Gravitational Self Potential Energy

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The gravitational self potential energy (PE) of a solid ball with mass density ρ and radius R is derived using the formula PE = -GMM/R. When the radius is doubled to 2R, the mass increases to 8 times the original due to constant density, resulting in a new potential energy that is 32 times greater than the original. The relationship between gravitational potential energy, mass, and radius is critical for understanding how changes in these parameters affect energy calculations. The discussion emphasizes the importance of correctly applying dimensional analysis and understanding the constants involved.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gravitational potential energy equations
  • Familiarity with dimensional analysis
  • Knowledge of mass density and its implications
  • Basic principles of gravitational forces and constants
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the derivation of gravitational potential energy for solid spheres
  • Learn about the implications of mass density on gravitational calculations
  • Explore the role of the gravitational constant (G) in energy equations
  • Study advanced dimensional analysis techniques in physics
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on gravitational theory, as well as educators and anyone interested in the mathematical relationships governing gravitational potential energy.

Rmehtany
Messages
27
Reaction score
2
Note: I know this question has been asked before, but I wasn't allowed to ask my question on that thread

1. Homework Statement

The gravitational self potential energy of a solid ball of mass density ρ and radius R is E. What is the gravitational self potential energy of a ball of mass density ρ and radius 2R?

Homework Equations


$$PE = -\frac{GMM}{R}$$

The Attempt at a Solution


My attempt was dimensional analysis, because I had no other idea on how to approach this. The energy was somehow going to be related to G, radius, density, and other constants. PE has units $$kg \frac{m^2}{s^2}$$, density $$\frac{kg}{m^3}$$, and G in terms of $$\frac{m^3}{s^2}$$. I tried using E = $$k G^a \rho^b R^c$$, but I couldn't eliminate enough masses from the equation.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Rmehtany said:
G in terms of ##\frac{m^3}{s^2}##.
These are not the units for G.

Otherwise, your approach should work.

See if it works out once you have the correct units for G. If not, post the details of your attempt.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Rmehtany
TSny said:
These are not the units for G.

Otherwise, your approach should work.

See if it works out once you have the correct units for G. If not, post the details of your attempt.
I will try that, but are there other ways to solve this question? I kinda think my method is a bit sloppy.
 
Rmehtany said:
I will try that, but are there other ways to solve this question? I kinda think my method is a bit sloppy.
Yes. Look at the equation you wrote for the PE of two point masses. This equation tells you how to dimensionally get PE from G, M and R. Thus, you need to think about relating M to density and R so that you can see how PE is related to G, ρ, and R.
 
TSny said:
Yes. Look at the equation you wrote for the PE of two point masses. This equation tells you how to dimensionally get PE from G, M and R. Thus, you need to think about relating M to density and R so that you can see how PE is related to G, ρ, and R.

Uh huh, so let me see if I understand you:

The mass will be 8 times the original mass of the ball due to unvarying density, and radius is doubled. Since $$PE = \frac{-GMM}{R}$$, this equals $$\frac{8^2}{2}$$ = 32 times? Is that correct?
 
Yes, that's correct. The actual formula for the gravitational PE of a solid sphere will have some numerical factor out front, but it must be proportional to GM2/R.
 
Thank you for helping
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
14K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K