B Gravitational Potential Energy & Mass Change: Andrew's Question

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on whether separating two masses, M and m, increases the system's mass due to the work done, in accordance with the equation e=mc^2. It is suggested that the work done to separate the masses contributes to the gravitational binding energy, leading to an increase in mass by an amount proportional to the work done. If energy is supplied from an external source, the overall mass of the system would increase, while no mass change would occur if the energy was already present in the system. When treated as point masses, the system's mass is greater than the sum of M and m after separation, reflecting the work done. The conversation emphasizes the relationship between gravitational potential energy and mass change in isolated systems.
andrew s 1905
Messages
238
Reaction score
95
TL;DR
Does the work done in separating two masses increase their mass in accordance with e=mc^2
If I start with two, otherwise isolated, masses M and m initially together and do work to separate them then the work done, I assume, goes into the gravitational binding energy between them. Will the system of mass M and m have increased in mass due to this in accordance with e=mc^2?

I believe yes as it is broadly analogous to chemical or nuclear binding.

If I am wrong please provide some pointers in the right direction.

Thanks Andrew
PS this is not a homework question I am 70 and not formally studying it's for personal interest.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think for this question to make sense you need to be far enough away from the masses for them to be treated as a single point mass at all times. Otherwise you can't really characterise the gravitational field in terms of "the mass", since it depends on the mass distribution even in Newtonian gravity.

But then you run into the problem of where the energy came from to move the masses apart. Was it already there, e.g. in the form of rocket fuel? Or was it supplied from outside, e.g. by shining a laser on to a solar sail on one of the masses? In the first case I would not expect the overall mass to change because no energy was added to the system, but in the second I would expect it to change because energy was supplied.
 
Thanks, it was intended to be very simplified and I did intend the energy to be supplied from outside the system. Regards Andrew
 
Last edited:
andrew s 1905 said:
Will the system of mass M and m have increased in mass due to this in accordance with e=mc^2?
Assuming we are working with point masses, the mass of the system is greater than ##M+m## and it increased by an amount ##W/c^2##, where ##W## is the work you did separating them.
 
Mister T said:
Assuming we are working with point masses, the mass of the system is greater than ##M+m## and it increased by an amount ##W/c^2##, where ##W## is the work you did separating them.
If we are treating gravitational potential energy has having a mass equivalent then...

The mass of a gravitationally bound system will be less than the sum ##M+m##. But after being separated by the applied work, the energy deficit ("binding energy") is reduced by an increment of ##W/c^2##.
 
The Poynting vector is a definition, that is supposed to represent the energy flow at each point. Unfortunately, the only observable effect caused by the Poynting vector is through the energy variation in a volume subject to an energy flux through its surface, that is, the Poynting theorem. As a curl could be added to the Poynting vector without changing the Poynting theorem, it can not be decided by EM only that this should be the actual flow of energy at each point. Feynman, commenting...