MHB Gravity on Earth: Does Height Change It?

  • Thread starter Thread starter yakin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Earth Gravity
yakin
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
Does gravity on Earth stays constant regardless of height?. For instance, if a person standing at a mountain would he experiences the same gravity as the person standing on the ground?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
yakin said:
Does gravity on Earth stays constant regardless of height?. For instance, if a person standing at a mountain would he experiences the same gravity as the person standing on the ground?

Not quite, but almost. For instance, astronauts on the ISS still feel gravity (otherwise they would be flung into outer space) but at only about $8.76 \mathrm{m}/\mathrm{s}^2$, compared to the $9.81 \mathrm{m}/\mathrm{s}^2$ surface gravity. The reason they are weightless is because the rest of the station is also moving with them, so they have (near) zero acceleration in the station's reference frame, and the reason they don't crash into the Earth is because they are in orbit.

The formula to calculate gravity at an arbitrary height $h > 0$ can be obtained from the Earth's surface gravity ($g_0 = 9.81 \mathrm{m}/\mathrm{s}^2$) and its radius $r = 6371 \mathrm{km}$, and is as follows:
$$g_h = g_0 \left ( \frac{r}{r + h} \right )^2$$
This can be obtained from Newton's law of gravitation, basically since gravity is inversely proportional to distance squared, you can take the squared ratio of the distances to get a ratio of gravity at different heights. This is assuming the Earth is a perfect sphere, which is not quite true, but anyway, plugging in some numbers, say $h = 9 \mathrm{km}$ (Mount Everest):
$$g_{9 \mathrm{km}} = 9.78$$
So, even standing on the highest mountain, the Earth's gravity is still very strong.

However, because the Earth is actually not a perfect sphere, but is elongated at the equator, people living at the poles weigh more than people on the equator (by a small but measurable amount). As a less extreme example, take your average person who weighs $60 \mathrm{kg}$ and lives in, say, southern Australia, where gravity is approximately $9.8 \mathrm{m}/\mathrm{s}^2$. If he were to travel to central Africa (the equator), he would feel slightly lighter, as if he only weighed $59.88 \mathrm{kg}$. Of course his mass didn't change, but gravity has, and so his scale (unless calibrated to the new gravity somehow) will show that he weighs a couple hundred grams less :D

Of course this isn't quite true because there's more than gravity at work here, there are also centrifugal effects from the Earth's rotation, and the fact that gravity does not depend strictly on distance from the Earth's center (it also depends on the mass distribution of the Earth, which is actually quite complicated), etc... but to answer your question, yes, gravity does get weaker as you go further away from the Earth, but it isn't noticeable unless you go a few hundred kilometres high.
 
yakin said:
Does gravity on Earth stays constant regardless of height?. For instance, if a person standing at a mountain would he experiences the same gravity as the person standing on the ground?

I presume that the question is really more intending to ask if a person suspended from a balloon at a given height above a smoothly round Earth would experience the same or less gravity as a person standing on the surface of said earth. The answer then is that the person suspended above the surface would experience less gravity.

OTOH, a person standing on a mountain at the given height would experience a greater gravity than when suspended from a balloon but probably less than when standing on the surface.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Replies
28
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
239
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
69
Views
7K
Back
Top