Gravimetric Analysis, Volatilization

  • Thread starter Thread starter Maharg
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Analysis
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the weight percent of Barium (Ba) in an unknown solid containing BaCl2·2H2O after heating. The original sample weighed 1.9226 g and lost 0.3579 g of water upon heating, resulting in a final weight of 1.5647 g. The calculated weight percent of Ba was initially found to be 53.67%, but this was deemed incorrect due to the possibility of other compounds in the sample. The correct approach involves using the formula weights of the compound and considering the loss of water to determine the theoretical percent of Ba.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gravimetric analysis principles
  • Familiarity with molar mass calculations
  • Knowledge of chemical formulas and hydration states
  • Ability to perform stoichiometric calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of gravimetric analysis in detail
  • Learn about the calculation of weight percent in chemical compounds
  • Research the effects of impurities on gravimetric measurements
  • Explore the concept of hydration and its impact on chemical analysis
USEFUL FOR

Chemistry students, laboratory technicians, and professionals involved in analytical chemistry and material characterization will benefit from this discussion.

Maharg
Messages
23
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Consider an unknown solid containing BaCl2. 2H2O (MW = 244.26296). When the unknown is heated to 160 °C for 1 h, the water of crystallization is driven off:

BaCl2.2H2O(s) ---> BaCl2(s)+ 2 H2O(g)

A sample originally weighing 1.9226 g weighed 1.5647 g after heating. Calculate the weight percent of Ba (MW=137.327) in the original sample. BaCl2: MW=208.2324; H2O: MW=18.0153


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I think I'm missing something with the water, but I'm not sure how to work it in.

I figured out mol of BaCl2*2H20
1.9226 g / 244.26296 g/mol = 7.8710 mmol

Calculated moles of BaCl2
1.5647 g/208.2324 g/mol = 7.514 mmol

Converted this to moles Ba

7.514 mmol * 137.327 g/mol = 1.0319026 g

Divided this by original weight to obtain w/w %

1.0319 g/1.9226 g = 53.67 %

This is not the right answer.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you already know the compound's composition, and you want to find the percent Barium in the sample, was the sample also wet with more than just water of crystalization? If it only had the water of crystalization, then you need none of the experiemental weighings. Just use formula weights of the compound.

You might have misworded your question, so I will take a thought path according to this idea. After heating, you only have weight of DRY, no water, BaCl2.
Percent BaCl2 = (1.5647g)*100/(1.9226g).

Now, can you simply find percent Ba in BaCl2 and finish your question?
 
That question is exactly word for word from the book.
 
Based on post #3, I also suggest you calculate the theoretical percent water of crystalization to your experimentally determined loss of mass from your sample.
 
Seems to me like there is something wrong with the question.

Unknow solid seems to be suggesting it is a mixture containing hydrated barium chloride and something else.

Heated sample lost 0.3579 g. Assuming it lost only water, that was 0.01987 moles of water. Assuming all water was from hydrated barium chloride, that means 9.933x10-3 moles of chloride. That in turn means 2.426 g of hydrated chloride, more than initial mass.

I have no idea what other assumptions can be made. If sample lost water and something else, amount of barium chloride can be anything.

I can be missing something, but I have no idea what else can be tried.
 
One thing I was just thinking. Would amount of Ba always be the same in the total sample because of moles?

Does it make sense to just take MW Ba/MW BaCl2*2H2O = 137.327/244.26296 = 56.22%
 
Maharg said:
Would amount of Ba always be the same in the total sample because of moles?

In the pure dihydrate of barium chloride - yes. But you are not told it's a pure substance, quite the opposite - you are told it is "unknown soild containing". That suggests other compounds are present as well.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K