Gravitation - gravitational attraction due to a nearby mountain range

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves analyzing the gravitational attraction exerted by a nearby mountain range on a plumb bob. It considers a model where the mountain range is represented as an infinite half-cylinder with specific density and radius, and seeks to determine the angle of deflection of the plumb bob from the vertical. The discussion also explores a second model where the mountain is floating in a denser fluid, leading to a zero deflection scenario.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the calculation of the gravitational field and the forces acting on the plumb bob, with one participant attempting to derive the angle of deflection based on gravitational contributions. Others question the assumptions regarding mass densities and their implications on the gravitational effects, particularly in the context of the second model.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different interpretations of the gravitational effects and the role of mass density. Some guidance has been offered regarding the relationship between mass density and gravitational force, but no consensus has been reached on the implications of these factors.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of the assumption that the mountain range can be modeled as an infinite half-cylinder and the conditions under which the gravitational effects are considered, specifically noting the limits of r_0 compared to a.

Wavefunction
Messages
99
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement



The gravitational attraction due to a nearby mountain range might be expected to cause a plumb
bob to hang at an angle slightly different from the vertical. If a mountain range could be
represented by an infinite half-cylinder of radius a and density ρ lying on a flat plane (see
attached image), show that a plumb bob at a distance r_0 from the cylinder axis would be deflected
by an angle θ ≈ \frac{πa^2Gρ}{r_0g}. You can assume that θ << 1 and r_0 >> a. In actual measurements
of this effect, the observed deflection is much smaller. Next assume that the mountain range
can be represented by a cylinder of radius a and density ρ which is floating in a fluid of density
2ρ as illustrated. Show that the plumb-bob deflection due to the mountain range is zero in this
model. Since the latter result is in much better agreement with observations, it is postulated that
mountains, and also continents, are in isostatic equilibrium with the underlying mantle rock.

Homework Equations



ψ_g=\iint \vec{g_c}\cdot\vec{dA} = -4πρG and ∑τ=0

The Attempt at a Solution



Part A) First I need to calculate the gravitational field \vec{g_c}. Because the mountain is approximated as an infinite half cylinder the only contribution comes from the thin slice of directly in front of the plum-bob.

ψ_g = \iint\|\vec{g_c}\|\|\vec{dA}||cosθ = -4πρG →\|\vec{g_c}\| \iint \|\vec{dA}\| = -4πρG → \|\vec{g_c}\|π(r_0) = -4πρG → \|\vec{g_c}\| = \frac{-4ρG}{r_0} \Rightarrow \|\vec{F_c}\| = \frac{-4ρGm(πa^2)}{2r_0}

Now the other force acting on the bob is the Earth's gravitaional force given near surface of the Earth is: \|\vec{F_g}\|=-mg

Now consider the torque given by both forces acting on the plum-bob: ∑τ=0 → -Lmgsin(θ)-L[\frac{-2ρGπa^2}{r_0}]sin(Θ) = 0 where θ+Θ=90° so θ<<1 \Rightarrow Θ≈90 then the above equation simplifies to: mgθ≈\frac{2ρGπa^2m}{r_0} → θ≈\frac{2πa^2Gρ}{r_0 g} and since the angle is small to begin with the factor of 2 can be neglected so I get the predicted result

Part B) I'm not really sure where to go with the next part so any hints would be greatly appreciated. What I do know: The Earth's gravitation field is much stronger than the field due to the infinite half cylinder's (mountain's) and there is a buoyant force acting on the plum bob opposite to the Earth's gravitational field. This lead me to believe there was a balancing viscous force due to the fluid, but I'm unsure of this.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
What water? The continents are thought to float on the mantle, which is a fluid composed of molten rock.
 
I'm sorry I meant to say mantle not water
 
Hi Wavefunction. Have you considered that the mass densities on either side of the pendulum are the same? At least in the condition r>>a, the force due to the mountain would equal zero because all that would matter would be the mass densities and not the specific mass distributions.

Edit: Also, my first post here.
Is this what it's like to contribute to the internet?
 
Last edited:
batmanPhysics said:
Hi Wavefunction. Have you considered that the mass densities on either side of the pendulum are the same? At least in the condition r>>a, the force due to the mountain would equal zero because all that would matter would be the mass densities and not the specific mass distributions.

Edit: Also, my first post here.
Is this what it's like to contribute to the internet?

Could you explain how the mass density matters more than the specific mass distribution in this case? Are you basically saying that that I take my answer from a and then take the limit as r_0 →∞ (Apply r_0\ll a) because that would give me my answer.
 

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
11K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K