Gravity verses electromagnetic attraction

  • Thread starter pulsar28
  • Start date
  • #1
pulsar28
7
0
We`ve seen how particles in zero gravity form clumps through electro magnetic attraction, and that these clumps will then develop gravitational forces. Isn`t then gravity merely the same as this electro magnetic attraction only on a larger scale?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
lzkelley
277
2
Although many if not most hold onto the hope that some time (most likely long from now) all of the fundamental forces will somehow be unified... according to our understanding, gravity and E&M are very different.
For instance, E&M forces don't act on things without charge (i.e. neutral sums of charged particles or neutrinos(?) ).
Similarly, gravity doesn't effect massless particles (i.e. photons).
The details of the differences aren't too important, but another one of the main things, is that gravity is about a billion times weaker than the E&M forces.
 
  • #3
malawi_glenn
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
6,003
1,427
Gravity does indeed affect massless particles, see 'gravitational red shift' etc.
 
  • #4
Nabeshin
Science Advisor
2,207
16
Also, gravity is strictly an attractive force, whereas electromagnetism can work to attract or repel.
 
  • #5
malawi_glenn
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
6,003
1,427
electromagnetism can be "sheilded", gravity can not, since there is no such things as "negative" mass
 
  • #6
lzkelley
277
2
Gravity does indeed affect massless particles, see 'gravitational red shift' etc.

You are absolutely correct that the presence of gravity does change the observational nature of massless particles; but at the same time i think its worth noting that its not gravity that is causing such a change (for instance redshift) - but the bending of space due to gravitational fields (to my knowledge)... this is really semantics - but i think it does illustrate an important conceptual different.
 
  • #7
NerfMonkey
36
1
Also, gravity is strictly an attractive force, whereas electromagnetism can work to attract or repel.

In some cases gravity can be repulsive instead of attractive. But in every day circumstances you're right.
 
  • #8
Wallace
Science Advisor
1,256
0
You are absolutely correct that the presence of gravity does change the observational nature of massless particles; but at the same time i think its worth noting that its not gravity that is causing such a change (for instance redshift) - but the bending of space due to gravitational fields (to my knowledge)... this is really semantics - but i think it does illustrate an important conceptual different.

The 'bending of space' is simply a qualitative description of how gravity effects the motion of particles. It is not something different from gravity, it is gravity, if it is anything.
 
  • #9
Nabeshin
Science Advisor
2,207
16
In some cases gravity can be repulsive instead of attractive. But in every day circumstances you're right.

Elaborate. I am mystified.
 
  • #10
malawi_glenn
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
6,003
1,427
You are absolutely correct that the presence of gravity does change the observational nature of massless particles; but at the same time i think its worth noting that its not gravity that is causing such a change (for instance redshift) - but the bending of space due to gravitational fields (to my knowledge)... this is really semantics - but i think it does illustrate an important conceptual different.


Gravity IS bending of space, according to the theories of Einstein
 
  • #11
W3pcq
94
0
Maybe it is like the difference between a wave and a current in water in a way?
 
  • #12
malawi_glenn
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
6,003
1,427
Maybe it is like the difference between a wave and a current in water in a way?

The theory of both EM and gravity is well known, and it is nothing like what you are trying to ascribe.
 
  • #13
W3pcq
94
0
What I was trying to say is that maybe they are both different types of the same thing. By the way, what is "the theory of both EM and Gravity"? It is my impression that science still does not know exactly what EM is, or what the cause of gravity is. We know how to measure it and make predictions, but linking them would require a better understanding of what they are.
 
Last edited:
  • #14
malawi_glenn
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
6,003
1,427
Ooop I should have written the "theories" ;-)
Unification of EM and Gravity is not done yet.

And please, specify: What are you referring to in your posts?

"Maybe it is ... " (What is 'it' referring to?)
"... that maybe they are both ... (What is 'they' referring to?)
 
  • #15
W3pcq
94
0
Gravity, and EM is what I am referring to. If they can be unified, they must be linked somehow. The same way E=mc2, maybe gravity and em are phenomena of the same fundamentals. Comparing EM to a current, and G to a wave is to me an interesting way of looking at it because EM is a current of photons yet gravity is not a current of particles but instead it is a change in the structure of space just as a wave is not a current but instead it is a change in the structure, or a curvature of the ocean.
 
  • #16
malawi_glenn
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
6,003
1,427
Have you done "Classic Electrodynamics" in collage / university yet? I am referring to "because EM is a current of photons "

unifying all physical theories into one, has always been a goal. String Theories are the candidates for this task today, even though their reasoning are quite a bit more intricate than yours.
 
  • #17
W3pcq
94
0
Even if they come up with the right series of 1's or whatever they are trying to do, what will they understand after the math works?
 
  • #18
malawi_glenn
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
6,003
1,427
How to unify Gravity with Quantum field theories.
 
  • #19
W3pcq
94
0
Even if they do that, there will still be room for interpretation of what it all means. They will be able to do a whole new level of predictions which will allow huge advances in science which is totally awesome. That doesn't mean that no one can wonder what the findings mean philosophically.
 
  • #20
nuby
336
0
Has it been proven or shown how mass creates a gravitation field? Where does the "gravity" come from within an atom? Do neutrons have something to do with gravity?
 
  • #21
malawi_glenn
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
6,003
1,427
W3pcq: I concern physics. The OP asked a physics related question and he should get the answer from contemporary physics, not just speculations from laymen non-physicists (see the forum rules), they you may keep to yourself or post elsewhere.


nuby: All mass generates gravity, just not the neutron.
 
  • #22
nuby
336
0
Everyone knows mass generates gravity. But how can mass do it?
 
  • #23
malawi_glenn
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
6,003
1,427
I answered your question "has neutrons anything to do with mass".

Well a simple answer would be: Mass bends space-time, which is gravity (bending in space time).
 
  • #24
Redbelly98
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
12,145
166
In some cases gravity can be repulsive instead of attractive. But in every day circumstances you're right.

I'll repeat Nabeshin's request for an explanation here.
 
  • #25
Nabeshin
Science Advisor
2,207
16
Lol thank you redbelly. That claim was thrown out there but nobody wants to take up the task of explaining it? :P
 
  • #26
W3pcq
94
0
W3pcq: I concern physics. The OP asked a physics related question and he should get the answer from contemporary physics, not just speculations from laymen non-physicists (see the forum rules), they you may keep to yourself or post elsewhere.


nuby: All mass generates gravity, just not the neutron.

I may be mistaken, but I have always thought that a neutron generates gravity.
 
  • #27
malawi_glenn
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
6,003
1,427
I may be mistaken, but I have always thought that a neutron generates gravity.

All mass generates gravuty, just not the neutron.
 
  • #28
W3pcq
94
0
So the neutron doesn't generate gravity?
 
  • #29
malawi_glenn
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
6,003
1,427
Lol thank you redbelly. That claim was thrown out there but nobody wants to take up the task of explaining it? :P


One can just google "Gravity + repulsive" and see if one gets realible source which can explian it. I did not find much, nor in my cosmology books.
 
  • #30
malawi_glenn
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
6,003
1,427
So the neutron doesn't generate gravity?


Well what is the mass of the neutron?
 
  • #31
W3pcq
94
0
Isn't the mass of the neutron=to the mass of a proton?
 
  • #32
malawi_glenn
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
6,003
1,427
Isn't the mass of the neutron=to the mass of a proton?

Well roughly, it is a little little bit heavier. So does neutrons generate gravity?
 
  • #33
W3pcq
94
0
I guess the answer you are looking for is no because gravity is a result of a change of the structure of space time and not generated by mass.
 
  • #34
malawi_glenn
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
6,003
1,427
I tohugh you could use your logic, since I have two times stated that all mass generates gravity and since the neutrons have mass, they generate gravity. Many people thinks that the role of the neutron in atoms are to generate gravity, that is a very big missconception! (does not the hydrogen atom generate gravity??).

Another missconception is that people tends to separate gravity from space-time curvaturing. Gravity IS curvature in space, generated by mass.
 
  • #35
W3pcq
94
0
I tohugh you could use your logic, since I have two times stated that all mass generates gravity and since the neutrons have mass, they generate gravity. Many people thinks that the role of the neutron in atoms are to generate gravity, that is a very big missconception! (does not the hydrogen atom generate gravity??).

Another missconception is that people tends to separate gravity from space-time curvaturing. Gravity IS curvature in space, generated by mass.

According to general relativity it is. Of coarse that is a grossly over simplified way of putting it.
 

Suggested for: Gravity verses electromagnetic attraction

Replies
8
Views
484
Replies
9
Views
568
Replies
15
Views
998
Replies
10
Views
772
Replies
9
Views
685
Replies
4
Views
649
Replies
9
Views
986
Top