Great Explanations: Feynman & Sagan

  • Thread starter Thread starter stabu
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion focuses on identifying notable explainers and explanations across various fields, including science and mathematics. Participants share examples of individuals and their works that exemplify effective communication of complex concepts.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest Richard Feynman's analogy of humans as tiny insects in a swimming pool as a great explanation.
  • Others mention Carl Sagan's description of a cube as the shadow of a tesseract as a notable example.
  • William Feller's work on probability is highlighted as a significant contribution to understanding complex ideas.
  • Roger Penrose's "Road to Reality" is referenced for its insights, though specific examples are not detailed.
  • Jakob Bronowski's "Ascent of Man" is noted for its explanation of Pythagoras' theorem.
  • Sir Ray Lankester's "Diversion of a Naturalist" and D'Arcy Thompson's "Growth and Form" are also suggested as valuable works.
  • Concerns are raised about the balance between popularization and depth in scientific writing, particularly in Richard Dawkins' works.
  • Lisa Randall's "Warped Passages" is mentioned for its explanations of extra dimensions.
  • A philosophical analogy attributed to Buddha is shared, illustrating the improbability of existence through a metaphor involving a turtle and a life preserver.
  • Steven Strogatz's columns in the New York Times are recognized for their accessible explanations of mathematical concepts.
  • Leon Lederman's analogy comparing physics to an invisible soccer ball is proposed as an effective explanatory tool.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants present a variety of examples and perspectives, with no consensus on a definitive list of great explainers or explanations. The discussion remains open-ended with multiple viewpoints expressed.

Contextual Notes

Some contributions reflect a concern about the depth of explanations in popular science writing, suggesting that the target audience may influence the quality of understanding achieved.

stabu
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I wanted to collate a list of either great explainers or great explanations. Would you like to suggest one or two? Style:

Feynman - we on Earth as a tiny insect in corner of swimming pool.
Sagan - cube as shadow of a tesseract

I'm sure these are familiar to people here. However, it need not be Physics or even just science.

I'm also reading Modern Scientific Writing by Dawkins and trying to pull some out of there too.

Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
William Feller on probability
Roger Penrose, somewhere in his Road to Reality book
Jakob Bronowski in his Ascent of Man, especially explaining how Pythagoras' theorem may have come about.
 
Sir Ray Lankester "Diversion of a Naturalist"
D'Arcy Thompson "Growth and Form"
 
Of course, Richard Dawkin's "Book of scientific writing" would appear to be the first port of call for somebody interested in quality scientific explanations, but here we encounter a problem: popularization tends to become the main priority. No bad thing in and of itself. However, the target audience is then different. Many of these explanations turn out to be for the layman, so the the reader interested in learnng in depth is left unsatisfied.
 
Lisa Randall does a good job of explaining extra dimensions in her book Warped Passages.
 
Buddha said something along these lines, concerning the fact YOU exist.
' Think of the World covered in water. Toss in one life preserver that gets blown from all 4 directions. Think of a turtle that surfaces every hundred years, [what the hey a thou], for a breath. The odds and/or circumstances of when the turtle's head will come up in the life preserver explains how YOU are here. '
 
Leon Lederman with his analogy of physics and an invisible soccer ball.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
749
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
18K
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
11K