Gravitationally bound, ionized cloud of hydrogen

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Loren Booda
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bound Cloud Hydrogen
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the evolution of an isolated, spherical cloud of ionized hydrogen at temperature T as it approaches gravitational-electromagnetic equilibrium. Participants explore theoretical implications, stability, and potential outcomes related to such a cloud, including its relation to known astronomical bodies like nebulae and protostars.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question whether the discussion pertains to specific astronomical phenomena like protostars or nebulae, or if it remains purely theoretical.
  • One participant expresses uncertainty about the cloud's stability and symmetry, raising concerns about whether the cloud can maintain equilibrium given the forces at play.
  • Another participant suggests that a completely ionized cloud would not achieve equilibrium due to the overwhelming repulsive electrostatic forces compared to gravitational forces, proposing that a partially ionized cloud may be a more realistic scenario.
  • There is a discussion about the escape velocity of charged hydrogen atoms and how temperature affects the dynamics of the cloud, with some suggesting that only the fastest atoms may escape under certain conditions.
  • One participant introduces external references to phase transitions in strongly-interacting matter, although the relevance to the original question about electrodynamics is questioned by another participant.
  • Clarifications are sought regarding the initial formation of the hydrogen cloud and its evolution towards a quasi-gravitational equilibrium.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus, as there are multiple competing views regarding the nature of the cloud, its stability, and the forces involved. The discussion remains unresolved with various hypotheses presented.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the assumptions underlying the formation and behavior of the hydrogen cloud, particularly regarding the degree of ionization and the implications for gravitational-electromagnetic equilibrium.

Loren Booda
Messages
3,115
Reaction score
4
An isolated, spherical cloud of ionized hydrogen at temperature T initially nears gravitational-electromagnetic equilibrium. How will the cloud's structure evolve?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Is there a more specific question buried here, about protostars, or nebulae, or HII regions, or is this purely theoretical?
 
I would like to know what eventually manifests from the given theoretical state: whether the cloud remains spherically symmetric; whether the situation is stable; what known bodies (like the ones you mention) might coalesce from such an idealization; and the relation between temperature and size (analogous to the Jeans radius) of this significantly charged cloud.
 
Loren Booda said:
An isolated, spherical cloud of ionized hydrogen at temperature T initially nears gravitational-electromagnetic equilibrium. How will the cloud's structure evolve?

everytime I think of this I get a different answer, makes my head spin...

first I thought you meant a cloud of COMPLETELY ionized hydrogen. but if you consider two ionized H atoms (i.e. protons), the repulsive eletrostatic force will overpower the attractive garvitational force by a factor of 10^36, so they will just fly apart. there cannot be any equilibrium position because both forces go down with 1/r^2.

so I guess you meant PARTIALLY ionized. consider two clouds, each containing 10^36 neutral H atoms and one ionized H+ atom. when one cloud looks at the other it will neither be repulsed nor attracted, there is gravitational-electrostatic equilibrium. so you might as well unite both clouds, or an arbitrary number of them, you just have to maintain the relation of 1 / 1^36 from charged to noncharged atoms.

but as both forces are in equilibrium, the escape-velocity of the system is 0 (for a charged H+ atom). since you have a temperature T, and an assoicated velocitey distribution, the fastest H+ atoms will leave the cloud very quickly. until for the remaining H+ atoms the gravitational force will dominate, so there is a non-zero escape velocity and only a few (the fastest H+ atoms in the velocity distribution) can escape.
 
Gravitationally bound, ionized cloud of hydrogen
Your question can only be answered by looking at your assumptions. How did the hydrogen became a “cloud”?

http://search.arxiv.org:8081/paper.j...iquid&byDate=1
The Phase Diagram of Strongly-Interacting Matter
Authors: P. Braun-Munzinger, J. Wambach
(Submitted on 28 Jan 2008)
---------
http://arxiv.org/abs/nucl-th/0610084
Phase transition from hadronic matter to quark matter
Authors: P. Wang, A. W. Thomas, A. G. Williams
last revised 3 Apr 2007
The phase transition from nuclear matter to quark matter is always first order, whereas the transition between color superconducting quark matter and normal quark matter is second order. The phase transition between hadronic matter and quark matter can only occur at high density or temperature.
--------
I have more links in this blog entry
https://www.physicsforums.com/blogs/jal-58039/warm-dense-matter-wdm-solid-hydrogen-1291/
-------
jal
 
Last edited by a moderator:
jal,

At first glance, I do not understand the application of the articles you cite to a problem of electrodynamics. Perhaps you would condense your ideas into a paragraph or two.

The hydrogen in my question would have become a cloud much like any nebula originally evolved from a collection of gas. A certain percentage of the cloud is assumed ionized as the whole reaches a quasi-gravitational equilibrium. What are the relatively stable states of this gas, like nebulae and protostars, and more importantly, what might cause electromagnetic disequilibrium there?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Sticky
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
11K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K