Gravitational Pull: Sun vs. Earth's on Moon

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter acvessey
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravitational Pull
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the gravitational interactions between the Sun, Earth, and Moon, specifically addressing the claim that the Sun's gravitational pull on the Moon is greater than that of the Earth. Participants explore the implications of mass, distance, and orbital mechanics in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the logic behind the statement that the Sun's gravitational pull on the Moon is greater than Earth's, suggesting that the Sun's lower density and greater distance should result in a weaker pull.
  • Another participant provides a mathematical perspective, stating that the Sun's mass relative to the Earth and the distances involved support the claim that the Sun's pull is indeed greater.
  • A different participant suggests calculating gravitational forces using Newton's law of gravitation based on the masses and distances of the Sun, Moon, and Earth.
  • One participant explains the dynamics of the Earth-Moon system and its orbit around the Sun, emphasizing the role of velocity and centrifugal force in preventing both bodies from falling into the Sun.
  • The initial participant reiterates their skepticism about the Sun's gravitational influence compared to Earth's, questioning the tidal effects and the behavior of objects in free fall.
  • A later reply discusses the mutual gravitational attraction between the Earth and Moon, noting that both bodies are in free fall around the Sun.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the gravitational influences of the Sun and Earth on the Moon, with no consensus reached regarding the validity of the original statement. The discussion remains unresolved with competing perspectives on the topic.

Contextual Notes

Participants rely on various assumptions about gravitational forces, mass, and distance, which may not be fully articulated or agreed upon. The discussion includes mathematical reasoning that is not universally accepted among participants.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals interested in gravitational physics, orbital mechanics, and the dynamics of celestial bodies may find this discussion relevant.

acvessey
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi. I'm totally new to this forum because I am not seeing what I would refer to as 'logic' on wiki.
I'll make this one easy for someone! Can anyone direct me to a website which might clearly explain the following statement:
"The Sun's gravitational pull on the Moon is over twice as great as the Earth's pull on the Moon": copied from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orbit_of_the_Moon
Surely a low density and relatively small (distant) attractor such as our Sun, have a lesser pull than a high density, relatively large (close) object such as our Earth on our Moon? otherwise the Moon would not be in Earth's orbit but rather, falling out of our orbit and toward the sun. Isn't that why the Moon has a huge tidal effect on our oceans but the Sun has bugger-all? Doesn't a rock and feather fall toward an attractor at the same rate in a vacuum!
Cheers.
Tony V
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Do the math. The Sun is 333000 times as massive as is the Earth, and is 389 times further from the Moon that is the Earth. 333000/389^2 = 2.2.
 
Or look up the masses of the sun, moon and earth, and the distances between the Earth and sun (which is the same as the average distance between the moon and the sun) and between the Earth and moon, and calculate the gravitational forces using Newton's law of gravitation.
 
acvessey said:
otherwise the Moon would not be in Earth's orbit but rather, falling out of our orbit and toward the sun.
The moon is traveling at 30km/s ±1km/s around the Sun. The 30km/s is what prevents both the Earth and the Moon from falling onto the Sun. The ±1km/s is due to orbit around the Earth.

The way to look at it is that you can consider the Earth-Moon system going around the Sun from a rotating frame in which Earth remains fixed (ignoring elipticity of the orbit). In that rotating frame, centrifugal force acts on both Earth and Moon and keeps both from falling onto the Sun. In addition to that, the Moon is going around in circles around Earth with gravity providing centripetal force for that motion. There is, of course, also the Coriolis effect, which will alter the Moon's orbital period slightly.
 
acvessey said:
Surely a low density and relatively small (distant) attractor such as our Sun, have a lesser pull than a high density, relatively large (close) object such as our Earth on our Moon? otherwise the Moon would not be in Earth's orbit but rather, falling out of our orbit and toward the sun. Isn't that why the Moon has a huge tidal effect on our oceans but the Sun has bugger-all? Doesn't a rock and feather fall toward an attractor at the same rate in a vacuum!
Cheers.
Tony V

Imagine you are in free fall towards the Earth. (We are going to ignore things like friction from air and such) You have a ball that you let go along side you. Both you and the ball fall at the same rate. If you could fall for a long enough period of time you would see that you and the ball start to move towards each other thanks to your mutual gravity.

The same effect occurs with the Earth and Moon. Both are in free fall around the Sun thanks to its gravity, and both are also attracted to each other, forming another orbital system.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
4K