I am using the matched filtering technique to extract the data from a heavy noise background in the process of detection of gravitational waves. I calculate the correlation between the experimental data and a theoretical template.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I have been told that the maximum of the correlation function will be the signal to noise ratio. Just for confirming this, I just took an example.

I generated a sine function (pure sine wave), and then added gaussian white noise(mean=0, variance=1) to it. Now I cross-correlate these two, ie pure sine wave and sine wave added with noise. I used the correlation theorm to calculate it, ie doing an fft and taking the ifft of it. I find that the maximum value turns out to be somewhere between 40 and 65.

Now for checking whether that is the true snr, I tried calculating the snr as

snr=(Amplitude of Signal/ Amplitude of noise)^2;

I calculated the amplitude as the rms value in both the cases(signal and noise). The answer always turned out to be somewhere between 0.38 and 0.65 or around. I am not able to understand my mistake and whether I am correct in checking the snr like this.

For further clarification, I did the same thing with a gaussian signal, and found a similar problem. Can any one please tell me, where am I going wrong???

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Gravitational wave data analysis. More of Signal processing techniques

Loading...

Similar Threads - Gravitational wave data | Date |
---|---|

Fourier transform for the wave vector dervation problem | Jan 30, 2015 |

Dickey Fuller Test Sine Wave or seasonallity | Aug 27, 2014 |

Why sine wave has such a pdf? | Oct 14, 2012 |

Finding error on gravitational acceleration | Oct 6, 2012 |

Recent wave of US police murders: statistically significant? | Jan 26, 2011 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**