News Greece closes banks and imposes capital control

  • Thread starter Thread starter Czcibor
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Control
AI Thread Summary
Greece is facing a severe financial crisis, leading to the closure of banks and the implementation of capital controls as the government struggles to negotiate bailout terms. The situation has escalated due to a failed deal with the Eurogroup and a referendum on bailout conditions, prompting mass cash withdrawals from banks. The discussion highlights the complexities of Greece's debt, the influence of the "Troika" (IMF, Eurozone, ECB), and the political ramifications of potential default or exit from the Eurozone. Critics argue that austerity measures have been ineffective and that the EU's rigid policies have exacerbated Greece's economic woes. The debate continues over whether Greece can implement necessary reforms and whether the EU should allow it to default or exit.
  • #51
A Greek exit is nor a foregone conclusion. Greece could conceivably fund its spending with euros, and just not pay its bondholders back. It looks like they have more than enough euros to do this. It may not be the path they take, for good reason, but it looks possible for them to stay,
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #52
Tosh5457 said:
Except that if Greece goes, there go all the bonds that European governments and banks hold, because they're not paying that in an undervalued Dracma. And I sense a bit of bigotry in your speech, as if 11 million people mean nothing.

The bonds? They are useless now. They were useless when issued. Everyone knows Greece is insolvent and will be for the foreseeable future.

Your ignorance is what's apparent. Not my bigotry. Ignoring reality may be noble to you. Ignorance, despite the saying, is not bliss...it is just ignorance.
 
  • #53
Tosh5457 said:
IMO the negotiations should aim debt restructuring and/or partial default, because even if Greece is lent more money, it's not getting off 200%+ GDP on debt so soon and a future default is very likely in any case. IMF and similar entities loans carry a risk, and now it's the time to pay for taking that risk. This won't be popular anywhere, because Greece's bonds will be labeled as junk for the years to come.

Stop. Aaron said that in no so nice way, however he more he is right. When IMF and Eurozone were buying them they knew that the business is awful. The idea was to save Greece / save bondholders/ prevent contagion. The spread was many times lower than the market one. The point is they were intended to carry almost no risk.
Vanadium 50 said:
A Greek exit is nor a foregone conclusion. Greece could conceivably fund its spending with euros, and just not pay its bondholders back. It looks like they have more than enough euros to do this. It may not be the path they take, for good reason, but it looks possible for them to stay,
May you explain your point? Because their euros are ultimately in ECB, and ECB is able now in any moment stop ELA and claim those money...
 
  • #54
Yes, but the ECB does not have to seize assets. My point is not that Greek will not leave the Euro. My point is that default does not mandate it.
 
  • #55
tom aaron said:
Those countries are very different from each other other than being on the brink of insolvency. Italy is a huge market...Spain also but lesser so. Portugal is insignificant.

Italy is psychologically part of modern Europe. Spain is a newcomer. When I was a boy we would take vacations to Spain and it was a lot like being in North Africa...more like Morocco. The modern trappings in Spain today are a veneer without much underpinning it...corruption, inefficiency. I still find it hard to understand why the more industrial, educated northeast (Barcelona) hasn't separated.

As for resources...Denmark and the Netherlands that are on par with other affluent nations...their resources other than 'people' are near zero. They have an educated, efficient society.
Greece's issue is not debt but the ability to generate value. The homeless man with no debt and 50 dollars in his pocket is less well off than the guy with a good education, job, house but owes ten thousand dollars. Greece is like that homeless guy...no prospects. Germany, Denmark, etc. are like the latter.

I would disagree with you about Denmark and the Netherlands having near zero resources since both countries do have very fertile land for agriculture (unlike Greece). Furthermore, doesn't Denmark have easy access to natural resources from neighbouring Scandinavian countries from which they have maintained strong trade and cultural links, like Norway and Sweden? And from my reading of history, the Netherlands have a long history as both a trading nation and a former colonial power (along the likes of Britain and France), with colonies in the Americas and Asia which contributed a certain degree of wealth, laying the foundation for future prosperity (in contrast to Greece, a long-neglected colony of the Ottoman Empire).

At any rate, you mentioned that Greece's issue is the ability to generate value -- I take it you are referring to the capacity of the Greek economy to grow their economy. In that respect, what I have stated earlier does not contradict this, since I have stated that Greece's economy is heavily reliant on tourism and not much else (apart from shipping, and I'm not sure how much Greece has the capacity grow that part of the economy).
 
  • #56
StatGuy2000 said:
I would disagree with you about Denmark and the Netherlands having near zero resources since both countries do have very fertile land for agriculture (unlike Greece). Furthermore, doesn't Denmark have easy access to natural resources from neighbouring Scandinavian countries from which they have maintained strong trade and cultural links, like Norway and Sweden? And from my reading of history, the Netherlands have a long history as both a trading nation and a former colonial power (along the likes of Britain and France), with colonies in the Americas and Asia which contributed a certain degree of wealth, laying the foundation for future prosperity (in contrast to Greece, a long-neglected colony of the Ottoman Empire).

At any rate, you mentioned that Greece's issue is the ability to generate value -- I take it you are referring to the capacity of the Greek economy to grow their economy. In that respect, what I have stated earlier does not contradict this, since I have stated that Greece's economy is heavily reliant on tourism and not much else (apart from shipping, and I'm not sure how much Greece has the capacity grow that part of the economy).

Greece has ALL of the EU to draw upon...as much as Denmark and the Netherlands. That is the point of the EU. They are also a gateway to the Near East. They have had ample time to get their act together especially with the infusion of tens of billions in Euros. They also benefit from stable currency and EU trading agreements with the rest of the world.

The Greeks have been masters of their own fate. There is no excuse for an inept system of tax infrastructure, inefficient social programs, etc. They have had ample opportunity to implement reforms and collect a billion of unpaid domestic taxes than ask the Germans for another billion.
 
  • #57
Constantine Michalos, head of the http://www.uhc.gr/newsite/english/index.php?menu=main_menu&page=home , said lenders are simply running out of money. "We are reliably informed that the cash reserves of the banks are down to €500m. Anybody who thinks they are going to open again on Tuesday is day-dreaming. The cash would not last an hour," he said.

"We are in an extremely dangerous situation. Greek companies have been excluded from the electronic transfers of Europe's Target2 system. The entire Greek business community is unable to import anything, and without raw materials they can't produce anything," he said.

Pavlos Deas, owner of an olive processing factory in Chalkidiki, told The Telegraph that he may have to shut down a plant employing 250 people within days.

"We can't send any money abroad to our suppliers. Three of our containers have been stopped at customs control because the banks can't give a bill of lading. One is full of Spanish almonds, the others full of Chinese garlic," he said.

"We don't know how we are going to execute and export an order of 60 containers for the US. We don't even have enough gas. We asked for 10,000 litres but they are only letting us have 2,000. It's being rationed by the day. Factories are closing around us in a domino effect and we're all going to lose everything if this goes on," he said.

The fast-moving events come amid signs of deep dissension within the coalition over the wisdom of http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/greece/11707952/Greek-referendum-what-will-a-Yes-or-No-vote-mean.html. The vote was originally intended to secure a stronger negotiating mandate for a showdown with Europe's creditor powers, but it is rapidly turning into an "in-or-out" decision on euro membership and the survival of the Syriza government.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/...500m-in-cash-reserves-as-economy-crashes.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #58
tom aaron said:
As for resources...

See Hong Kong, Singapore for examples of societies with strong economic output and almost no native resources.
 
  • #59
tom aaron said:
The bonds? They are useless now. They were useless when issued. Everyone knows Greece is insolvent and will be for the foreseeable future.

Your ignorance is what's apparent. Not my bigotry. Ignoring reality may be noble to you. Ignorance, despite the saying, is not bliss...it is just ignorance.

So you admit you're a bigot, just that it's not so apparent?

Czcibor said:
Stop. Aaron said that in no so nice way, however he more he is right. When IMF and Eurozone were buying them they knew that the business is awful. The idea was to save Greece / save bondholders/ prevent contagion. The spread was many times lower than the market one. The point is they were intended to carry almost no risk.

That's a contradiction, if the business was awful it means the risk was actually much higher than the spread they agreed with.
 
  • #60
Good, recent Greek debt/default primer here:

June 29th, 2015
http://faculty.chicagobooth.edu/anil.kashyap/research/papers/A-Primer-on-the-Greek-Crisis_june29.pdf
http://www.chicagobooth.edu/faculty/directory/k/anil-kashyap

1) How did Greece get into such trouble?
2) Wasn’t Greece already bailed out in 2010?
3) Why did that rescue fail?
4) What is the troika (or the institutions) and what do they have to do with this?
5) Wasn’t Greece also bailed out in 2012?
6) Why is Greece in trouble again now?
7) What is the Greek government asking for?
8) Why do the institutions disagree with the government?
9) Why is the IMF loan that is coming due so important?
10) What did the ECB decide this weekend and why is Greece closing its banks?
11) What can Greece do to save its economy now?
12) Why not just bring back the drachma?
13) Will the Greek crisis spread?
14) What is likely to happen next in Greece?
15) What happens to the IMF if its loan is not repaid?
16) What happens to the ECB if Greece defaults?
17) Can the ECB survive if Greece defaults?
18) What should have been done to avert this crisis?
 
  • Like
Likes tom aaron
  • #61
mheslep said:
Good, recent Greek debt/default primer here:

June 29th, 2015
http://faculty.chicagobooth.edu/anil.kashyap/research/papers/A-Primer-on-the-Greek-Crisis_june29.pdf
http://www.chicagobooth.edu/faculty/directory/k/anil-kashyap

1) How did Greece get into such trouble?
2) Wasn’t Greece already bailed out in 2010?
3) Why did that rescue fail?
4) What is the troika (or the institutions) and what do they have to do with this?
5) Wasn’t Greece also bailed out in 2012?
6) Why is Greece in trouble again now?
7) What is the Greek government asking for?
8) Why do the institutions disagree with the government?
9) Why is the IMF loan that is coming due so important?
10) What did the ECB decide this weekend and why is Greece closing its banks?
11) What can Greece do to save its economy now?
12) Why not just bring back the drachma?
13) Will the Greek crisis spread?
14) What is likely to happen next in Greece?
15) What happens to the IMF if its loan is not repaid?
16) What happens to the ECB if Greece defaults?
17) Can the ECB survive if Greece defaults?
18) What should have been done to avert this crisis?

This is a concise good summary. However, it needs to be remembered that he ECB is essentially still German, Dutch, etc taxpayers. The Finns are the angriest with the Greeks. They have worked hard to build a viable, affluent society and are 'pissed' at Greek lethargy.

The issue also extends to other arrangements such as NATO. European solidarity is not for the sake of it but based on principles of freedom, good management, competency, etc. organizations for 'good'. A positive arrangement for all.Thus why concerns over inclusion of Turkey economically, inclusion of Ukraine in defense, etc. Solidarity is built on principles.
 
  • #62
tom aaron said:
Greece has ALL of the EU to draw upon...as much as Denmark and the Netherlands. That is the point of the EU. They are also a gateway to the Near East. They have had ample time to get their act together especially with the infusion of tens of billions in Euros. They also benefit from stable currency and EU trading agreements with the rest of the world.

The Greeks have been masters of their own fate. There is no excuse for an inept system of tax infrastructure, inefficient social programs, etc. They have had ample opportunity to implement reforms and collect a billion of unpaid domestic taxes than ask the Germans for another billion.

My own personal opinion is that the unpaid domestic taxes in Greece is a symptom of a general lack of trust that exists within Greek society toward the government, due to a history of dictatorships and unstable governments.

At any rate, your quote above (Greece has ALL of the RU to draw upon) epitomizes the very problem inherent with the adoption of the euro to begin with -- since each nation is sacrificing their ability to set monetary policy (and monetary policy, along with fiscal policy, are among the primary tools that allow governments to shape the economy to the extent possible for any governments), in essence, every member state is drawing upon every other EU nation. Implicit within the adoption of the euro is that the fiscal and monetary status of an EU nation is tied to all others.

It has been my opinion all along that both governments and regular citizens of each of the member states never understood the full implications of what it means to be in a true monetary union i.e. no single nation has control over their own respective monetary policy (that is why I have always felt that the adoption of the common currency under the current framework of the EU was a dubious endeavour). If they did, I would hasten to state that member states would not have been so eager to consider joining the Eurozone.

At this stage, it seems clear to me that the Greek government (and likely the bulk of its population -- we'll know more based on the results of the referendum) and the main creditor nations of the EU (e.g. Germany) are so far apart in terms of what can be agreed that it seems inevitable that Greece will default in its debt commitments, and I just do not see any further benefit for Greece to stay in the euro. Your posts in this thread is in itself a reflection of this (given that you are either German or French, since you stated earlier that you grew up near the German/French border) -- it seems quite clear to me that you do not really feel that Greeks are fellow Europeans who share a common fate with the rest of Europe (part of the rationale that was trumpeted with joining the euro).
 
  • #63
Tosh5457 said:
That's a contradiction, if the business was awful it means the risk was actually much higher than the spread they agreed with.

Yes, the risk was much higher. On market no-one was willing to buy Greek bonds. (well, the market return rate of 10 year bonds was above 30% per year, which was many times above what Greek taxpayers would be realistically able to pay). In consequence it were govs (also indirectly through IMF or ECB) who bought those bonds on much lower interest rate. The idea was to make a bail out, and not to make a business.

Some of those govs, like Italy, actually lent Greeks those money cheaper than they could borrow on their own on market...
 
  • Like
Likes Tosh5457
  • #64
Czcibor said:
Yes, the risk was much higher. On market no-one was willing to buy Greek bonds. (well, the market return rate of 10 year bonds was above 30% per year, which was many times above what Greek taxpayers would be realistically able to pay). In consequence it were govs (also indirectly through IMF or ECB) who bought those bonds on much lower interest rate. The idea was to make a bail out, and not to make a business.

Some of those govs, like Italy, actually lent Greeks those money cheaper than they could borrow on their own on market...

This is what many late comers to this do not understand. Greece was insolvent. No way out. Other countries did their best 'despite' knowing that it was not an actual investment. Like helping a brother out knowing the chances of getting your money back was zilch. Ask him to stop drinking, get a job, clean up his act...here's some money. So Greece did what? Nothing.

This isn't Germany, etc. lending the Greeks money in a vacuum. It's after a lengthy record of incompetence and trying to help them out 'again'. Greece is like the brother who now promises to look for a job 'next month' when he said the same thing last month, and last year. Europe has thrown up its arms in complete frustration.
 
  • #65
tom aaron said:
This is what many late comers to this do not understand. Greece was insolvent. No way out. Other countries did their best 'despite' knowing that it was not an actual investment. Like helping a brother out knowing the chances of getting your money back was zilch. Ask him to stop drinking, get a job, clean up his act...here's some money. So Greece did what? Nothing.

This isn't Germany, etc. lending the Greeks money in a vacuum. It's after a lengthy record of incompetence and trying to help them out 'again'. Greece is like the brother who now promises to look for a job 'next month' when he said the same thing last month, and last year. Europe has thrown up its arms in complete frustration.

It was more complicated then lending a brother... Let's say that Greeks instead would have defaulted. Who would be in bad situation? Seriously? Greeks... a bit worse (they would anyway shed some this debt, even though the prior borrowing was based on fraud; out of those whole aid they had a chance to spend round 10%, the rest was for debt servicing). Banks of countries that lent to Greece at start - seriously worse. Other peripheral countries - in case of a chain reaction - much worse. So there was some kind of self interest from other countries, but not the "investment" argument.
 
  • #66
tom aaron said:
So Greece did what? Nothing. ...

After the initial bailout Greece did reduce government spending and has reduced its primary deficit, down to near zero IIRC. Tsipras is now trying to undo some of those spending cuts. The problem has been two fold: i) the debt Greece incurred while cooking its books was so large that it swamped other spending cuts, and ii) Greece failed to do much with regard to other actions to open up the economy (thus grow the economy, thus revenues, thus shrink the GDP/debt ratio). In this "economic freedom" ranking of nations Greece ranks 130th, based on metrics like labor law and property rights.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Czcibor
  • #67
mheslep said:
See Hong Kong, Singapore for examples of societies with strong economic output and almost no native resources.
And Israel, Taiwan, South Korea. Depressingly, there are plenty of examples of the opposite: countries with plenty of resources and a broken economy. Maybe Venezuela is the most notable one, and on top of that, the world's 2nd highest murder rate. Modern, non-biblical version of Paradise lost. Not much beyond a string of beauty queens in the Miss Universe pageant.
 
Last edited:
  • #68
phinds said:
Absolutely true, but neither should we find it acceptable that the Greek population seems to blame Europe for their troubles rather than their own corrupt and incompetent government. I don't mind that they want help to bail them out of their problem, and it seems to be in everyone's interest for that to happen, but I find it deeply offensive that they blame others for their troubles. Germany didn't whine about having had the crap bombed out of it during the war and they were grateful for the help they got from a former enemy that was under no obligation to help them rebuild. The Greeks seem to want a free lunch.
Germany didn't whine, you obviously discount the efforts of bomber Harris and his attempt to flatten Dresden.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sir_Arthur_Harris,_1st_Baronet
With some abandon!
 
  • #69
Buckleymanor said:
Germany didn't whine, you obviously discount the efforts of bomber Harris and his attempt to flatten Dresden.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sir_Arthur_Harris,_1st_Baronet
With some abandon!
I don't get your point at all. No one is happy getting clobbered during war. My point was that Germans didn't whine about it after the war, they picked themselves up and got on with building what is now the strongest economy in Europe.
 
  • #70
The Greek labor force, which amount around 5 million workers, average 2,032 hours of work per worker annually in 2011, is ranked fourth among OECD countries, after Mexico, South Korea and Chile.[74] The Groningen Growth & Development Centre has published a poll revealing that between 1995 and 2005, Greece was the country whose workers have the most hours/year work among European nations; Greeks worked an average of 1,900 hours per year, followed by Spaniards (average of 1,800 hours/year).[75]

By contrast
France and Germany had figures of 1532 and 1432 respectively.

reference,
http://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=ANHRS

The greeks are definitely not slaggards

also,
The country's post-World War II development has largely been connected with the so-called Greek economic miracle.[60] During that period, Greece saw growth rates second only to those of Japan, while ranking first in Europe in terms of GDP growth.[60] It is indicative that between 1960 and 1973 the Greek economy grew by an average of 7.7%, in contrast to 4.7% for the EU15 and 4.9 for the OECD.[60] Also during that period, exports grew by an average annual rate of 12.6%.[60]

The downturn of the world economy was really what knocked their socks off for some reason, and they could not recover.
 
  • #71
256bits said:
By contrast
France and Germany had figures of 1532 and 1432 respectively.

reference,
http://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=ANHRS

The greeks are definitely not slaggards

also,The downturn of the world economy was really what knocked their socks off for some reason, and they could not recover.

Seems like they may have serious productivity issues. Or maybe there are diminishing returns issues.
 
Last edited:
  • #72
WWGD said:
Seems like they may have serious productivity issues. Or maybe there are diminishing returns issues.

Economy of heavy reliance on an service based industries - tourism related I suppose might be a good part of it.
 
  • #73
WWGD said:
Seems like they may have serious productivity issues. Or maybe there are diminishing returns issues.
Far more significant, I think, is that they don't produce much. They once had one of the, if not the, world's leading shipping industries and it is still significant but other than that I don't think they are known for producing much of anything. The Economist's 2015 World in Figures gives their economy as 10% manufacturing and 80% services (and 3% agriculture and the rest "other"), so @256bits nailed that.
 
  • #74
phinds said:
Far more significant, I think, is that they don't produce much. They once had one of the, if not the, world's leading shipping industries and it is still significant but other than that I don't think they are known for producing much of anything. The Economist's 2015 World in Figures gives their economy as 10% manufacturing and 80% services (and 3% agriculture and the rest "other"), so @256bits nailed that.

It's way above my league how to effectively grow an economy, but it seems like a good idea to look at the cases of countries similar to Greece in many respects that have been successful.
 
  • #75
WWGD said:
It's way above my league how to effectively grow an economy, but it seems like a good idea to look at the cases of countries similar to Greece in many respects that have been successful.
I think when you look at such things in detail you find that high-level similarities are not nearly as applicable as one might think. A country's history and culture count for more than external technocrats credit.
 
  • #76
Fascinating and informative discussion. Thanks to all and for the citations and links.

In particular, the impression I have gotten from the media (or my faulty ingestion of the media) is that the Greeks are an entitled population with short work weeks and many benefits, such as early retirement.

Evidence that is quoted above seems to debunk the idea that Greeks work less. I'm still interested to know what about benefits such as early retirement, and how those played into the crises.
 
  • #77
I don't think any lender is arguing that they don't want to extend new loans to Greece because Greeks are lazy. They are saying that they don't want to extend new loans to Greece because they don't think they will ever be paid back. Since Tuesday, when the Greeks stopped paying them back, it's hard to say this isn't a justified concern.

You asked about Greek pension figures. Here is what Google found: http://greece.greekreporter.com/2014/12/04/75-of-greek-pensioners-enjoy-early-retirement/ I have no idea of the quality of the source.

For years, Greek candidates for public office have been promising more and more benefits, and paying for them by borrowing rather than through taxation. They are now in a situation where they cannot pay it back. The populace, justifiably, feels swindled. It's easier to redirect this anger towards the Germans and the rest of the EU than to admit that they swindled themselves.
 
  • Like
Likes mheslep
  • #78
Vanadium 50 said:
I don't think any lender is arguing that they don't want to extend new loans to Greece because Greeks are lazy. They are saying that they don't want to extend new loans to Greece because they don't think they will ever be paid back. Since Tuesday, when the Greeks stopped paying them back, it's hard to say this isn't a justified concern.

You asked about Greek pension figures. Here is what Google found: http://greece.greekreporter.com/2014/12/04/75-of-greek-pensioners-enjoy-early-retirement/ I have no idea of the quality of the source.

For years, Greek candidates for public office have been promising more and more benefits, and paying for them by borrowing rather than through taxation. They are now in a situation where they cannot pay it back. The populace, justifiably, feels swindled. It's easier to redirect this anger towards the Germans and the rest of the EU than to admit that they swindled themselves.
Thank you for the article, Van.

In the mean time I had searched for information on the pension system. My own sense is that the pension system is (or at least was) way out of balance, is a huge burden to the tax payer/ bailers out and needs to be dealt with. It appears to be part of what is unsustainable about the crisis. Especially when Greeks can choose not to pay taxes.

It also looks to me that some of the debt needs to be written off, and that which cannot be needs to be restructured for there to be a possible way forward.

Finally, it appears that it is Greek politicians that sucked the populace into this mess. As harsh as it might be, there is not likely to be an enduring solution without some political pain and new political will.
 
  • #79
On paying taxes (not that I don't sympathize!)
http://www.wsj.com/articles/greece-struggles-to-get-citizens-to-pay-their-taxes-1424867495

“Greeks consider taxes as theft,” said Aristides Hatzis, an associate professor of law and economics at the University of Athens. “Normally taxes are considered the price you have to pay for a just state, but this is not accepted by the Greek mentality.”

Is it really clear that Greece belongs in the EU?
 
  • #80
pondhockey said:
Fascinating and informative discussion. Thanks to all and for the citations and links.

In particular, the impression I have gotten from the media (or my faulty ingestion of the media) is that the Greeks are an entitled population with short work weeks and many benefits, such as early retirement.

Evidence that is quoted above seems to debunk the idea that Greeks work less. I'm still interested to know what about benefits such as early retirement, and how those played into the crises.

Doesn't matter how hard somebody works. The Dutch work 'smart'. Australians work 'smart'. Vietnamese farm labourers in rice fields may work their buts off but American farmers will be more efficient using technology.

Greece is somewhere in between. They haven't invested in a First World economic infrastructure. They have been contented with 'getting by' when what they needed was initiative and innovation. The Germans, Danes, Singaporeans, Israelis, etc. prosper by moving forward.
 
  • #81
tom aaron said:
Doesn't matter how hard somebody works. The Dutch work 'smart'. Australians work 'smart'. Vietnamese farm labourers in rice fields may work their buts off but American farmers will be more efficient using technology.

Greece is somewhere in between. They haven't invested in a First World economic infrastructure. They have been contented with 'getting by' when what they needed was initiative and innovation. The Germans, Danes, Singaporeans, Israelis, etc. prosper by moving forward.

I know a few Greeks who just day dream of the Golden days. Maybe they are stuck in the old glory days.
 
  • #82
StatGuy2000 said:
My own personal opinion is that the unpaid domestic taxes in Greece is a symptom of a general lack of trust that exists within Greek society toward the government, due to a history of dictatorships and unstable governments.
Add Osman Turks occupation, which add additional layer to keeping tax evaders in specially high esteem...

Dictatorship... its not that in nicely governed country a few military leaders suddenly did a power grab... but more in a country close to becoming a failed state a few colonels thought they have to save their country on all price...

At any rate, your quote above (Greece has ALL of the RU to draw upon) epitomizes the very problem inherent with the adoption of the euro to begin with -- since each nation is sacrificing their ability to set monetary policy (and monetary policy, along with fiscal policy, are among the primary tools that allow governments to shape the economy to the extent possible for any governments), in essence, every member state is drawing upon every other EU nation. Implicit within the adoption of the euro is that the fiscal and monetary status of an EU nation is tied to all others.

It has been my opinion all along that both governments and regular citizens of each of the member states never understood the full implications of what it means to be in a true monetary union i.e. no single nation has control over their own respective monetary policy (that is why I have always felt that the adoption of the common currency under the current framework of the EU was a dubious endeavour). If they did, I would hasten to state that member states would not have been so eager to consider joining the Eurozone.
At the time of euro adoption, it was perceived (by economists) that as Milton Freedman was teaching - money was neutral. No chance of using any trick. So adopting common currency seemed reasonable, more in line of guaranteeing its stable value.

At this stage, it seems clear to me that the Greek government (and likely the bulk of its population -- we'll know more based on the results of the referendum) and the main creditor nations of the EU (e.g. Germany) are so far apart in terms of what can be agreed that it seems inevitable that Greece will default in its debt commitments, and I just do not see any further benefit for Greece to stay in the euro. Your posts in this thread is in itself a reflection of this (given that you are either German or French, since you stated earlier that you grew up near the German/French border) -- it seems quite clear to me that you do not really feel that Greeks are fellow Europeans who share a common fate with the rest of Europe (part of the rationale that was trumpeted with joining the euro).
At this moment I think there is shared disdain on both sides. Think about it in line of Greeks showing the rest Europe that they do not share common values or are not interested in any serious cooperation, while the EU showing unwillingness to send another bushel of money.
 
  • #83
pondhockey said:
In particular, the impression I have gotten from the media (or my faulty ingestion of the media) is that the Greeks are an entitled population with short work weeks and many benefits, such as early retirement.
It makes an easier to tell story. It's easier to say something like that then describe pathologies of society / political system.
They feel very entitled, just those who don't work in public sector have to work quite hard, that must be frustrating. So in desperation they vote for a politicians who promise to relive them from such pain through early retirement, public sector work, whatever...

pondhockey said:
It also looks to me that some of the debt needs to be written off, and that which cannot be needs to be restructured for there to be a possible way forward.
Yep, just other member states demand reform first, then as reward for reforms partial debt relieve.

What - do you think that's a well thought trap, not to relieve Greek of any debts? ;)

Finally, it appears that it is Greek politicians that sucked the populace into this mess. As harsh as it might be, there is not likely to be an enduring solution without some political pain and new political will.
And to deal with dysfunctionality of their politicians Greeks, elected new guys with new ideas... Syriza... ... Not, it seems as more problem of what they expect from politician and who they elect...
 
  • #84
phinds said:
I don't get your point at all. No one is happy getting clobbered during war. My point was that Germans didn't whine about it after the war, they picked themselves up and got on with building what is now the strongest economy in Europe.
Well excuse me for the literal take on it. If you bothered to read the wiki article Germany only recently objected to a statue commemorating Mr, Harris's accomplishments.
So in my wrong interpretation of events the Germans are still whining today.
May-be if the Germans did not receive the financial help they did after the war the Greeks and I might agree with your point.
 
  • Like
Likes Tosh5457
  • #85
I found another nice comment on the net:
[The referendum] gives new meaning to the term "exit poll."
 
  • Like
Likes phinds
  • #87
Czcibor said:
From opinion pools it looks like "Oxi" (No), but its not certain yet.

http://www.theguardian.com/business...ferendum-gets-under-way--eu-euro-bailout-live
That's a sign (if we still needed on) that even if the vote is "yes", the number of people in Greece who distrust the European authorities is so large that meaningful reforms will be seen as being imposed by the outside "evil" forces and thus VERY hard to legislate/implement.
 
  • #88
phinds said:
That's a sign (if we still needed on) that even if the vote is "yes", the number of people in Greece who distrust the European authorities is so large that meaningful reforms will be seen as being imposed by the outside "evil" forces and thus VERY hard to legislate/implement.

Yes, the worst result would be a tiny majority for yes. (neither to kick out nor to save)

OK, so far (20% counted) it seems safe margin of around 60% for "No".

Politicians on both sides speak about further negotiations... :oldbiggrin: So far it looks like scenario of leaving Eurozone in the most painful way...

Should ECB suggest some end of life treatment care? ;)
 
  • #89
Czcibor said:
Yes, the worst result would be a tiny majority for yes. (neither to kick out nor to save)

OK, so far (20% counted) it seems safe margin of around 60% for "No".

Politicians on both sides speak about further negotiations... :oldbiggrin: So far it looks like scenario of leaving Eurozone in the most painful way...

Should ECB suggest some end of life treatment care? ;)
It seems that the Greek people believe that a "no" means they get a better deal in the negotiations. I think they should take Junker more seriously. He's been on their side all along, but even he is fed up w/ them now and has made that clear. Hard to see why they don't take him seriously.
 
  • #90
phinds said:
It seems that the Greek people believe that a "no" means they get a better deal in the negotiations. I think they should take Junker more seriously. He's been on their side all along, but even he is fed up w/ them now and has made that clear. Hard to see why they don't take him seriously.

The happiest people with this outcome are the German taxpayers. Finally now able to stop the travesty of leaders ignoring reality. No pouring more money into a cesspool hoping its going to make it stink less.
 
  • #91
Wow, suddenly this stopped seeming a scientific forum, and instead started looking like a Greek bashing forum based in nonsense. By all means critize what should be critized, but not based in wrong data like I see here.

Greeks don't like working? Greek work hours:
But the Office for National Statistics seems to be on a mission to rescue us from our own prejudices. New data published this morning shows that Greek workers actually put in longer hours than anyone else in Europe — 42.2 per week, compared to just 35.6 in Germany. If you look at full-time figures, it is even starker.

http://www.theguardian.com/news/datablog/2011/dec/08/europe-working-hours

"Greeks retire at 58". Greek effective retirement age:
http://www.forbes.com/sites/jasonob...ve-retirement-age-vs-official-retirement-age/
62.4 years, above many European countries.

Buckleymanor said:
Well excuse me for the literal take on it. If you bothered to read the wiki article Germany only recently objected to a statue commemorating Mr, Harris's accomplishments.
So in my wrong interpretation of events the Germans are still whining today.
May-be if the Germans did not receive the financial help they did after the war the Greeks and I might agree with your point.

I agree, if there is one country in Europe that can't complain about others paying off for their expenses, it's Germany, yet they're the ones who complain the most. Northern European countries got massive aid after WWII likewise. So the argument that others shouldn't pay for Greece problems, should really be that others don't want to pay for Greece problems. I'm ok with that, they'll go bankrupt in any case most likely, but just can't stand these supposedly moralist arguments.

Bottom-line, Greece's problem was a clear economic mismanagement that didn't allow them to increase their productivity, and also because of the fast deindustralization they went through, not because they're lazy people trying to live off others, like this thread could easily make one think.
 
  • #92
tom aaron said:
The happiest people with this outcome are the German taxpayers. Finally now able to stop the travesty of leaders ignoring reality. No pouring more money into a cesspool hoping its going to make it stink less.
Why should they be happy, if the situation with Greece is not resolved with a positive outcome and Greece remains within the Eurozone, then there is every chance that the situation becomes contagious within Europe and the rest of the world and that the amount of money the German taxpayer is owed by that country is insignificant in comparison to other outstanding debts. Owed by other nations, this could result in crisis of confidence and should never have got to this stage.http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-15748696
 
  • #93
To those on the forum who have paid special attention to this issue (I'm specifically thinking of Czcibor, phinds, Tosh5457, and especially tom aaron), here is an article written for Prospect magazine by neo-Keynesian economist James Galbraith on the situation with Greece.

http://prospect.org/article/greece-only-no-can-save-euro
 
Last edited:
  • #94
Tosh5457 said:
Wow, suddenly this stopped seeming a scientific forum, and instead started looking like a Greek bashing forum based in nonsense. By all means critize what should be critized, but not based in wrong data like I see here.
Thanks for data, retirement age was new for me.

I think that mood is related to:
-having problems at their own request;
-not doing much reforms, even under EU threats;
-drowning there quite a lot of money by other member states (we in Poland are lucky that adopting euro was delayed);
-showing at the end quite nice rant with nationalistic undertones;
-showing still impaired ability to asses reality.

How was it called? Hubris? ;)

I agree, if there is one country in Europe that can't complain about others paying off for their expenses, it's Germany, yet they're the ones who complain the most.
I'd say Finns and Balts.

Northern European countries got massive aid after WWII likewise.
Some of them, while other were paying contributions or were ordered by their Soviet occupants to not accept Marshal aid.
So the argument that others shouldn't pay for Greece problems, should really be that others don't want to pay for Greece problems. I'm ok with that, they'll go bankrupt in any case most likely, but just can't stand these supposedly moralist arguments.
Which problems? Acute ones or long term ones? I mean Greece was being heavily subsidized from 1981. Just it did not work. (for example in case of Ireland smaller funds and open market did miracles) It simply looks like nothing can be done. And my guess is that EU actually tried to keep Greece in Eurozone at high cost, just not to make their prior political decisions highly embarrassing for themselves.
 
  • #95
Tosh5457 said:
Wow, suddenly this stopped seeming a scientific forum, and instead started looking like a Greek bashing forum based in nonsense. By all means critize what should be critized, but not based in wrong data like I see here.
...
Bottom-line, Greece's problem was a clear economic mismanagement that didn't allow them to increase their productivity, and also because of the fast deindustralization they went through, not because they're lazy people trying to live off others, like this thread could easily make one think.
I think you are drawing conclusions about what people think that do not match or follow from what they have said. Being lazy (or not) and wanting others to bail you out of your mistaks are not necessarily related issues.
 
  • #96
StatGuy2000 said:
To those on the forum who have paid special attention to this issue (I'm specifically thinking of Czcibor, phinds, Tosh5457, and especially tom aaron), here is an article written for Prospect magazine by neo-Keynsian economist James Galbraith on the situation with Greece.

http://prospect.org/article/greece-only-no-can-save-euro
Honestly? I've read the article and consider it as full of emotionally loaded language and seriously biased.

I think that this guy should just lend some of his own money to this [unique] "political leader".
 
  • #97
StatGuy2000 said:
To those on the forum who have paid special attention to this issue (I'm specifically thinking of Czcibor, phinds, Tosh5457, and especially tom aaron), here is an article written for Prospect magazine by neo-Keynsian economist James Galbraith on the situation with Greece.

http://prospect.org/article/greece-only-no-can-save-euro
Actually, not particularly helpful, just a lot of overly emotional statements.

I've been following international affairs and finances for decades and I can absolutely guarantee you that if you put 4 economists in a room, you will get 5 different, and strongly held, views on how most any particular issue should be dealt with. Often these conflicting views are all, or mostly all, seemingly well reasoned but at the end of the day just boil down to a restatement of the particular school of economic thought that each particular economist subscribes to and are not necessarily helpful to a particular situation.
 
  • #98
phinds said:
Actually, not particularly helpful, just a lot of overly emotional statements.

I've been following international affairs and finances for decades and I can absolutely guarantee you that if you put 4 economists in a room, you will get 5 different, and strongly held, views on how most any particular issue should be dealt with. Often these conflicting views are all, or mostly all, seemingly well reasoned but at the end of the day just boil down to a restatement of the particular school of economic thought that each particular economist subscribes to and are not necessarily helpful to a particular situation.
Honestly I thought more Keynesian thought was mostly absorbed into neoclassical synthesis, and within the mainstreams the quarrels are more or less limited. And what was done in this article was more an ideological story, rather unrelated to economics (like about how the negotiations went).

An awkward question about democratic mandate:
An opinion poll by Infratest Dimap for public broadcaster ARD published on Friday showed 68% of Germans blame the Greek government for the escalation of the debt crisis, with only 4% pointing the finger at other eurozone countries. The poll of 1,501 voters was conducted from June 29 to July 1 and had a margin of error of 1.4% to 3.1%.

In a separate Forschungsgruppe Wahlen survey for public broadcaster ZDF on Thursday, 85% of Germans said Europe was right not to have made more concessions to the Greek government. The poll of 1,234 respondents was conducted from June 30 to July 2 and had a margin of error of 2% to 3%.

Read more: http://www.nasdaq.com/article/greek...-open-resentment-20150704-00002#ixzz3f3pzmEOJ

As Tsiparis insisted, the will of People has to be respected ;) And more seriously with so big gap between societies the deal had been hard to get.
 
  • #99
The problem with this referendum is that the Greeks cannot vote that Germany will give them a loan.

I also find it hard to blame the Institutions. Are their terms stupid and counter-productive? Yes. But the only reason they are being discussed is because nobody else will lend, and the reason that nobody else will lend is because Greece is not going to pay them back.
 
  • Like
Likes Greg Bernhardt
  • #100
I thought that this article from 2012 citing what is wrong with Greece was good. It might be a good refresher on why they went downhill.

Tassos Chronopoulos, owner of Tassos, a Greek food importer based outside Chicago, says that the country’s disorganized agricultural business all but disqualified itself from partaking in the fancy-food craze of the past few decades. Greek growers never banded together to establish uniform quality standards and trade rules. (Chronopoulos often found bottles spiked with cheaper vegetable oil.) Frequent strikes at large ports damaged food and reputations. Until he found a reliable partner, Chronopoulos says that he constantly opened new shipments to see bottles with labels askew, wrinkled or missing. “They do not understand,” he says, “that a label not applied properly will make the sales suffer.”

Money from richer European taxpayers flowed to Greek farmers to upgrade their farms, “but the Europeans and the Greek government had no control mechanism,” he says. Instead of investing in new tractors, “the farmers were taking the money and buying things like Mercedeses.”
Good article.

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/08/magazine/what-greece-makes-the-world-might-take.html?_r=0
 
  • Like
Likes StatGuy2000, WWGD and Greg Bernhardt
Back
Top