlay single layers on top of each other and have them stick?

(interesting article)

Thanks
 
tim9000 said:
...I thought it [graphite] wasn't conductive.
From wikipedia:
Graphite's high thermal stability and electrical conductivity facilitate its widespread use as electrodes...

Yeah, but [graphine]'s one atom thick, how can I build a car chassis out of it?
You wouldn't. Graphine has utility in very small structures... wikipedia has an article on that too.
What distinguishes it from graphite?
Graphite is the name for a chunk of rock made out of graphine.
can you overlay single layers on top of each other and have them stick?
Kinda - then you'd have graphite.
Two sheets of graphene slip over each other.

All this is available for the googling though.
The best use of this site is for helping you understand sources you have found by other means.
 
Funny that people thought it couldn't exist in that state, yet graphite is a ready made naturally occurring example.
Simon Bridge said:
Graphite's high thermal stability and electrical conductivity facilitate its widespread use as electrodes
I wasn't second guessing you, I was just saying that I had an incorrect preconception.
Simon Bridge said:
very small structures
Yeah ok, I had just heard talk about application in aircrafts etc.
Simon Bridge said:
The best use of this site is for helping you understand sources you have found by other means.
Yeah, you're right. You're a good bloke; thanks for your help. (no need to reply to this)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
10K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K