I Gravitational wave effects on different materials

  • Thread starter Thread starter Andy DS
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
Gravitational waves induce differential effects on materials, with softer items like ripe tomatoes distorting more than rigid objects like iron balls. LIGO's design relies on free-moving mirrors to detect these waves, and while the mirrors are not rigidly mounted, their relative movement is crucial for measurement. The sensitivity of LIGO is not significantly enhanced by mounting it on a softer base, as the primary concern is to suppress ground vibrations rather than enhance detection. Current designs focus on maintaining rigidity to minimize noise interference from Earth. Future proposals include space-based detectors, which could further improve sensitivity by eliminating ground-related distortions.
Andy DS
Messages
21
Reaction score
3
TL;DR
Do gravitational waves squash soft materials more than stiff ones?
Given that the Earth's gravity will distort, say, a soft fruit like a ripe tomato more than an iron ball, can we say gravitational waves from space have the same differential effects on these and other common earthly items.
Does LIGO experience the effects of gravitational waves due to the distortion of the planet, if so could it be made more sensitive by mounting it on a soft more conformable base.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
The gravitational wave will induce strains in the object, and its internal forces will dictate how it responds. So the result will depend on material stiffness, yes.

Gravitational wave detectors are essentially free-to-move mirrors and a device that measures the distance between them. They have zero rigidity, ideally. Earth-based detectors need extremely rigid casings and very carefully designed mirror mounts to avoid transmitting vibration from the Earth to the detector. That's not really about detection of gravitational waves, though, just about suppressing noise.

I believe rigid-bar detectors were once suggested, but the LIGO type is more sensitive.
 
Last edited:
OK, so the mirrors aren't rigidly mounted and their position will be perturbed relative to the ground by the passing waves.
 
The mirrors move relative to each other (or at least, the distance between them changes). The ground is (ideally) not relevant to the operation of the detector. In fact, there are proposals for space-based sensors where the mirrors are on separate satellites.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laser_Interferometer_Space_Antenna
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes FactChecker, ohwilleke and PeroK
Andy DS said:
TL;DR Summary: Do gravitational waves squash soft materials more than stiff ones?

Given that the Earth's gravity will distort, say, a soft fruit like a ripe tomato more than an iron ball, can we say gravitational waves from space have the same differential effects on these and other common earthly items.
Does LIGO experience the effects of gravitational waves due to the distortion of the planet, if so could it be made more sensitive by mounting it on a soft more conformable base.
https://www.ligo.caltech.edu/page/ligo-technology
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes FactChecker, ohwilleke, Ibix and 1 other person
"Pop III stars are thought to be composed entirely of helium and hydrogen with trace amounts of lithium, the ingredients left over after the Big Bang. They formed early on, around 200 million years after the universe began. These stars are extremely rare because they died out long ago, although scientists have hoped that the faint light from these distant, ancient objects would be detectable. Previous Population III candidates have been ruled out because they didn't meet the three main...

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
641
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K