Graphing Quadratic Functions: Domain, Range, and Factoring Help

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on graphing the quadratic function f(x) = x^2 and specifically addresses the transformation of the function 1/2f(2x+6) - 2. Participants clarify that while the term 2x can be factored, it cannot be factored out of the function f itself. The correct transformation is expressed as f(x) = -(1/2)f(2(x+3)) - 2, emphasizing the importance of maintaining the structure of the function during transformations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quadratic functions and their graphs
  • Knowledge of function transformations (vertical and horizontal shifts, stretches, and compressions)
  • Familiarity with factoring expressions
  • Basic proficiency in LaTeX for mathematical notation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of quadratic functions and their graphs
  • Learn about function transformations in detail
  • Practice factoring expressions involving functions
  • Explore LaTeX for writing mathematical equations clearly
USEFUL FOR

Students studying algebra, mathematics educators, and anyone looking to deepen their understanding of quadratic functions and their transformations.

Nelo
Messages
215
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Given f(x) = x^2 Sketch the graph of each of the following, state the domain and range.



- 1/2f(2x+6) -2

Homework Equations




y=x^2

The Attempt at a Solution



I Simply have a question. The question is, that this 2x can be factored out from the brackets correct?

Factoring that 2 will multiply it with the 1/2 and make the vertical stretch a factor of 1 , esentially, a factor of 0. No?

Or , would it create -1/2f(2(x+3) -2 , where the horizontal still exists as 2 (1/2) and the vertical still exists as 1/2 ?

Which one is it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Nelo said:

Homework Statement


Given f(x) = x^2 Sketch the graph of each of the following, state the domain and range.

- 1/2f(2x+6) -2

Homework Equations

y=x^2

The Attempt at a Solution



I Simply have a question. The question is, that this 2x can be factored out from the brackets correct?

Factoring that 2 will multiply it with the 1/2 and make the vertical stretch a factor of 1 , esentially, a factor of 0. No?

Or , would it create -1/2f(2(x+3) -2 , where the horizontal still exists as 2 (1/2) and the vertical still exists as 1/2 ?

Which one is it?

You need to use parentheses when writing your formulas so we can understand what your formula is. What all is in the denominator? And after the / your parentheses are unbalanced. Anyway, whatever you actually meant, no, you can not factor the two across the f, if that is what you are asking.
 
I think he/she's asking if you can factor out the 2 in 2x + 6, and the answer is yes, you can, as long as you don't bring it outside the f.

I'm guessing that he/she meant to write this:
f(x) = -(1/2)f(2x+6) - 2 = -(1/2)f(2(x+3)) - 2
or this:
[itex]f(x) = -\frac{1}{2}f(2x +6) - 2 = -\frac{1}{2}f(2(x +3)) - 2[/itex]

OP: Maybe you should learn LaTeX.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K