Gravitational time dilation for a spherical body of finite radius

In summary: Schwarzschild Radius and r is the radius of the clock compared to one at infinity, however, this can't be used for r=0. If you are inside the sphere, the gravitational time dilation is given by the term inside the first brackets, otherwise it is given by the term inside the second brackets.
  • #1
GeorgeDishman
419
29
I am considering the gravitational time dilation at the centre of a spherical, non-rotating body (such as the Earth). The usual formula for gravitational time dilation is √(1-r_s/r) where r_s is the Schwarzschild Radius and r is the radius of the clock compared to one at infinity, however, this can't be used for r=0.

I believe the gravitational potential can also be used and the Newtonian approximation gives

V = -GM/r for r>a

V = -GM/2a(3-(r/a)^2) for r<a

where a is the radius of the body

Assuming a >> r_s, can that formula be used to find the time dilation at any radius or is the use of the potential only valid outside the sphere? Is there a more accurate fully relativistic method?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
You can certainly use the Newtonian approximation if you wish, assuming that the fluid making up the source is a Newtonian fluid, but you can also very easily do this relativistically for a static spherically symmetric fluid star such that the fluid has no viscosity or heat conduction between fluid elements. You can find derivations and analyses of such static spherically symmetric perfect fluid solutions to Einstein's equation in just about every general relativity text. Once you have such an interior solution (i.e. the interior metric) and use the fact that Birkhoff's theorem forces the exterior space-time geometry to be Schwarzschild, you can straightforwardly derive gravitational time dilation using the usual technique.

See chapter 10 of Schutz "A First Course in General Relativity", section 6.2 of Wald "General Relativity", chapter 7 of Straumann "General Relativity", chapter 10 of Hobson et al. "General Relativity: An Introduction for Physicists", and chapter 16 of Stephani et al. "Exact Solutions of Einstein's Field Equations".
 
  • #3
GeorgeDishman said:
Is there a more accurate fully relativistic method?

Schwarzschild's interior solution:
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?p=1543402#post1543402

The gravitational time dilation factor inside a uniform sphere is given by the term inside the first brackets.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
  • #4
  • #5


Thank you for your question. I can confirm that the formula for gravitational time dilation at the center of a spherical body of finite radius can indeed be derived using the gravitational potential, as you have mentioned. This approach is known as the Newtonian approximation and is valid for distances much larger than the Schwarzschild radius. However, for a more accurate and fully relativistic method, we need to use the Schwarzschild metric, which takes into account the curvature of spacetime caused by the mass of the sphere.

Using this metric, we can calculate the time dilation at any radius, including at the center of the sphere. The formula for gravitational time dilation in this case is given by √(1-r_s/r_c), where r_c is the distance from the center of the sphere to the clock. This formula is valid for any value of r_c, including r_c=0. Therefore, the use of the potential is not limited to outside the sphere, but the Schwarzschild metric provides a more accurate and comprehensive approach for calculating time dilation.

In conclusion, while the Newtonian approximation using the gravitational potential can be used to calculate time dilation at the center of a spherical body, a more accurate and fully relativistic approach is to use the Schwarzschild metric. I hope this helps clarify your understanding of gravitational time dilation.
 

1. What is gravitational time dilation?

Gravitational time dilation is the phenomenon where time moves slower in the presence of a strong gravitational field. This means that clocks in a stronger gravitational field will tick slower compared to clocks in a weaker gravitational field.

2. How does the radius of a spherical body affect gravitational time dilation?

The radius of a spherical body does not have a significant effect on gravitational time dilation. However, it can affect the strength of the gravitational field, which in turn can affect the amount of time dilation.

3. Why is gravitational time dilation important?

Gravitational time dilation is important because it has been proven by several experiments and plays a crucial role in our understanding of time, gravity, and the universe. It also has practical applications in technologies such as GPS systems.

4. How is gravitational time dilation calculated for a spherical body of finite radius?

The formula for calculating gravitational time dilation for a spherical body of finite radius is t' = t√(1-2GM/rc^2), where t' is the time measured by the observer, t is the time measured in a weaker gravitational field, G is the gravitational constant, M is the mass of the body, r is the distance from the center of the body, and c is the speed of light.

5. Does the theory of relativity explain gravitational time dilation?

Yes, the theory of relativity, specifically the general theory of relativity, explains gravitational time dilation as a consequence of the curvature of spacetime caused by the presence of massive objects. This theory has been extensively tested and has been shown to accurately predict the amount of time dilation in various scenarios.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
19
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
43
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
16
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
36
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
58
Views
3K
Back
Top